Isn't it a bit delusional to think we can strike a balance with tech while staying true to the raw experience of cycling? Sure, tracking progress sounds great, but if it's all about logging data and not about feeling the burn, are we even training? 
Those virtual group rides might keep the social aspect alive, but when was the last time anyone felt genuinely challenged on a stationary bike while pretending to race avatars? Are we just pacifying ourselves with these digital distractions, rather than pushing our limits?
And let’s talk about that “personalized” coaching—it’s hilarious that we think a few algorithms can capture the nuances of our rides. If these apps can’t adapt to the real-world demands of cycling, why are we buying into their promises? Shouldn’t we be demanding more from these platforms, insisting they cater to the sweat, grit, and mental toughness that define true cycling? What does it take to create a training environment that’s as tough as the real thing?
Those virtual group rides might keep the social aspect alive, but when was the last time anyone felt genuinely challenged on a stationary bike while pretending to race avatars? Are we just pacifying ourselves with these digital distractions, rather than pushing our limits?
And let’s talk about that “personalized” coaching—it’s hilarious that we think a few algorithms can capture the nuances of our rides. If these apps can’t adapt to the real-world demands of cycling, why are we buying into their promises? Shouldn’t we be demanding more from these platforms, insisting they cater to the sweat, grit, and mental toughness that define true cycling? What does it take to create a training environment that’s as tough as the real thing?
