rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

The physics behind rail riding and stillstanding?

Started by andrew_carter · · Last activity · 18 posts · 1,890 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
22 April 2004
Last activity
24 April 2004
Original author
andrew_carter
Posts
18
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,890
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–18 of 18
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Some of us Australian trials and muni riders are putting together a
    combined movie project that we plan to sell and that we hope will raise
    awareness, etc of unicycling in Australia. As well as my sectin of the
    movie, I'm making a rail riding tutorial to fit into an extras menu and
    I want it to be useful and to make sence...

    ...so I'd really like to know a little about the physics of rail riding.
    When I'm riding a rail, if I'm falling to the right then I'll throw my
    arms and upper body to the right to somehow regain my balance. Could
    somebody please tell me what's going on here? Being higher above the
    ground, and often heavier, I would have thought that the upper body
    would pull the rider even further off balance if it was moved in the
    direction he/she was falling. Or is it that when the rider moves their
    upper body to the right, they are pushing their lower body to the left,
    and keeping their weight over the rail?

    Also, I've sometimes found myself swinging one arm in circles in a final
    attempt to regain balance, and sometimes it's worked. Actually, I just
    looked at a video of a rail I rode once and it's sometimes more of a
    push of the arm from the back to the front. In the case I just observed
    I was falling to the right and I did this action with my right arm to
    regain balance. Can someone please explain this?

    And one last thing, is the forward momentum doing anything to keep the
    rider upright? Should narrow rail riding (with no lateral wheel
    movement) be any easier than stillstanding?

    I've attached some frames fro ma video to try to explain the actions I'm
    referring to.

    Thanks a lot. I'm sure I could attempt to analyse these goings-on
    myself but I'd rather hear even the basic stuff from somebody who knows
    what they're talking about.

    Thanks,
    Andrew

    +----------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Attachment filename: rail.jpg |
    |Download attachment: http://www.unicyclist.com/attachment/205085|
    +----------------------------------------------------------------+

    --
    andrew_carter - www.unicycles.com.au

    HTTP://WWW.UNICYCLIST.COM/GALLERY/ANDREW
    andrew_carter (at) mail (dot) com
    http://www.unicycles.com.au
    New photos added 11/04 - http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albuu61
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    andrew_carter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1052
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  2. I'm not particularly good at riding rails, but from the physics point of
    view the idea of swinging the arms is that the reaction from your arms
    swinging moves your weight in the opposite direction, in the same way
    that you can do sharp turns y swinging your amrs around you, just in a
    different axis.
    I think its also important that the arms are aove your head, which means
    they are further away from the pivot (the bottom of the tyre) so the
    force from swinging your arms produces enough of a moment (turning
    force) to regain your balance without moving your cnetre of gravity even
    further over to the point that you fall anyway.
    I suppose that technically with no lateral movement a rail should be the
    same as a still stand, but with most rails the thickness of the tyre
    might mean you can move a little to regain balance. From the pictures
    you can probably answer that better than me.🙂

    Hope that helps,

    John

    --
    johnhimsworth - Falling off with style...

    What if the hokey cokey really is what it's all about?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnhimsworth's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1788
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  3. Yes, that was helpful, thanks John. I think that with rails that size
    and smaller any lateral wheel movement is unintentional for me.

    Keep the explanations coming!

    Andrew

    --
    andrew_carter - www.unicycles.com.au

    HTTP://WWW.UNICYCLIST.COM/GALLERY/ANDREW
    andrew_carter (at) mail (dot) com
    http://www.unicycles.com.au
    New photos added 11/04 - http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albuu61
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    andrew_carter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1052
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  4. Hi Andrew,

    Sounds like a neat project. I don't have much time now but I'll give it
    some thought and post later. One of the stillstanding threads had a
    good discussion of what is going on. You're on the right track with
    your hunches. (Oh - sorry about the double pun... 🙂 )

    Tim

    --
    cyberbellum - Level 1.0 rider!

