Thanks much

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

Balls in your court.

...............

Kiss my ass and call it love story.

smn

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

Stephen, I hope you will find Christ sooner than you have found the exit door, for several days
now, you have informed us on SCM that you are taking.

I realize how much you want him to leave so you can have the group all to yourself. You don't need
to keep reminding us of your desire.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I believe we are done now.

We will see, won't we?

You hope. <g> Matt

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

I replied to the email you sent me since you were no longer supposed to be involved in SMC

We all know how much you want him to leave. You are proving my other thread is correct. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

Whose the troll now?

You are, judging from your repeated posts. Matt

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

I gave you a hefty list of topics Chung could not have expertise in and, now, and again, I ask you
to quiz me on them.

For what possible *good* reason would anyone want to quiz Mu_cus? As=20 though getting answers from
an anonymous and, therefore, nutless=20 wonder would matter.

Mu_lcter talks about how this is just usenet and not the real world.=20 Mu_sic from Intestines says
he can't identify anyone on usenet and, of=20 course, that's correct, if trivially stupid. The
combination of usenet=20 identity and real world name and info makes identification rather=20 easy.
Hence, his timorous fear at having his real name exposed. Poor=20 scared Mu_liebrity. Dictionary
time again, Mu_gger.

Just as anyone who hides so assiduously as Mu_stard Plaster does=20 cannot easily be identified. But
the real question is about the value=20 of the identity at all. Mu_lch has so often shown a
propensity merely=20 for trollery that finding the real name of this sort of skulking fake=20 has no
value to anyone. It simply doesn't matter who the cowardly=20 phony behind the screen name is.

Quoted message said:

Stephen, this is your chance to either be a hero to the trolls who have duped you into believing
Mu-Chung or it will be your Usenet undoing.

<Bring up Wagnerian music - cue echo machine> YOUR [YOur YOur your]=20 USENET [USENet USenet Usenet]
UNDOING [UNDOing UNdoing Undoing].

How important and deep this is. Mu_lberry makes it all so desperately=20 SIGNIFICANT. Like the
little guy behind the curtain pushing the levers=20 to make sound and fury. And sound and fury is
all it is.

Quoted message said:

Time to face the piper that you called into being.

Bwahahahaha. This is linguistic incompetence of a new order. The=20 clich=E9 is "pay the piper" and
has nothing to do with this sort of=20 discourse. Maybe Mu_cilage meant "face the music" but that's
equally=20 inappropriate. And that "called into being" thing is simply funny=20 without making any
sense. Poor Mu_dpie. So illiterate he can't even=20 sort out his crutches and clich=E9s.

Quoted message said:

Balls in your court.

But poor Mu_dlark has no balls in his court. I wonder if his=20 dictionary has "mudlark" in it.

This M-U thing is fun. There are lots of appropriate words like that.

And the funniest part of it all is that "mu" means "nothing." Even=20 better than when he called
himself "fishbone" in French. Notice how=20 quickly he stopped using that one. <LOL>

Pastorio

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

Seriously, are you EVER going to leave?

You need to stop preaching about how much you need him to leave. We are all aware of your true
motive. You don't need to keep reminding us that you can't stand other opinions.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Because this is cyber-space. And in cyber-space if I do not click on you name, you do not exist.

Bye!

You need to stop preaching about how much you need him to leave. We are all aware of your true
motive. You don't need to keep reminding us that you can't stand other opinions.

Quoted message said:

I gave you a hefty list of topics Chung could not have expertise in and, now, and again, I ask you
to quiz me on them.

These are clearly off topic, and he respects that. We all know that YOU do not respect others at
all. You keep INSISTING that he post off topic. Thank you for again demonstrating to all of how
intolerant you are.

Quoted message said:

Balls in your court.

You've completely missed all the balls sent to you, and you're asking for it again? . You really
like being a martyr, don't you. Matt

On 30 Dec 2003 09:03:39 -0800, [email hidden] (Dr. Andrew B.

