On 10 Dec 2005 23:53:53 -0800, "Marian" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I'm perfectly willing to be known as cantankerous and grumpy because, sometimes I am. I just like to have done something hostile before I get marked as such. 🙂
Yes, i can see why that would be better.
Quoted message said:
Apology accepted.
Thanks.
Quoted message said:
(from your other post, what is a JB?)
That would be either a Jobst Brandt or a Jim Beam. They're the resident rbt tagteam who disagree violently with each other about pretty much literally *everything*.
Let's be fair. Brandt is always right, and Beam is always wrong.
On 10 Dec 2005 23:53:53 -0800, "Marian" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I'm perfectly willing to be known as cantankerous and grumpy because, sometimes I am. I just like to have done something hostile before I get marked as such. 🙂
Yes, i can see why that would be better.
Quoted message said:
Apology accepted.
Thanks.
Quoted message said:
(from your other post, what is a JB?)
That would be either a Jobst Brandt or a Jim Beam. They're the resident rbt tagteam who disagree violently with each other about pretty much literally *everything*.
Let's be fair. Brandt is always right, and Beam is always wrong.
brandt always right? really? so when brandt claims a non strain-aging material can be deformed without work hardening, [even though it can't] that's right? how about when he uses that same misconception to formulate a theory of "stress relief" and fatigue elimination from a material with no endurance limit? and headsets that don't brinell? [etc. etc.] how about people that write scare stories about disk brakes where they're deliberately omitting relevant facts to create sensation? that's right too?
throwing your suckie out of the stroller won't make its wheels stronger michael. but i guess that's not your objective, is it.
That would be either a Jobst Brandt or a Jim Beam. They're the resident rbt tagteam who disagree violently with each other about pretty much literally *everything*.
Let's be fair. Brandt is always right, and Beam is always wrong.
brandt always right? really? so when brandt claims a non strain-aging
[...]
The words 'hook, line, and sinker' suddenly spring to mind, for no obvious reason.