    Optimists think the glass is half full. Pesimists think the glass is
    half empty. Engineers think the glass is too big.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    cyberbellum's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4550
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  5. When you throw your upper body to the right, it throws your lower body
    (including the wheel) to the left.

    --
    James_Potter - Rettop_Semaj

    -[censored], [censored], [censored]!!-
    -- Kris Holm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    James_Potter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3807
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  6. Conservation of momentum: Your total momentmum must be the same at all
    times in the left right direction, so if you give your arms momentum to
    the left, then the rest of you must go to the right to 'cancel' the
    momentum to the left.

    Same concept as throwing something heavy when you're standing on really
    slippery ice: the thing you threw goes one way (Like your arms) and you
    go the other way (Like your torso and uni).

    --
    rabbidous - Level 1.8

    The Great Rabbidous has spoken. Muah ha ha haaaaaaaaaa.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rabbidous's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5583
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  7. Aah, one of Newton's big scary laws:
    every action has an equal and an opposite reaction.
    (that's my thinking done for the day)

    --
    theamazingmolio - A Unicylist, a juggler, and a prat

    Luke Duller ([email hidden])
    Never trust anything you read on the internet
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    theamazingmolio's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5931
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  8. Okay thanks, but how about these ones...

    "Also, I've sometimes found myself swinging one arm in circles in a
    final attempt to regain balance, and sometimes it's worked. Actually, I
    just looked at a video of a rail I rode once and it's sometimes more of
    a push of the arm from the back to the front. In the case I just
    observed I was falling to the right and I did this action with my right
    arm to regain balance. Can someone please explain this?"

    "And one last thing, is the forward momentum doing anything to keep the
    rider upright?"

    And I noticed that the guy (in the Moab section) riding that brown rail
    seems to prefer to keep his upper body very low. This seems strange to
    me.

    I found a good clip yesterday to add to the tutorial. It's just me
    stillstanding on a wooden rail but you can see clearly how I'm trying to
    push my hips to the side by moving my upper body to the other side.

    Andrew

    --
    andrew_carter - www.unicycles.com.au

    HTTP://WWW.UNICYCLIST.COM/GALLERY/ANDREW
    andrew_carter (at) mail (dot) com
    http://www.unicycles.com.au
    New photos added 11/04 - http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albuu61
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    andrew_carter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1052
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  9. andrew_carter said:

    *Should narrow rail riding (with no lateral wheel movement) be any
    easier than stillstanding?*


    Of course. In a stillstand you are not allowed the freedom to roll
    forward and back. The rolling also allows you to make some left-right
    corrections with slight changes in your line.

    There is the whole Newton's law and conservation of energy/momentum
    issue, but this doesn't explain how a Kris Holm can spend 3 minutes
    stillstanding on a piece of railroad track. Clearly he was doing
    something the rest of us were not.

    Add *time* to the physics info from above. I believe that is a factor.
    Also if you make your body movements in a wave, that kind of gets wider
    as it goes up. Those are two brief descriptions of how I think you get
    around the normal laws of physics to balance where common sense says you
    can't.

    --
    johnfoss - Walkin' on the edge

    John Foss, the Uni-Cyclone
    "jfoss" at "unicycling.com"
    www.unicycling.com

    "Hey, could I have some of that spinach? I need to get this pork rind
    taste out of my mouth." -- Ryan Atkins to Kris Holm, on the way back
    from Moab after sampling some of my pork rinds. They grossed out the
    whole van!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  10. Did i read that right? THREE MINUTES? is there a special technique for
    stillstands?

    --
    TheBadger587 - Level 4

    Well i Guess not the retarded ones... but how could you even say
    something like that? jeez cleveland, there's edgy and then theres
    offensive. Good day sir!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TheBadger587's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5576
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  11. This would be easier with pictures, but I haven't figured out how to do
    that easily in a regular post so here goes:

    Imagine two vertically elongated masses with one stacked on top of the
    other and joined together with a powered hinge. The lower mass
    represents your legs, hips and the unicycle. The upper mass represents
    your torso, head and arms. The hinge and power source are your waist
    and abdominal/back muscles.

