Serious question, not an attempt to start a flame war:
At the world cup final, the Marseillaise was played and the camera panned
along the faces of the French team. Of them, apart from Zidane, who was
born in Algeria, and Barthez, the clown the French put in goal to keep
the crowd entertained, every single face was black. So France isn't
short of black sportsmen. Indeed, go to any European athletics event and
you'll see that most countries field a high proportion of black
athletes.
As is frequently noted on this group, the United States has its fair
share of cycle racers - and, in most sports in the US, black athletes do
extremely well. Francophone Africa isn't short of cycle racing - indeed,
the ASO, the people who run the Tour de France, also run the Tour of
Burkina-Faso, a country which has no less than thirteen cycling
academies. In endurance sports such as marathon, black athletes do well.
The last five winners of the London Marathon have been from Ethiopia or
Kenya. So there's nothing genetic about being black which makes you
unsuitable for endurance.
Watching the Giro, this May, it was with surprise that I noticed that
there was a black rider riding in the peloton. Just one, but there was
one. In this year's Tour de France, as usual, none.
Why not? Why is cycling a sport at which black athletes don't seem able
to excel? Is cycling systematically racist, preventing good black
youngsters from getting a chance? If not, what is the reason?
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; Our modern industrial economy takes a mountain covered with trees,
;; lakes, running streams and transforms it into a mountain of junk,
;; garbage, slime pits, and debris. -- Edward Abbey