Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Tech question on MTB derailleur

Started by amirm · · Last activity · 8 posts · 467 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
6 April 2004
Last activity
7 April 2004
Original author
amirm
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
467
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all:

    I need some education on front derailleurs. In particular, I want to
    know about the swing mechanism. What's the difference between top and
    bottom swing? What difference does it make? How can I work out mine is
    top or bottom swing?

    I have a Deore derailleur, and as part of upgrading the drivetrain, I
    want to put a new XT. The seller asks me to specify the swing type.
    Obviously, I'm not buying the part at my LBS. Can someone help?

    Cheers, Amir.

    --

  2. amirm said:

    Hi all:
    I need some education on front derailleurs. In particular, I want to
    know about the swing mechanism. What's the difference between top and
    bottom swing? What difference does it make? How can I work out mine is
    top or bottom swing?
    I have a Deore derailleur, and as part of upgrading the drivetrain, I
    want to put a new XT. The seller asks me to specify the swing type.
    Obviously, I'm not buying the part at my LBS. Can someone help?
    Cheers, Amir.

    Never mind, I worked it out. Mine is a top swing.

    Cheers.

    --

  3. amirm said:

    Never mind, I worked it out. Mine is a top swing.
    Cheers.

    shouldnt it be 'top-pull' or bottom-pull' ???

    ie which orientation the cable pulls on the mech from

    From my (albeit totally un-researched and off the cuff) memory it would
    seem that the majority of mtb front mechs are top-pull to keep the cable
    protected from mud/road-grime if it were going round under the BB

    anyone wanna clarify that?

    --

  4. Nope. Bottom-pull derailleurs can be either top swing or bottom swing.
    eg the Deore XT FD-M750 and FD-M751.

    Nick

    flyingdutch said:
    amirm said:

    Never mind, I worked it out. Mine is a top swing.
    Cheers.

    shouldnt it be 'top-pull' or bottom-pull' ???

  5. flyingdutch said:

    shouldnt it be 'top-pull' or bottom-pull' ???
    ie which orientation the cable pulls on the mech from
    From my (albeit totally un-researched and off the cuff) memory it would
    seem that the majority of mtb front mechs are top-pull to keep the cable
    protected from mud/road-grime if it were going round under the BB
    anyone wanna clarify that?

    You're right about the routing. However, some manufacturers still prefer
    routing through the down tube and under BB (including mine). Shimano has
    recently moved to make dual pull structure which one mech can be used in
    either way.

    However, top and bottom swing refers to the position of the swing arm
    in refernce to the clamp. Due to space restriction, eg in duallies and
    some compact frames, top swing mech has become popular as the clamp
    can sit really close to BB. Shimano manufacture two versions of each
    front derailleurs which are both dual pull and multi-clamp. That is,
    they can fit any of the three mainstream seat tube sizes and they can
    use either routing direction. The difference is only in the swing
    geometry. A traditional hard-tail should be able to use either
    version. In my case, I am going with the M760 derailleur which is top
    swing. M761 is bottom swing.

    It seems swing geometry has not been an issue on roadies, and they all
    seem to use the bottom-pull bottom-swing set up.

    Hope this clarifies a little.

    Cheers, Amir.

    --

  6. "amirm" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    However, top and bottom swing refers to the position of the swing arm
    in refernce to the clamp. Due to space restriction, eg in duallies and
    some compact frames, top swing mech has become popular as the clamp
    can sit really close to BB.

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    The difference is only in the swing geometry.

    There's more to it than that, as some derailleurs are BB mounted with no
    clamp, bottom swing and cable routing under the BB. These are used for
    dualies with an interupted/minimal seat tube where a clamp-mount cannot be
    used.

    Cheers
    Peter

  7. Peter Signorini said:

    "amirm" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:OgJcc.12-
    [email hidden]:[email hidden]-
    etserver.com...

    Quoted message said:

    However, top and bottom swing refers to the position of the swing arm
    in refernce to the clamp. Due to space restriction, eg in duallies and
    some compact frames, top swing mech has become popular as the clamp
    can sit really close to BB.


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    The difference is only in the swing geometry.


    There's more to it than that, as some derailleurs are BB mounted with
    no clamp, bottom swing and cable routing under the BB. These are used
    for dualies with an interupted/minimal seat tube where a clamp-mount
    cannot be used.
    Cheers Peter

    Peter:

    It's interesting you said that. Someone also said that in general bottom
    swing shifts better than top swing. So when this third group of BB-
    mounted derailleurs came around, they went for bottom swing and not top
    swing. This is consistent with road bikes using bottom swing. So one can
    conclude that top swing is a solution to address restricted requirements
    of specific set-ups, eg duallies, and it's not necessarily as good.

    Cheers, Amir.

    --

  8. Boy, that Singlespeed is lookin' good 😄 😄 😄

    --

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.