We're doomed.
--
..dt
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
dtmeister said:We're doomed.
--
..dt
yeah, they all look pretty healthy to me... ROFLMFBO!
i mean, you are obviously a healthy active person if you walk around your house right?
ok, so at least in the US, cyclists now have large metal and plastic road blocks on the road, and large metal and plastic path blocks on the footpath.
the only option i see, is that cyclists must take up agressive downhilling bikes and ride OVER these obstacles (extra points for jumping over a huge 4x4 or several mobility scooters). i mean sure, you have to carry them on the uphill, but think of all the tyre tracks you will leave on bonnets and foreheads :P
yup, we are doomed.
dtmeister said:We're doomed.
"..pretty healthy..." he says!?@! WTF... just look at the fat [censored]!
Yeah... healthy like a fattened calf! He actually looks like he needs
the scooter. The extremely sad thing about all this is that if people
do use these scooters just cos they are lazy then they will actually
need them in the long run!
--
Bean
Remove "yourfinger" before replying
dtmeister said:We're doomed.
<http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115291408087707342-d3knU98U3xXi3xesgCRyFSfaECs_20060728.html>
I've noticed it here. Lots more of those electric scooters around, and
many ridden by younger obese people. I assumed the lard-arses had
gravity-induced injuries such as twisted ankles. Could it be they are
just lazy?
OTOH, those things are not supposed to be on the road, unless there
is no footpath. And then they must ride against the traffic.
If they don't, we can easily let them know :-)
dtmeister said:We're doomed.
Bollox. Lets just get more creative. Remember those nifty chariot racing axle 'extensions' in Spartacus? Or was that in another sword 'n sandle epic?
dtmeister said:We're doomed.
It's not so bad. Just remember that the lazy w**kers who use those things aren't long for the world. Only problem is that we've gotta foot the bill for the fruitless treatment of their type II diabetes and other health problems until they finally kick the bucket.
I remember reading once that sharks actually need to keep swimming, or else the flow of water through their gills drops and they suffocate. When you think about it, people aren't that different. Once you stop moving, you're doomed. Only difference with us is that it isn't quick and clean.
Cheers,
Suzy
suzyj said:
It's not so bad. Just remember that the lazy w**kers who use those things aren't long for the world. Only problem is that we've gotta foot the bill for the fruitless treatment of their type II diabetes and other health problems until they finally kick the bucket.
Telephone Sanitisers, third class?
cfsmtb said:Telephone Sanitisers, third class?
i for one would think that cycling, as a form of immune boosting excersize, would help to protect the body against disease contracted from dirty telephones.
douggy adams would probably agree.
asterope said:douggy adams would probably agree.
Pah. Look where going to the gym got *him*.
--
Dave Hughes | [email hidden]
"Good Night Wesley, see you tomorrow. I'll most likely kill
you in the morning"
"cfsmtb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
suzyj said:
It's not so bad. Just remember that the lazy w**kers who use those
things aren't long for the world. Only problem is that we've gotta
foot the bill for the fruitless treatment of their type II diabetes and
other health problems until they finally kick the bucket.Telephone Sanitisers, third class?
So we're building an ark, huh?
dtmeister said:We're doomed.
Makes stealing the fat [censored]'s wallet all the more easy..
Bring on the scooters I say!
Is that guy in Hawthorn still trying to mow down peds with his scooter?
hippy
suzyj said:dtmeister said:We're doomed.
It's not so bad. Just remember that the lazy w**kers who use those
things aren't long for the world. Only problem is that we've gotta
foot the bill for the fruitless treatment of their type II diabetes and
other health problems until they finally kick the bucket.I remember reading once that sharks actually need to keep swimming, or
else the flow of water through their gills drops and they suffocate.
When you think about it, people aren't that different. Once you stop
moving, you're doomed. Only difference with us is that it isn't quick
and clean.Cheers,
Suzy
Health?
If you don't use it you'll lose it!
Friday
(Who has a healthy mind in a healthy body.)
Mike said:And then they must ride against the traffic.
Which law says that?
cfsmtb said:Telephone Sanitisers, third class?
NSW Public service at one stage had stocks of telephome cleaning fluid.
Mostly eucalyptus based.
Good on bakelite. Not so good on plastic.
suzyj said:Only problem is that we've gotta foot the bill for the
fruitless treatment of their type II diabetes and
other health problems until they finally kick the bucket.
Can you expand on this?
Or is this just a TDT/CA/etc obesity whine?
Terryc said:Mike said:And then they must ride against the traffic.
Which law says that?
The one that says they are classified as pedestrians?
--
BrettS
BrettS said:Terryc said:Mike said:And then they must ride against the traffic.
Which law says that?
The one that says they are classified as pedestrians?
And which law says that pedestrians must walk towards oncoming traffic?
It fits with modern life. We have dishwashers to do the washing up, video recorders to do the TV watching, and motorised scooters to do the walking. Pretty soon we will have robots to do the living for us.
Terryc said:BrettS said:Terryc said:Mike wrote:
>And then they must ride against the traffic.
Which law says that?
The one that says they are classified as pedestrians?
And which law says that pedestrians must walk towards oncoming traffic?
WA Road Traffic Code 2000 Section 203:
(3) A pedestrian travelling along a carriageway ¾
(a) shall, where practicable, travel on the carriageway, or on the side
of the carriageway, used by vehicles travelling in the opposite
direction and keep as far to the right side of the carriageway as is
practicable; and
(b) shall not travel on the carriageway alongside more than one other
pedestrian or vehicle travelling on the carriageway in the same
direction as the pedestrian, unless the pedestrian is overtaking other
pedestrians.
Modified penalty: 1 PU
# Pedestrian includes motorised wheelchair capable of <10km/h
--
Frank
[email hidden]
Drop DACKS to reply
"jur" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
It fits with modern life. We have dishwashers to do the washing up,
video recorders to do the TV watching, and motorised scooters to do the
walking. Pretty soon we will have robots to do the living for us.--
jur
Already happened. Usenet...
me (laid up with the 'flu...)
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.