Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

The Cars That Ate Adelaide...

Started by Gemma_k · · Last activity · 7 posts · 779 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
18 May 2006
Last activity
23 May 2006
Original author
Gemma_k
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
779
Views / 30 days
14

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19186133%255E2682,00.html

    http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19185431%255E2682,00.html

    and to put your $0.55c to good use, phone 1900 966 330 to vote "yes" to "Do
    you Support Jane Lomax-Smith's proposal to make the city car free on
    Sundays?" - by 3pm ACST (3:30pm AEST) (Or 1900 966 331 to vote "no"😉

    There isn't a phone line to vote "Why didn't Lomax-Smith do this when she
    was Lord Mayor" ;-)

  2. On 2006-05-18, Gemma_k (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19186133%255E2682,00.html

    http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,19185431%255E2682,00.html

    ==> RAA spokesman Adam Thomson said yesterday the state's lead motoring
    ==> body recognised there were moves to add more vibrancy to the city.
    ==>
    ==> "RAA members are walkers and cyclists as well," he said.

    Wow. RAA are more sane than RACV. RACV would be jumping up and down
    and frothing at the mouth.

    --
    TimC
    "pretty much, my thesis can be reduced to the letter tau" -- TimC

  3. "Michael Warner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    TimC said:

    ==> RAA spokesman Adam Thomson said yesterday the state's lead motoring
    ==> body recognised there were moves to add more vibrancy to the city.
    ==>
    ==> "RAA members are walkers and cyclists as well," he said.

    Wow. RAA are more sane than RACV. RACV would be jumping up and down
    and frothing at the mouth.

    He didn't say that the RAA /approved/ of the moves.


    FYI, The results of the phone poll were 70% NOT in favour of car free days
    in the City of Adelaide.

  4. Gemma_k said:

    "Michael Warner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    TimC said:

    ==> RAA spokesman Adam Thomson said yesterday the state's lead motoring
    ==> body recognised there were moves to add more vibrancy to the city.
    ==>
    ==> "RAA members are walkers and cyclists as well," he said.

    Wow. RAA are more sane than RACV. RACV would be jumping up and down
    and frothing at the mouth.


    He didn't say that the RAA /approved/ of the moves.


    FYI, The results of the phone poll were 70% NOT in favour of car free days
    in the City of Adelaide.

    For someone who grew up in Adelaide and got his
    cycling legs riding through the hills, this is
    a tragic result. 70% against closing the centre
    of the city.

    Reminds me of the arguments about turning Rundle
    St into a mall. The local traders were dead against
    it as it would, they said, adversely affect trade.
    It turned out to have the opposite effect. And it's
    not surprising really. Imagine: someone drives past
    John Martins (now gone), sees a dummy with a nice
    frock so pulls over to go buy it? Pulls over where?
    Street parking was long gone even in the 70s.

    Depressed.

    DeF.

    --
    e-mail: d.farrow@your finger.murdoch.edu.au
    To reply, you'll have to remove your finger.

  5. In aus.bicycle on Tue, 23 May 2006 14:49:50 +0800

    DeF said:

    For someone who grew up in Adelaide and got his
    cycling legs riding through the hills, this is
    a tragic result. 70% against closing the centre
    of the city.

    If you grew up there you must know how most city traffic is through
    traffic. Sure, there are bypasses, but many people find that the best
    way to get where they are going (such as the sports fields, uni, zoo,
    North Adelaide, and even points well north) is hey diddle diddle,
    straight up the middle.

    be interesting to know how much is through traffic but when I lived
    there the answer was "lots".

    Zebee

  6. Zebee Johnstone said:

    In aus.bicycle on Tue, 23 May 2006 14:49:50 +0800

    DeF said:

    For someone who grew up in Adelaide and got his
    cycling legs riding through the hills, this is
    a tragic result. 70% against closing the centre
    of the city.

    If you grew up there you must know how most city traffic is through
    traffic. Sure, there are bypasses, but many people find that the best
    way to get where they are going (such as the sports fields, uni, zoo,
    North Adelaide, and even points well north) is hey diddle diddle,
    straight up the middle.

    be interesting to know how much is through traffic but when I lived
    there the answer was "lots".

    Zebee

    Hmm. Can't say I really noticed this but then I lived in the
    hills and I went somewhere I usually went around the city.
    Fullerton Rd, South Tce and West Tce spring to mind. Certainly
    roads like Glen Osmond Rd, Anzac Hwy and Port Rd dump a heap
    of traffic on the city. I can see that King William Rd would be
    a major throughfare (note that this was closed off for the TdU
    final crit this year).

    Still, after the TdU this year, it's a disappointing result.

    DeF.

    --
    e-mail: d.farrow@your finger.murdoch.edu.au
    To reply, you'll have to remove your finger.

  7. Gemma_k said:


    FYI, The results of the phone poll were 70% NOT in favour of car free days
    in the City of Adelaide.

    Actually, considering there was no mentionof the Adelaide Crows in the poll I'm impressed that 30% voted for it!

    Given a more attracive model perhaps it would be closer to 50/50?
    after all, it usually takes approx 39-42% to get a liberal governement so based upon Democracy2.1™ that should be foine 🙄

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.