    Since you can roll on a thin rail you can control your fore and aft
    balance with normal pedaling. This frees your abdominal/back muscles
    from the need to balance a still stand in that direction so there is
    more "power" for still-standing in the lateral direction.

    So, imagine that you are looking down the rail. Mentally "float" the
    two mass system an inch over the rail. ("Matrix" physics rules are in
    effect - gravity is suspended.) Imagine the system is perfectly still
    and aligned perfectly straight and vertical. What happens if the hinge
    "motors" are actuated to bend the top to the right? Conservation of
    momentum (Newton's first law) says that the center of mass stays put,
    since there are no externally applied forces (the "tire" isn't touching
    the rail). Further, there is no reason for the system to rotate as a
    whole since there are no externally applied torques either. So the top
    and bottom of the system move to the right, and the waist moves to the
    left. The center of mass of the upper mass stays on the vertical line
    but moves down, and the center of mass of the lower mass stays on the
    line and moves up. The overall center of mass stays put.

    Now, mentally straighten the masses out again and turn gravity on. The
    mass system drops onto the rail and balances. If everthing is PERFECTLY
    alligned it will just stay there, however this perfection is only
    possible in cartoons and computer simulations. In the real world it
    will never happen. Eventually it will begin to rotate around the
    contact point on the rail and fall. Why?

    With gravity turned on the mass system pushes down on the rail, and the
    rail in turn pushes up on the mass system. When the system is perfectly
    vertical these two pushes are exactly in alignment and cancel out. When
    the mass system tips, even a tiny amount, the two pushes become slightly
    offset. This creates something called a "couple" in physics that
    creates a pure twisting force or "torque". Since these forces are
    externally applied Newton's second law comes into effect - the masses
    accelerate. As the masses tip they also start to accelerate sideways
    because the rail "up" push is no longer exactly vertical.

    Now imagine that the masses are still aligned straight with each other
    but have tipped a tiny bit to the right. What happens if the "motor" in
    the waist is actuated to rotate the top mass strongly to the right?

    In the zero gravity thought experiment the top part rotated to the right
    and the lower part rotated to the left. But in the gravity-on case the
    "tire" is in contact with the "rail" so the bottop part isn't free to
    rotate anymore. In the free-air this floating tire tread would have
    moved to the right too, but since it is in contact it can't, so the
    whole system is pulled to the left.

    Now, mentally stop time: What happens if you bend the system at the
    waist and then straighten it in the same instant? The answer is
    nothing. It will go back to exactly how it was. So managing time must
    be part of the solution for still standing. Ok, start time again:

    When the tire patch causes the system to move to the left it causes the
    center of mass to move to the LEFT of the rail. Now the tipping couple
    is reversed and the masses start to fall to the left. After a suitable
    period of time imagine the motor is actuated again to straighten the
    system. This causes the center of mass to move to the right, but since
    the masses spent some time falling to the left it doesn't go back to
    where it started from. If the timing and movements are done perfectly
    the center of mass will wind up right over the rail and the system is
    back in balance.

    So what about the arm windmilling? Well, it's the same thing but with
    three masses (and a new powered hinge at the shoulder.) When you start
    your arm rotation you cause the tire to pull your center of gravity one
    way, and when you stop the rotation it pulls you the other way. Get the
    timing right and you stay over the rail.

    This form of balance isn't limited to unicycleing. Watch any good
    soccer player in slow motion and you will see the arm-swings and waist
    bends helping him (or her) maneuver. Or just go down to the bar and
    watch the really drunk folks - since their balance and timing systems
    are impared you can see in an exagerated sense the waist bends and arm
    swings that we all do to just stand and walk on our feet.

    Hope it helps. For the video I'd have an illustrator make some
    animations. Long leather coats optional for the "Matrix" physics
    section.

