13:02 EDT
Bobby is looking good. He is moving around on his seat trying to get
comfortable. He is wearing a hydration pak on his back which he has
worn in all the major races including the Olympics, but apparently on
the start line the officials weren't happy with him wearing it. He has
no time to take it off, so Scott Sunderland, team director is waiting
to hear what they are going to say about it at the end.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
The UCI: Always looking for the most important issues...
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 21 April 2005
- Last activity
- 22 April 2005
- Original author
- Email address hidden
- Posts
- 9
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 289
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Quoted message said:
13:02 EDT
Bobby is looking good. He is moving around on his seat trying to get
comfortable. He is wearing a hydration pak on his back which he has
worn in all the major races including the Olympics, but apparently on
the start line the officials weren't happy with him wearing it. He has
no time to take it off, so Scott Sunderland, team director is waiting
to hear what they are going to say about it at the end.The UCI might want to be more concerned about what Floyd Landis is doing to
come up with these results, off the same page right now...a.. 1 Floyd Landis (Phonak) 29'58"09
a.. 2 Dave Zabriskie (CSC) 40'17"06
a.. 3 Nathan O'Neill (Navigators) 40'41"09
a.. 4 Brian Vanborg (CSC) 41'46"10Peter
-
typos can make one look sooo.. good.
Read 39 not 29.
Still a great effort! -
"gds" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
typos can make one look sooo.. good.
Read 39 not 29.
Still a great effort!Lance so far down? Will he make this year's tour a lap of honour?
-
Si said:
"gds" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
typos can make one look sooo.. good.
Read 39 not 29.
Still a great effort!Lance so far down? Will he make this year's tour a lap of honour?
So far down? 9th at 1:42 down with 2 mountain stages coming up. Not
perched like a cat but I wouldn't call him "so far down".Especially with 6 of the 8 in front of him being Americans.
GO FLOYD!!!
D
-
gds said:
typos can make one look sooo.. good.
Oooh! And I don't think they've got a test for typos yet!
-
Tim Lines said:
gds said:
typos can make one look sooo.. good.
Oooh! And I don't think they've got a test for typos yet!
When it happens (and it will), RBR got there first. We have the
definitive typo standard. The error in Floy'ds result counts as one (by
the adjaceny rule), the one in the "Mercyx" thread doesn't (by the same
token). -
In article <[email hidden]>,
Stewart Fleming said:
Tim Lines said:
gds said:
typos can make one look sooo.. good.
Oooh! And I don't think they've got a test for typos yet!
When it happens (and it will), RBR got there first. We have the
definitive typo standard. The error in Floy'ds result counts
^^^^^^^Definitive standards indeed! (heh)
--
tanx,
HowardButter is love.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
-
Stewart Fleming said the following on 22/4/2005 14:52:
Quoted message said:
When it happens (and it will), RBR got there first. We have the
definitive typo standard. The error in Floy'ds result counts as one (by
the adjaceny rule), the one in the "Mercyx" thread doesn't (by the same
token).But Mercyx was not a type, the many times is was misspelt in
that post...
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.