On 26 Nov 2003 08:03:37 -0800, [email hidden] (soft-eng)
Quoted message said:[email hidden] (Kathryn Friesen) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Who constitues this group? Are these the same as hypochrondiacs?
I find these alternative medicine/health forums so interesting as I
never knew there was so much going on. It never occurred to me that my
system could be "out of balance" or that my colon needed irrigating. Or
that I should spend time in an oxygen chamber. Not to mention remove my
fillings, some of which date back to high school.
Here I am, 66 years old & haven't done any of this stuff. What's wrong
with me?
Nothing apparently, and you are lucky.
If you had a disease that your doctor could not find
a cure for, you would yourself be looking for
the right solution.
Of course. If she was somatically hypervigilant and * thought*
(worried well) she had some illness that the MD's could not find then
she would be ripe for some quack to push this treatment or that.
Quoted message said:
Naturally, some people would want to take advantage
of such a search. Other people would want to
help you. The resulting mish-mash would be
what you would find during such a search.
Yes. And the likelihood of getting taking advantage of is quite high
if you went to an alternative provider whose diagnosis would likely
not be either reliable or valid. Without a proper diagnosis, the
treatment is likely to be incorrect.
Quoted message said:
Not very different from MD's either. Some are
good, some are bad. Getting misdiagnosed,
given the wrong medicine or surgery is
not impossible. But chances are, you have
been brainwashed from early childhood to
believe that any MD can do no wrong.
I doubt if many people if any thing that MD's can do no wrong. However
if you have a health problem, a good MD is probably your best bet in
getting a proper diagnosis and treatment.
Conventional medicine tries to make diagnoses that have high
reliability and validity; likewise with the treatments. Alternative
medicine makes diagnoses with dubious validity and reliability. They
use nonspecific terms like "weak immune system" or "toxins" that
cannot be confirmed by objective tests.
They are designed to manipulate their patients into thinking that they
have the answer to the problem. In other words they create a problem
so that they can come up with a solution and the patient pays for it
(in more ways than one).
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:Let's hope you come across no real reason to
learn better...
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance.