General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Teflon and Cooking

Started by WaverlyHayden · · Last activity · 7 posts · 293 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
22 July 2005
Last activity
23 July 2005
Original author
WaverlyHayden
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
293
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Check out this article:

    Teflon accusation doesn't stick
    Michael Fumento
    July 21, 2005
    Teflon has long been a godsend in the kitchen. It's easier to cook
    with, since foods don't stick. It's easier to wash - and easier
    on the environment - since it requires less detergent and no
    dishwasher energy. And it's easier on the heart and the waistline,
    since it eliminates the need for cooking in lots of oil, butter or
    margarine.
    Yet Teflon has recently gone from the frying pan into the fire, thanks
    to some money-hungry lawyers. They've cooked up a scary story, adding
    a dollop of hyperbole for good measure. Unfortunately, they left out
    common sense and science.
    Two law firms filed a class action lawsuit Tuesday (July 19) on behalf
    of consumers regarding a chemical used to make Teflon called
    perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The lawyers claim PFOA may be hazardous
    and want DuPont, Inc, the maker of Teflon, to pay $5 billion. If the
    suit pans out, whatever is left after attorneys' fees would go to
    replace everyone's cookware, impose a warning label on other Teflon
    products, and pay for medical monitoring and more research.
    "I don't have to prove that it causes cancer," one of the slick
    attorneys told the Associated Press. "I only have to prove that
    DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product."
    But the greasy lawyers' charges against Teflon just don't stick...

    To read the rest go to:
    http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/Fumento20050721.shtml

  2. "WaverlyHayden" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Unfortunately, they left out
    common sense and science.

    Why should that matter? Most law suits of this type get to a jury with even
    less common sense but want to punish the big business.

    Where do I get my new pan?

  3. Edwin Pawlowski said:

    "WaverlyHayden" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Unfortunately, they left out
    common sense and science.

    Why should that matter? Most law suits of this type get to a jury with even
    less common sense but want to punish the big business.

    The goal is to enrich the lawyers. A side issue might be to get trivial
    compensation for the litigants. Thats why most of them would give their
    right arm to discover something new they they can feed on...

    Quoted message said:


    Where do I get my new pan?

  4. "George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:


    The goal is to enrich the lawyers. A side issue might be to get trivial
    compensation for the litigants. Thats why most of them would give their
    right arm to discover something new they they can feed on...

    A law firm here in CT advertises they can help you if you are in an
    accident. They say "we can't promise you a big settlement, but we'll try to
    help you" In the background an armored car pull into the driveway of a
    house, opens the doors and starts tossing out bags of money. The scum
    lawyer should be put into one of those sacks for a week.

  5. Edwin Pawlowski at [email hidden] wrote on 7/22/05 10:35 PM:

    Quoted message said:

    "George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:


    The goal is to enrich the lawyers. A side issue might be to get trivial
    compensation for the litigants. Thats why most of them would give their
    right arm to discover something new they they can feed on...

    A law firm here in CT advertises they can help you if you are in an
    accident. They say "we can't promise you a big settlement, but we'll try to
    help you" In the background an armored car pull into the driveway of a
    house, opens the doors and starts tossing out bags of money. The scum
    lawyer should be put into one of those sacks for a week.

    I know exactly who you mean! Initials JH, right?
    I used to work for a company that ran an advertising "group" program for
    personal injury lawyers. Talk about sleaze! He was one of our biggest
    competitors in the CT market.

    My former company's ads were much more tasteful......(eyeroll)
    The owner of our company, sitting in front of a fake bookcase, saying "If
    you've been hurt in any kind of accident, you may be entitled to money.
    Money for your injuries and money for your PAIN and SUFFERING! Call ..xxxxx.
    You'll speak to a lawyer near you for FREE! We can help you get MONEY. Call
    NOW!" (and of course, he said the phone number 3-4 times).

    Designed with simple language to appeal to simple people....and did I
    mention lazy and greedy???

    Truthfully, these cases are getting harder and harder to win (from the
    injured party's perspective), because many states are legislating caps on
    this type of lawsuit. Plus, insurance companies are quicker to settle b/c
    it's cheaper than going to court. Many lawyers already will not even look at
    medical malpractice cases, because they have gotten nearly impossible to
    make any money on.

  6. WaverlyHayden said:

    Check out this article:

    Teflon accusation doesn't stick
    Michael Fumento
    July 21, 2005
    Teflon has long been a godsend in the kitchen. It's easier to cook
    with, since foods don't stick. It's easier to wash - and easier
    on the environment - since it requires less detergent and no
    dishwasher energy. And it's easier on the heart and the waistline,
    since it eliminates the need for cooking in lots of oil, butter or
    margarine.
    Yet Teflon has recently gone from the frying pan into the fire, thanks
    to some money-hungry lawyers. They've cooked up a scary story, adding
    a dollop of hyperbole for good measure. Unfortunately, they left out
    common sense and science.
    Two law firms filed a class action lawsuit Tuesday (July 19) on behalf
    of consumers regarding a chemical used to make Teflon called
    perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The lawyers claim PFOA may be hazardous
    and want DuPont, Inc, the maker of Teflon, to pay $5 billion. If the
    suit pans out, whatever is left after attorneys' fees would go to
    replace everyone's cookware, impose a warning label on other Teflon
    products, and pay for medical monitoring and more research.
    "I don't have to prove that it causes cancer," one of the slick
    attorneys told the Associated Press. "I only have to prove that
    DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product."
    But the greasy lawyers' charges against Teflon just don't stick...

    To read the rest go to:
    http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/Fumento20050721.shtml

    how can the [censored] trial lawyers convince a jury to award damages
    after people clearly misuse the product? For God sakes...water is
    vital for our existance but if you boil it and start consuming it you
    will burn your face!

    What is so sad about our system of justice is that these [censored] trial
    lawyers only have to extract one dim witted idiot from the jury pool
    who would leave a teflon pot on the stove all day long burning it's
    coating off...and DuPont is screwed!

    Bill

  7. Sheryl Rosen said:

    Designed with simple language to appeal to simple people....and did I
    mention lazy and greedy???

    Truthfully, these cases are getting harder and harder to win (from the
    injured party's perspective), because many states are legislating caps on
    this type of lawsuit.

    Hasn't happened in my state yet. Our governor is a Philly lawyer who is
    very careful not to step on his associates.

    Plus, insurance companies are quicker to settle b/c

    Quoted message said:

    it's cheaper than going to court. Many lawyers already will not even look at
    medical malpractice cases, because they have gotten nearly impossible to
    make any money on.

    The largest one (his picture is on every other billboard along the road)
    in my area won't touch a case that is less than $1,000,000. Doctors have
    been fleeing my state in droves and now it takes a month or more to see
    one of the specialists that remain.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.