Chung said:

Quoted message said:

Then please stop e-mailing me. Lunch with you and Chung at Blimpies in Mableton, Georgia. Get
real, troll.

You seem fearful, neighbor.

ROTFL. Delusions again, I see. Matt

On 30 Dec 2003 08:35:16 -0800, [email hidden] (Dr. Andrew B.

Chung said:

Quoted message said:

We are done when I say we are.

You think it is all about you, don't you?

We all know who YOU think it is about. <ggg>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Because this is cyber-space. And in cyber-space if I do not click on you name, you do not exist.

The ostrich effect.

You don't get it.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bye!

In a word... *fear*

ROTFL. Delusions again. Matt

Stephen Nagler said:

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

Balls in your court.

Kiss my ass and call it love story.

Poor Mu_ff likes to "challenge" people and take the offensive, while making sure never to actually
put himself in a position of having to put up or shut up.

That $10,000 Mu/Chung meeting business is a good example. A while back he found himself in the
situation of having someone take him up on it. He squirmed and wiggled and finally just stopped
responding. Then he "disappeared" for a while, as he does when it gets too hot, and reappears with
new axes to grind.

He's big and brave and tells the NG's how he's such a stud who trains famous athletes and goes to
Iraq and talks to prisoners even though he doesn't speak any of the languages Iraqis do and he
believes what they tell him. He does his tough guy routine from the safety of anonymity. Very
believable, huh?

He promotes the 2PoundPOWDiet with the same "science" as Chung does and with the same oh-so-
convincing assertions of huge success with no failure. Except his "friend" Mel Hall (MD, "she" says)
says that her MD ex-husband has tried it with patients of his and *most* get good results. And
*most* stick with it. Sorta blows that infallibility they like to imply out of the water.

There's a FAQ out there somewhere (anybody?) that lists some of his names and utterly hilarious
trollery. Poor guy *can't* say who he is now. Too many people would laugh at him. It would be worse
than death to a phony swaggerer like that.

Pastorio

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:06:44 -0500, Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Poor Mu_ff likes to "challenge" people and take the offensive, while making sure never to actually
put himself in a position of having to put up or shut up.

He gets his butt whipped on a regular basis. <g> He can't stand the heat in the kitchen, so he
leaves. <gg> Matt

Dr. Andrew B. Chung said:

Stephen Nagler <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

According to you, we were "done" several days ago.

...........

Then please stop e-mailing me. Lunch with you and Chung at Blimpies in Mableton, Georgia. Get
real, troll.

You seem fearful, neighbor.

Refusing to eat with Chung and Mu_sical chairs is fearful? I'd say it was a sudden acquisition
of good judgement and taste. Not at all surprising that Mu_dslinger would think that Blimpies
is uptown.

The two 2pounders would have to split a 6-incher. Like always.

Pastorio

Quoted message said:

Mu_nrise Through The Shadow said:

I replied to the email you sent me since you were no longer supposed to be involved in SMC

And I bet he did it for Stephen's "convenience."

Quoted message said:

We all know how much you want him to leave. You are proving my other thread is correct. Thanks.

Quoted message said:

Whose the troll now?

Try "Who's the troll now?" It won't change the answer, but it will be less illiterate.

Quoted message said:

You are, judging from your repeated posts.

Matt, I'm shocked and astonished at your picking on Mu_ffin. And outraged. In that order. No, wait.
It's astonished, outraged and shocked.

Um, that's not it, either. Hang on. I'm amazed, stunned and, er, amused. Yeah. That's it. Except for
the amazed and stunned part.

Pastorio

Quoted message said:

Bob Pastorio said:

Poor Mu_ff likes to "challenge" people and take the offensive, while making sure never to actually
put himself in a position of having to put up or shut up.

He gets his butt whipped on a regular basis. <g> He can't stand the heat in the kitchen, so he
leaves. <gg>

Uh-oh. You said "kitchen." Now he's going to troll the 2PoundPOWDiet again.

