Thank you, Rich.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Thank you, Rich.
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 7/31/2003 3:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Thank you, Rich. The kids at the Children's Hospital at Westmead will
be getting their share shortly.

I expect that Jan will refuse to admit that she was wrong

Wrong about what? Saying, I doubt that Rich actually would send any money??

You don't really think, the fact that you say he did is any proof at all, do
you?

Furthermore you have some nerve in talking about admitting when one is wrong.

You STILL have posted NO proof of your claim that I demonised any doctors in
the Ben Kolb case.

Quoted message said:

Dear Gebesse Holdings Pty Ltd,

Quoted message said:

This email confirms that you have received a Payment
for $75.00 from Richard Shewmaker (rich@[censored])

Quoted message said:

View the details of this transaction online at:

Quoted message said:

paypal.comid=ohnoyoudon'tevenifpaypalsecurityisbulletproofOpen ↗

I did.

And received this:

The transaction ID in your link is invalid.

<snip>

Quoted message said:

This is the donation that Jan Drew decided to facilitate.

WOW!!!

Would you post the proof of this statement?!?!

KA Ching,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,another LIE.

Quoted message said:

It will be

Quoted message said:

interesting to see if her behavior continues into next month.

MY behavior???

I has already been interesting and disgusting that you are STILL LYING and have
NOT posted any proof of WHERE I demonised any doctors!!

Since it appears you can't and everyone knows it is a LIE, I suggest you change
your website.

This game of ye ole boy and girl club of you lie and I'll swear to it, you are
playing can readily stop if you just come clean and admit you lied.

Rich has *overlooked* every lie, he just llikes to say KA Ching.

I have and will contine to call EVERY SINGLE LIE posted here, just as I did
today where Peter Moran LIED when he stated, supplement manufactures *encourge*
people to have sloppy eating habits.

You people really should learn NOT to make things up.

Jan

--

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

$1 to Quackwatch for August, I believe.

Afraid not, alas. August came earlier to Australia than to the rest of the
world.

--Rich

Rich Shewmaker said:

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

$1 to Quackwatch for August, I believe.

Afraid not, alas. August came earlier to Australia than to the rest of the
world.

Bugger! Jan will be accusing me of lying now for saying it was August
when it was still July somewhere. But in my favour, I suppose, I could
claim that when I wrote that I had had ACTUAL EXPERIENCE of August
2003.

--
Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
I'm a Bright. Are you?

In said:

I have and will contine to call EVERY SINGLE LIE posted here

Wow! That's a whopper even for Jan.
Self-disproving, too: she told a blatant lie,
and didn't "call it." Which, of course, bumps
up its "lie count" by one, if such a thing mattered.

--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
end

In said:

Bugger! Jan will be accusing me of lying now for saying it was August
when it was still July somewhere. But in my favour, I suppose, I could
claim that when I wrote that I had had ACTUAL EXPERIENCE of August
2003.

Ah, but yours doesn't count.

--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
end

--

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

You made it up!! You LIED!!!

$ KaChing $3

Quoted message said:

From: Rich Shewmaker ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Jan the Accuser
View: Complete Thread (48 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2003-07-02 01:51:16 PST

I just had a great idea! As of July 1, I will donate $1 to quackwatch.com
every time Jan calls someone a LIAR, and donate $5 every time she says
something negative about Dr. Barrett or his websites,

LOL. This seems to be a control problem as the debunkers think Dr Barrett

is an

Quoted message said:

EXPERT. However it appears he is losing his sue happy suits all over, as

he is

Quoted message said:

NOT qualified to judge. Neither is he qualified to write his websites and

judge

Quoted message said:

alternative, As Anth point out, he had no references to bACK UP HIS

CLAIMS.

Quoted message said:

up to a maximum of
$100 per month, until further notice. The principle of free speech and the
nature of the internet make it impossible to prevent her invective, but I
can at least make it sting a little bit every time she misbehaves.

YEAH, it is misbehaving to point out lies here. Sorta of like Jesus

misbehaved

Quoted message said:

when he turned over the money changers tables in the temple.

If anyone
would like to join me, I will post the totals of the transgressions and

the

Quoted message said:

appropriate amount at the end of each month until further notice. It is

easy

Quoted message said:

to donate. The more who join in, the more negative reinforcement is

applied.

Quoted message said:

See:

This is all done in an effort to LEAVE the lies alone.

You have repeatedly demonstrated deficits in reading comprehension. You are
thereby UNQUALIFIED to be the referree of truth and lies on this newsgroup.

Quoted message said:

And in fact is led by Satan.

Yep, I get my instructions from Lucifer twice a week when we go out for a
beer after work (he's also the EOM liason at my hospital.)

Quoted message said:

So if Rich wants to support LIES, he and he alone will answer for HIS

behavior.

Threatening me with divine retribution now? LOL! Even if your god existed,
would he really take an interest in the veracity of posters to this
insignificant little newsgroup?

--Rich

Jan

"D. C. Sessions" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In said:

I have and will contine to call EVERY SINGLE LIE posted here

Wow! That's a whopper even for Jan.
Self-disproving, too: she told a blatant lie,
and didn't "call it." Which, of course, bumps
up its "lie count" by one, if such a thing mattered.

This presents us with quite a poser -- is Jan lying if she convinces herself
that she's not? Is she lying if she can't see the lie due to her
intellectual presbyopia?

In said:

"D. C. Sessions" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In said:

I have and will contine to call EVERY SINGLE LIE posted here

Wow! That's a whopper even for Jan.
Self-disproving, too: she told a blatant lie,
and didn't "call it." Which, of course, bumps
up its "lie count" by one, if such a thing mattered.

This presents us with quite a poser -- is Jan lying if she convinces herself
that she's not? Is she lying if she can't see the lie due to her
intellectual presbyopia?

"This statement cannot be proven."

--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
end

Quoted message said:

In said:

"D. C. Sessions" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In <[email hidden]>, Jan wrote:

> I have and will contine to call EVERY SINGLE LIE posted here

Wow! That's a whopper even for Jan.
Self-disproving, too: she told a blatant lie,
and didn't "call it." Which, of course, bumps
up its "lie count" by one, if such a thing mattered.

This presents us with quite a poser -- is Jan lying if she convinces

herself

Quoted message said:

that she's not? Is she lying if she can't see the lie due to her
intellectual presbyopia?

"This statement cannot be proven."

Would the answer really matter, inasfar as Jan Drew is concerned?

How about discussing "Alternative Therapies" while you are partially here?

"Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Would the answer really matter, inasfar as Jan Drew is concerned?

Quoted message said:

How about discussing "Alternative Therapies" while you are partially here?

"Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Would the answer really matter, inasfar as Jan Drew is concerned?

Since you want to discuss the taste of Peter B's penis, you should be having a
discussion with your parents.

Log off, Gymmie.