Road Cycling · Public discussion

This guy is smart...

Started by Mark Hill · · Last activity · 24 posts · 1,069 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 July 2003
Last activity
24 July 2003
Original author
Mark Hill
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,069
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–24 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. VeloCat <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Reporting on sporting events is not real writing. My basic premise is that anyone, including
    myself, could write a sports column without any prior experience. There is ample evidence of this
    in just about every newspaper. Knowledge of the event being covered is clearly not a prerequisite.
    Most sports reporters are wannabes who dream of playing some the "game" but consider the walk to
    the bar to be their exercise quota for the day.

    The fact that the Tour gets so little coverage in most newspapers just demonstrates my point.
    Writing about the Tour requires some knowledge about the teams, stragegy, stages, etc. That would
    require some real homework by most reporters and is therefore too much work.

    To write about anything well one has to have a deep knowledge about it and it's not something you
    can pick up in a week or a month.

    I follow a lot of sports and could probably write a sports column as lame as some of those out
    there, making simple observations and having unoriginal opinions about "hot topics" (Kobe, NCAA,
    yadda yadda), but the really good columnists have a really deep knowledge of the sport itself, have
    followed it for years and know it's history and important figures.

    Quoted message said:

    It's much easier to write some stupid piece like "Cycling isn't a real sport" than it is to really
    report on the event. Real reporters cover events they have no knowledge of everyday. It takes hard
    work and dedication to do it well. Sports reporters don't like to be bothered by such details.

    There are also (the true) sports fans who can get into any competitive activity, even if they aren't
    familiar with it. Pre-Tiger Woods only golfers watched golf, in cycling largely due to the fame of
    Lance Armstrong the Tour de France (as opposed to bike racing in general though) has attracted lots
    of casual observers, fans who aren't cyclists.

    Quoted message said:

    I recognize that there are several excellent sports reporters who cover cycling events very
    well. I personally am a big fan of rbr's own Jeff Jones. My comments are directed to the vast
    majority of sports reporters who somehow make a living writing [censored] like the story that started
    this thread.

    These are lame-ass, unoriginal pieces. I was really disappointed with the lameness of the ESPN page
    2 piece since ESPN.com usually has pretty good columns.

    -Amit

  2. guess who said:


    It was written tongue in cheek, I think.

    Could be why he said in his own column:

    * Every once in a while -- some say more often -- they should change the name of this
    endeavor to: "Who Gave This Jackass A Column?"

    But I think that most readers were seeing red before they got to that part. 😉

  3. "jjr071160" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was in the other room when I think I heard on Headline News (6:40 p.m.
    CDT) that Ullrich flunked the drug test and is out? Can anyone confirm?

    *PLONK*

  4. "BOB BULLET" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    CONFIRMED.

    KEEP RACIN', BOB BULLET

    *PLONK*

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.