I bet he gets the 6-incher at Blimpies. Think of it as a round trip for him.

Pastorio

On 30 Dec 2003 09:03:39 -0800, [email hidden] (Dr. Andrew B.

Chung said:

Quoted message said:

Then please stop e-mailing me. Lunch with you and Chung at Blimpies in Mableton, Georgia. Get
real, troll.

You seem fearful, neighbor.

You think he fears you, me or Blimpie's?

antwrp.gsfc.nasa.govap031122.htmlOpen ↗ Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:28:43 GMT, Stephen Nagler <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Kiss my ass and call it love story.

antwrp.gsfc.nasa.govap031122.htmlOpen ↗ Lift well, Eat less, Walk fast, Live long.

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:30:09 -0500, Mu_nrise Through The Shadow wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

MD/PhD) said:

Quoted message said:

Then please stop e-mailing me. Lunch with you and Chung at Blimpies in Mableton, Georgia. Get
real, troll.

You seem fearful, neighbor.

You think he fears you, me or Blimpie's?

You jerks... Dr. Nagler has credentials and recognition that neither of you can even dream of. He
probably "fears" for his good name to even be seen with such bottom feeding nonentities as
yourselves.

Blimpies, indeed. How apropos. Maybe you could offer to take him to your favorite local Peep Show
there in Marbleton to sweeten the offer.

--

Steve

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:30:42 -0500, Bob Pastorio wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bob Pastorio said:

Poor Mu_ff likes to "challenge" people and take the offensive, while making sure never to
actually put himself in a position of having to put up or shut up.

He gets his butt whipped on a regular basis. <g> He can't stand the heat in the kitchen, so he
leaves. <gg>

Uh-oh. You said "kitchen." Now he's going to troll the 2PoundPOWDiet again.

I bet he gets the 6-incher at Blimpies. Think of it as a round trip for him.

As long as he doesn't get more than 4 of them, he will remain within the Scientifically Proscribed
Guidelines of the Two Foot Diet.

BTW, have you noticed that Chung is now recommending the Two Ounce POW Diet to that poor gullible
soul Francis Spoon? Yeah, that'll fix what ails him :-) I'm going to have to invent the Two Inch POW
Diet if this goes any further :-)

--

Steve

Steve said:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:30:42 -0500, Bob Pastorio wrote (in message
<[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:06:44 -0500, Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Poor Mu_ff likes to "challenge" people and take the offensive, while making sure never to
>actually put himself in a position of having to put up or shut up.

He gets his butt whipped on a regular basis. <g> He can't stand the heat in the kitchen, so he
leaves. <gg>

Uh-oh. You said "kitchen." Now he's going to troll the 2PoundPOWDiet again.

I bet he gets the 6-incher at Blimpies. Think of it as a round trip for him.

As long as he doesn't get more than 4 of them, he will remain within the Scientifically Proscribed
Guidelines of the Two Foot Diet.

BTW, have you noticed that Chung is now recommending the Two Ounce POW Diet to that poor gullible
soul Francis Spoon? Yeah, that'll fix what ails him :-) I'm going to have to invent the Two Inch
POW Diet if this goes any further :-)

Might not work any better than Two Ounce POW Diet. I think Francis would be more familiar with the
metric system. The conversions get kind of clunky. I mean the Five Centimeter diet loses that
essential twoness of the others. Perhaps there's a unit of some sort out there that would permit the
continued use of two as the guideline. Maybe two handfuls. Worth a thought.

Pas-two-rio

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:42:32 -0500, Bob Pastorio wrote
(in message <[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

Steve said:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:30:42 -0500, Bob Pastorio wrote (in message
<[email hidden]>😉:

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:06:44 -0500, Bob Pastorio <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>> Poor Mu_ff likes to "challenge" people and take the offensive, while making sure never to
>> actually put himself in a position of having to put up or shut up.
>
> He gets his butt whipped on a regular basis. <g> He can't stand the heat in the kitchen, so he
> leaves. <gg>

Uh-oh. You said "kitchen." Now he's going to troll the 2PoundPOWDiet again.

