UK and Europe · Public discussion

Technical query, RSX/Sora rear mech

Started by Martinm · · Last activity · 10 posts · 922 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 January 2004
Last activity
24 January 2004
Original author
Martinm
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
922
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My old RSX rear mech has finally given up the ghost. I have ordered a short reach Sora as a
    replacement but it says in the blurb, max chainring 27T. Is this due to clearance or just an
    arbitrary figure to do with chain length? My current set up with the RSX is 47/39 on the front and
    13-28 on the back. The 28 was a cop out to avoid the hassle of going to a triple.

  2. "MartinM" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My old RSX rear mech has finally given up the ghost. I have ordered a short reach Sora as a
    replacement but it says in the blurb, max chainring 27T. Is this due to clearance or just an
    arbitrary figure to do with chain length? My current set up with the RSX is 47/39 on the front and
    13-28 on the back. The 28 was a cop out to avoid the hassle of going to a triple.

    As I remember it Sora has a slightly bigger diameter jockey wheel than RSX.

    So I tink you be stuffed, it certainly buggered my 28. Don't forget chain length isn't really
    relevant because you will be on the small front chain wheel.

    Although you can take the jockey off the RSX and put it on the sora.

    Mind you I did have long reach rear mechs.

  3. MartinM said:

    My old RSX rear mech has finally given up the ghost. I have ordered a short reach Sora as a
    replacement but it says in the blurb, max chainring 27T. Is this due to clearance or just an
    arbitrary figure to do with chain length? My current set up with the RSX is 47/39 on the front and
    13-28 on the back. The 28 was a cop out to avoid the hassle of going to a triple.

    It's to do with clearance to the sprocket but chain length does affect this as it can pull mech away
    from the sprocket. Shimano's (and Campag's) figures are conservative - you can often push them a
    bit. It helps to keep chain as short as possible for the big-big (47x28) and screw in the b-tension
    screw. The screw can even be replaced for a longer one as a last-resort bodge.

    Dozens/hundred's of users on rec.bicycles.tech say they've used their "27T" mechs with larger
    sprockets with no problems. (I've personally exceeded the specs with Campag mechs but not
    Shimano's).

    ~PB

  4. MartinM said:

    My old RSX rear mech has finally given up the ghost. I have ordered a short reach Sora as a
    replacement but it says in the blurb, max chainring 27T. Is this due to clearance or just an
    arbitrary figure to do with chain length? My current set up with the RSX is 47/39 on the front and
    13-28 on the back. The 28 was a cop out to avoid the hassle of going to a triple.

    I have not exceeded the range on rear mechs, I have on front with no problems, by 1 tooth is worth a
    try but I wouldn't try to shift to a 30 or
    32.

    You could always fit a mountain bike rear mech that will shift to 32 and 34 toothed sprockets.

    --
    The Reply & From email addresses are checked rarely. mseries.freeserve.co.ukmseries.freeserve.co.uk

  5. I said:

    Dozens/hundred's

    That's one for Lynne Truss.

    ~PB

  6. "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    MartinM said:

    My old RSX rear mech has finally given up the ghost. I have ordered a short reach Sora as a
    replacement but it says in the blurb, max chainring 27T. Is this due to clearance or just an
    arbitrary figure to do with chain length? My current set up with the RSX is 47/39 on the front
    and 13-28 on the back. The 28 was a cop out to avoid the hassle of going to a triple.

    I have not exceeded the range on rear mechs, I have on front with no problems, by 1 tooth is worth
    a try but I wouldn't try to shift to a 30 or
    32.

    You could always fit a mountain bike rear mech that will shift to 32 and 34 toothed sprockets.

    Thanks for all the advice. Yes the big jockey wheel was what got me thinking. The jockey wheels are
    completely shagged on my RSX, one reason I'm replacing it.Actually my set up is not quite a 13-28, I
    was given a 28 rear cog and took apart my 13-23 HG50 cassette to give me an granny gear for those
    big hills (works fine on the way down but changing from 28 to 21 is quite a shock). This is the
    problem when they have stopped making 7 speed cassettes, relying on old stock. A _real_ MTB rear
    cassette is hopeless, far too big difference between gears for road use. Perhaps I should just put
    the 23 back and stop being such a wimp ;-)

  7. "MartinM" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for all the advice. Yes the big jockey wheel was what got me thinking. The jockey wheels
    are completely shagged on my RSX, one reason I'm replacing it.Actually my set up is not quite a
    13-28, I was given a 28 rear cog and took apart my 13-23 HG50 cassette to give me an granny gear
    for those big hills (works fine on the way down but changing from 28 to 21 is quite a shock). This
    is the problem when they have stopped making 7 speed cassettes, relying on old stock. A _real_ MTB
    rear cassette is hopeless, far too big difference between gears for road use. Perhaps I should
    just put the 23 back and stop being such a wimp ;-)

    You could buy a repalcement small diameter jockey wheel for the RSX or Sora. Or you could buy an mtb
    mech. There will be no need to use an mtb cassette simply because you've got an mtb mech. The
    difference with an mtb mech is not only the longer cage which takes up slack chain, of which there
    is more with wider range gears, but also the body is longer to keep the top jockey from clouting the
    bigger sprockets.
    --
    Pete /Playtime.html"]http:[email hidden]/Playtime.html

  8. "Peter B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "MartinM" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for all the advice. Yes the big jockey wheel was what got me thinking. The jockey wheels
    are completely shagged on my RSX, one reason I'm replacing it.Actually my set up is not quite a
    13-28, I was given a 28 rear cog and took apart my 13-23 HG50 cassette to give me an granny gear
    for those big hills (works fine on the way down but changing from 28 to 21 is quite a shock).
    This is the problem when they have stopped making 7 speed cassettes, relying on old stock. A
    _real_ MTB rear cassette is hopeless, far too big difference between gears for road use. Perhaps
    I should just put the 23 back and stop being such a wimp ;-)

    You could buy a repalcement small diameter jockey wheel for the RSX or Sora. Or you could buy an
    mtb mech. There will be no need to use an mtb cassette simply because you've got an mtb mech. The
    difference with an mtb mech is not only the longer cage which takes up slack chain, of which there
    is more with wider range gears, but also the body is longer to keep the top jockey from clouting
    the bigger sprockets.

    Thanks, but I'm a bit wary about changing the set up too much. A triple is probably the way to go. I
    could get a 26 to replace the 23.

  9. "MartinM" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks, but I'm a bit wary about changing the set up too much. A triple is probably the way to go.
    I could get a 26 to replace the 23.

    A 26 Should be Ok. There are only a few hills that really require more.

    Mind you I will definitely get a triple on my next road bike.

  10. "Frank X" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "MartinM" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks, but I'm a bit wary about changing the set up too much. A triple is probably the way to
    go. I could get a 26 to replace the 23.

    A 26 Should be Ok. There are only a few hills that really require more.

    Symonds Yat?. in the middle of a 400 ;-(

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.