The Hamilton PR Bluff

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

So much for Tyler's statements to the BBC that Phonak was behind him. And
the Phonak panel of experts did not conclude that the blood doping test is
not valid.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/nov04/nov30news1

Will Tyler now "tell all?"

Actually I'm waiting for Lafferty to tell all. For instance, how did
these doctors on the panel conclude that the tests couldn't return a
false reading? I mean, since the WADA isn't saying which antigens
they're looking for how is it possible to say that they can't be
triggered in some manner to give incorrect results.

After all, the tests are based on a very small test group which didn't
contain any controls at all and two of that group tested negative
despite being known positives.

"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

So much for Tyler's statements to the BBC that Phonak was behind him.
And
the Phonak panel of experts did not conclude that the blood doping test
is
not valid.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/nov04/nov30news1

Will Tyler now "tell all?"

Actually I'm waiting for Lafferty to tell all. For instance, how did
these doctors on the panel conclude that the tests couldn't return a
false reading? I mean, since the WADA isn't saying which antigens
they're looking for how is it possible to say that they can't be
triggered in some manner to give incorrect results.

After all, the tests are based on a very small test group which didn't
contain any controls at all and two of that group tested negative
despite being known positives.

Yada, yada, yada.

Tom Kunich said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

So much for Tyler's statements to the BBC that Phonak was behind

him. And

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the Phonak panel of experts did not conclude that the blood doping

test is

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

not valid.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/nov04/nov30news1

Will Tyler now "tell all?"

Actually I'm waiting for Lafferty to tell all. For instance, how did
these doctors on the panel conclude that the tests couldn't return a
false reading? I mean, since the WADA isn't saying which antigens
they're looking for how is it possible to say that they can't be
triggered in some manner to give incorrect results.

After all, the tests are based on a very small test group which

didn't

Quoted message said:

contain any controls at all and two of that group tested negative
despite being known positives.

I do not believe I actually agree with both Brian and Tom at the same
time. That is almost disturbing.

Scott

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

So much for Tyler's statements to the BBC that Phonak was behind him. And
the Phonak panel of experts did not conclude that the blood doping test is
not valid.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/nov04/nov30news1

Will Tyler now "tell all?"

I believe TH has not hit bottom yet. I give his marriage 1 year at the
most.
Everything i have read suggest that TH's inlaws never trusted him in
the early days. I will guarantee those feelings have resurfaced.
Apartments in Spain & Audi wagons vs. honesty & character.

Evan Evans said:

Everything i have read suggest that TH's inlaws never trusted him in
the early days.

this is the place where you provide links to such reading.

"gym gravity" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Evan Evans said:

Everything i have read suggest that TH's inlaws never trusted him in
the early days.

this is the place where you provide links to such reading.

Quite right, or at least the source if not available on line. I do recall
an interview with Haven and Tyler in which she said her parents were
skeptical of her being involved with a bicycle racer. Could they be blamed
for that? Where's OMC for an expert opinion on this??

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

Evan Evans said:

Apartments in Spain & Audi wagons vs. honesty & character.

Thanks, I'll have the apartment and the Audi and could you send me a C50
or Dogma while you're about it.

Watch that your Karma doesn't run over your Dogma.

--
tanx,
Howard

"You ain't having fun until you're dialing 911"
Atomic 7

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Evan Evans said:

Apartments in Spain & Audi wagons vs. honesty & character.

Thanks, I'll have the apartment and the Audi and could you send me a C50
or Dogma while you're about it.

Evan Evans said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Apartments in Spain & Audi wagons vs. honesty & character.

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

Thanks, I'll have the apartment and the Audi and could you send me a C50
or Dogma while you're about it.

Howard Kveck said:

Watch that your Karma doesn't run over your Dogma.

By an MTB:
http://www.kendausa.com/bicycle/crosscountry.cfm?p=03

Anyway my Karma is practising bunny hops.

Donald Munro said:

By an MTB:
http://www.kendausa.com/bicycle/crosscountry.cfm?p=03

Anyway my Karma is practising bunny hops.

Really just shows what happens when alliteration gets completely out
of hand.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...