I bet he gets the 6-incher at Blimpies. Think of it as a round trip for him.

As long as he doesn't get more than 4 of them, he will remain within the Scientifically
Proscribed Guidelines of the Two Foot Diet.

BTW, have you noticed that Chung is now recommending the Two Ounce POW Diet to that poor gullible
soul Francis Spoon? Yeah, that'll fix what ails him :-) I'm going to have to invent the Two Inch
POW Diet if this goes any further :-)

Might not work any better than Two Ounce POW Diet. I think Francis would be more familiar with the
metric system. The conversions get kind of clunky. I mean the Five Centimeter diet loses that
essential twoness of the others. Perhaps there's a unit of some sort out there that would permit
the continued use of two as the guideline. Maybe two handfuls. Worth a thought.

Pas-two-rio

... Visualize your food... you are two with the food... you and the food are two... ommmm....

--

Steve

John9212112 said:

Quoted message said:

From: Stephen Nagler [email hidden]

Quoted message said:

I have re-read through all the threads I participated in and would like to offer you a thought.
Whether or not you believe in Jesus, do take time to speak *directly* with God - be you
Christian, Jew, Buddhist, Moslem, Hindu, whatever. In fact consider speaking with God even if
you're not sure He exists - you could be wrong!

I do know one thing. Whether or not you believe in Jesus Christ, God will listen to you if you
speak directly to him. The notion put forth here br Dr. Chung that somehow we aren't good enough
to speak directly to God and must do so though Jesus and ONLY through Jesus is without a doubt
the most ludicrous thing I have ever read on the Internet - and there are a LOT of ludicrous
things on the Internet.

Ah, Steven, I don't believe that Dr. Chung has said any such thing, i.e., that one can speak to
God only through Jesus Christ. I suspect that most Christians would subscribe to the notion that
anyone can petition God directly in prayer. Most Christians would also subscribe to the notion
that invoking the name of Jesus in the prayer makes the prayer "more powerful". Many Christians
end their prayers by saying something like, "I ask these thing in the name of Jesus, Amen." Surely
you've heard this before.

You may be confusing the above with the Christian belief that *salvation* is only through Jesus
Christ. Jesus Himself said so numerous times in the Gospels. Obviously, people who subscribe to
other religions such as Judaism or Islam do not accept this. Nevertheless, that does not make what
Dr. Chung has said about salvation to be ludicrous, unless you take all of Christianity to be
ludicrous.

I suspect the latter.

Quoted message said:

Happy New Year, John

You too, John :-)

Humbly,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Cardiologist
http:/www.heartmdphd.com/

John9212112 said:

Quoted message said:

From: Matti Narkia [email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:24:53 -0500 in article <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Fanatical religious belief has created more sorrow and pain in this world than anything else.

Exactly, and that proves Dr. Nagler's point.

--
Matti Narkia

Hmmmm......interesting assertion. Perhaps someone could supply some data comparing deaths due to
fanatical religious belief with deaths due to fanatical Godless political belief. For the latter,
you could restrict yourselves to just the 20th century. Lot's of deaths due to fanatical Godless
political belief during that period. Sorry to invoke Godwin's here (I'm not calling anyone here a
Nazi) but [censored], Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Tojo, Kim Il Sung, and on and on. All for political ideals
or just plain greed.

I see nothing in Christianity promoting religious war, quite the contrary.

Yes, you are correct.

Quoted message said:

Sure, there have been plenty of wars in the NAME of Christianity but I believe that these were
really for the same purposes as above - politics and greed.

Politics and greed are of this world. As christians, we are no longer of this world.

Quoted message said:

Happy New Year, John

You too, brother :-)

Humbly,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Cardiologist
http:/www.heartmdphd.com/