"Buck Rogers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:opsut1s0qr6fh0xf@buck-lou6cy5bth...
Quoted message said:All things being equal, can a MTB match a roadster in terms of speed?
The reason I ask is that I've never been able to keep up with a lycra
rider on a roadster, when I'm riding my mtb.
Ok, I'm a newbie, so my fitness level is not that spectacular, and my
MTB is probably only slightly larger than kid size, so the roadsters
have bigger wheels as an advantage.
However, if you put a the same rider on a mtb, then on a roadster, which
machine would be faster? Why? I know the MTB wheels are about 3 times as
wide as the roadsters, so there's drag(however slight), and more contact
with the ground.
What other factors come into play? Do the roadsters have better gear
ratios?
Depends where you're riding. Off road, the mtb will be better. ;^) On road,
schmoadies win out. Light weight (much lighter than mtbs), big gears, no
suspension induced loss of pedalling power (bob), higher pressure tyres, no
knobs (but you can get slicks).
That said, I have beaten schmoadies up hills on road (sure, he mightn't have
known I was racing him, and sure, he might have been nearing the end of a
100 km spin, not near the start of a 10 km blat, but I beat him! ;^) ). I
also noticed the TdF commentators ummm... commenting... that mtb experience
helps schmoadies go down hills faster. I know I overtook a lot on the
downhills last time I entered the Sydney/Gong ride, but again, it wasn't a
race, plus there are lot of inexperienced riders involved.
I do wonder about schmoadie stability on downhills - the guy we passed
heading down Lappo the other day (I was in the car) seemed to be having
trouble holding a line - *lots* of corrections.
But really, it's horses for courses.
Tony F
who should add that he was overtaken off road by a roadie in last year's
Woodford 2 Glenbrook Classic, but got him back when he pinchflatted...