I am a tecnho numpty. I've bought a pair of these Aldi shoes. I started to follow the instructions but after putting the screws in the bottom of the shoe. i can't fathom how to put the bits on the inside of the shoe as the screws don't protrude far enough through for the inside bits to go onto.
Any help appreciated. I have fitted the outside bits and these feel solid enough. Is that enough or do I really need the inside bits on?
UK and Europe · Public discussion
These Aldi shoes.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- UK and Europe
- Published
- 26 September 2004
- Last activity
- 27 September 2004
- Original author
- Skunk
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,505
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Skunk said:
I am a tecnho numpty. I've bought a pair of these Aldi shoes. I startedto
follow the instructions but after putting the screws in the bottomof the
shoe. i can't fathom how to put the bits on the inside of theshoe as the
screws don't protrude far enough through for the insidebits to go onto.
Any help appreciated. I have fitted the outside bits and these feelsolid
enough. Is that enough or do I really need the inside bits on?Good grief, cyclingforums really does produce the most
appallingly-formatted articles. If you have a newsreader, point it at
uk.rec.cycling, a much better way to access this newsgroup.Anyway, it seems that the bits that are shown as going inside the shoe
aren't required. The shoe has its own bits already built in, so just
bolt the cleats to those.Daniele
--
Apple Juice Ltd
Chapter Arts Centre
Market Road www.apple-juice.co.uk
Cardiff CF5 1QE 029 2019 0140 -
In news:[email hidden],
D.M. Procida said:
Skunk said:
I am a tecnho numpty. I've bought a pair of these Aldi shoes. I
startedto follow the instructions but after putting the screws in
the bottomof the shoe. i can't fathom how to put the bits on the
inside of theshoe as the screws don't protrude far enough through
for the insidebits to go onto. Any help appreciated. I have fitted
the outside bits and these feelsolid enough. Is that enough or do I
really need the inside bits on?Good grief, cyclingforums really does produce the most
appallingly-formatted articles. If you have a newsreader, point it at
uk.rec.cycling, a much better way to access this newsgroup.Anyway, it seems that the bits that are shown as going inside the shoe
aren't required. The shoe has its own bits already built in, so just
bolt the cleats to those.Daniele
I don't see the start of this thread. Am I doing something wrong with OE, or
is this due to the up-the-spout formatting mentioned by Daniele?I have those shoes. You don't need the inside bits. I put them in my
sandwich. Very tasty.
--
Morton Burner -
Morton Burner said:
In news:[email hidden],
D.M. Procida said:
Skunk said:
I am a tecnho numpty. I've bought a pair of these Aldi shoes. I
startedto follow the instructions but after putting the screws in
the bottomof the shoe. i can't fathom how to put the bits on the
inside of theshoe as the screws don't protrude far enough through
for the insidebits to go onto. Any help appreciated. I have fitted
the outside bits and these feelsolid enough. Is that enough or do I
really need the inside bits on?Good grief, cyclingforums really does produce the most
appallingly-formatted articles. If you have a newsreader, point it at
uk.rec.cycling, a much better way to access this newsgroup.Anyway, it seems that the bits that are shown as going inside the shoe
aren't required. The shoe has its own bits already built in, so just
bolt the cleats to those.Daniele
I don't see the start of this thread. Am I doing something wrong with OE, or
is this due to the up-the-spout formatting mentioned by Daniele?Don't worry ............ some people tend to get a little upset if you
don't do the right 'computer thang' top posting and all that [censored].I see this forum as a place to exchange information and help people,
rather than worry about splellign and computer etiquette ......PEOPLE WHO WORRY ABOUT SUCH THINGS NEED TO GET OUT ON THE BIKE MORE
Sigh ...................
-
Morton Burner said:
Quoted message said:
Good grief, cyclingforums really does produce the most
appallingly-formatted articles. If you have a newsreader, point it at
uk.rec.cycling, a much better way to access this newsgroup.Quoted message said:
I don't see the start of this thread. Am I doing something wrong with OE, or
is this due to the up-the-spout formatting mentioned by Daniele?I don't think so - perhaps that article hasn't arrived at your server
yet, or perhaps it has been cancelled.Daniele
--
Apple Juice Ltd
Chapter Arts Centre
Market Road www.apple-juice.co.uk
Cardiff CF5 1QE 029 2019 0140 -
Jack Ouzzi said:
Quoted message said:
I don't see the start of this thread. Am I doing something wrong with OE, or
is this due to the up-the-spout formatting mentioned by Daniele?Don't worry ............ some people tend to get a little upset if you
don't do the right 'computer thang' top posting and all that [censored].It may be "all that [censored]", but I hardly ever read anything by people
posting from cyclingforums. That's not because I object to their
formatting, but because the way stuff they post appears makes it almost
unreadable.Words at the end of one line and the beginning of the next are joined
together. Paragraphs merge into one. It's not the users' fault, but the
fact is that I usually simply don't bother to read what they have to say
because it's too hard work; all I see is a jumble of text. I expect
other people have the same problem.Daniele
--
Apple Juice Ltd
Chapter Arts Centre
Market Road www.apple-juice.co.uk
Cardiff CF5 1QE 029 2019 0140 -
Quoted message said:
Words at the end of one line and the beginning of the next are joined
together. Paragraphs merge into one. It's not the users' fault, but the
fact is that I usually simply don't bother to read what they have to say
because it's too hard work; all I see is a jumble of text. I expect
other people have the same problem.I'm not getting that problem with any posts appearing as you have described
from cyclingforums posters. I do, however, have a slight gripe when
cyclingforum posters see this uk.rec.cycling as a cyclingforums forum. It
isn't.Cheers, helen s
--This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
to get correct one remove fame & fortune
h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$--Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--
-
Jack Ouzzi said:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:54:19 +0100, "Morton Burner"
<[email hidden]> wrote:Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I don't see the start of this thread. Am I doing something wrong with OE, or
is this due to the up-the-spout formatting mentioned by Daniele?Don't worry ............ some people tend to get a little upset if you
don't do the right 'computer thang' top posting and all that [censored].I see this forum as a place to exchange information and help people,
rather than worry about splellign and computer etiquette ......PEOPLE WHO WORRY ABOUT SUCH THINGS NEED TO GET OUT ON THE BIKE MORE
Well, there is some advantage if everyone puts a little care into
ensuring that their posts are readable and have a consistent and
easily followed train of thought.A
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.