    Tim

    --
    cyberbellum - Level 1.0 rider!

    Optimists think the glass is half full. Pesimists think the glass is
    half empty. Engineers think the glass is too big.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    cyberbellum's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4550
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  12. In my opinion, I think that one of the most important points to mention
    in any video would be to explain that the primary focus of balance when
    doing stillstands and riding railings (or for that matter any other
    unicycling move) is not your arms- it's your core. Developing a good
    sense of core balance will do way more for still stands than
    concentrating on balancing with your arms.

    This means thinking in terms of shifting your hips around to maintain
    balance, rather than just flapping your arms.

    Kris.

    --
    danger_uni - Kris Holm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    danger_uni's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/21
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  13. Thankyou very much guys, that combined was exactly what I was looking
    for. Of course in a short tutorial on rail riding which will rely only
    of video, maybe a diagram, and text (because I don't have a microphone)
    I can't go into too much detail at all but all of that info has really
    helped me to understand what's going on. I just need to practise now.

    I find stillstands and rail riding easier when sitting down on my trials
    uni (rather than either sitting or standing on my freestyle uni with a
    high seat). It's clear to me now why that is.

    Thanks a lot,
    Andrew

    --
    andrew_carter - www.unicycles.com.au

    HTTP://WWW.UNICYCLIST.COM/GALLERY/ANDREW
    andrew_carter (at) mail (dot) com
    http://www.unicycles.com.au
    New photos added 11/04 - http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albuu61
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    andrew_carter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1052
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  14. andrew you for all the pictures you take, you should start making a lot
    more short clips!!!!!!!!!!

    your fan, George

    --
    gpickett00 - Level 3.7

    Bicycle is just a short way of saying unicycle with a training wheel.
    'Our unicycling videos' (http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albuv95)

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gpickett00's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5654
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  15. Jack Wiley has a line in "The Unicycle Book" that goes:
    Trying to maintain balance by wild arm and body motions is something
    like trying to balance a wet noodle.

    Unfortunately, that's exactly what you have to do when still standing or
    riding a rail. In normal riding the object is to keep the wheel
    underneath you. When still standing or riding a rail the object is to
    keep yourself over the wheel. It's opposite of the way that you
    normally ride. Learning to ride on a rail requires learning a new way
    of doing balance corrections. It's not like normal riding at all.

    That's the gist of what you want to get across to the lay person.
    That's why riding on a rail is difficult and a feat of balance while
    normal riding is not so difficult and doesn't require extraordinary
    balance.

    --
    john_childs - Guinness Mojo

    john_childs (at) hotmail (dot) com
    Gallery: '' (http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/john_childs)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  16. Yes, that's what I've been telling any of my unicycling friends who have
    wanted to learn to ride rails in the past. I think it's a very
    important point that instead of keeping the wheel beneath you you're
    keeping yourself over the wheel.

    George,
    I have many many many clips on my computer from the movie we've been
    filming. I'll put a downloadable version of the movie up when it's done
    (very soon...just sorting out music now). Thanks for the kind words but
    I'm really not fan-worthy. 🙂

    Andrew

    --
    andrew_carter - www.unicycles.com.au

    HTTP://WWW.UNICYCLIST.COM/GALLERY/ANDREW
    andrew_carter (at) mail (dot) com
    http://www.unicycles.com.au
    New photos added 11/04 - http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/albuu61
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    andrew_carter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1052
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  17. andrew_carter said:

    *I'm really not fan-worthy.

    Andrew *

    That's a lie and you know it!

    --
    gerblefranklin - Trials Unicyclist

    Don't you think it's a cruel irony that acting like a G.I. Joe in the
    army can get you a Medal, while playing with one can get you thrown out?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gerblefranklin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4295
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/31966

  18. andrew_carter said:

    I'm really not fan-worthy. 🙂

    Andrew, I'm a fan of you!

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    Clearly a system of 1/14 and 1/16 is not decimal - Mikefule on the English weight system

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.