In today's L'Equipe Magazine p.18, Thomas Voeckler responded to the question: "Can Lance Armstrong win 10 Tours de France?" as follows: "In 2009, the Tour will no longer interest him." One can assume that no one at the magazine noted this arithmetic error either.
"Ilan Vardi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In today's L'Equipe Magazine p.18, Thomas Voeckler responded to the
question:
Quoted message said:
"Can Lance Armstrong win 10 Tours de France?" as follows: "In 2009, the Tour will no longer interest him." One can assume that no one at the magazine noted this arithmetic error either.
-ilan
If you were really sophisticated, you would have quoted the article in French.
"Ilan Vardi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In today's L'Equipe Magazine p.18, Thomas Voeckler responded to the
question:
Quoted message said:
"Can Lance Armstrong win 10 Tours de France?" as follows: "In 2009, the Tour will no longer interest him." One can assume that no one at the magazine noted this arithmetic error either.
-ilan
If you were really sophisticated, you would have quoted the article in French.
He's implicitely assuming an expectation value that between 2005-2008, inclusive, he will either lose or sit out one Tour, so his chance at 10 will be in 2009, +/- 1.
"Dan Connelly" <d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Carl Sundquist said:
"Ilan Vardi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In today's L'Equipe Magazine p.18, Thomas Voeckler responded to the
question:
Quoted message said:
"Can Lance Armstrong win 10 Tours de France?" as follows: "In 2009, the Tour will no longer interest him." One can assume that no one at the magazine noted this arithmetic error either.
-ilan
If you were really sophisticated, you would have quoted the article in French.
He's implicitely assuming an expectation value that between 2005-2008, inclusive, he will either lose or sit out one Tour, so his chance at 10 will be in 2009, +/- 1.
Actually, in the same spirit as "I've never tested positive", Voeckler didn't actually answer the question.
"Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
"Ilan Vardi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In today's L'Equipe Magazine p.18, Thomas Voeckler responded to the
question:
Quoted message said:
"Can Lance Armstrong win 10 Tours de France?" as follows: "In 2009, the Tour will no longer interest him." One can assume that no one at the magazine noted this arithmetic error either.
-ilan
If you were really sophisticated, you would have quoted the article in French.
Here is the original French article:
Lance Armstrong il est le only coureur avec six victoires in le Tour de France. We have askeed le jeune Thomas Voeckler if Armstrong, he can win les dix victoires. Here is la reponse of le French champion :
'I do not think. In 2009, le Tour, he will not interest Armstrong. Bien sur, I assume la distribution de Poisson on la probabilite Armstrong, he win un Tour.'
"Ilan Vardi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In today's L'Equipe Magazine p.18, Thomas Voeckler responded to the
question:
Quoted message said:
"Can Lance Armstrong win 10 Tours de France?" as follows: "In 2009, the Tour will no longer interest him." One can assume that no one at the magazine noted this arithmetic error either.
And mathematician that you are you missed it as well. 6 wins last in 2004. 4 more makes 2008. As Voekler is saying, "Lance will win until he retires" it stands to reason that he would miss an 11th win because he wouldn't be interested any longer.