Team DFL

dumbass,

your joke would've been better if you'd waited until you had results to
post where a DFL rider really was DFL.

amit said:

dumbass,

your joke would've been better if you'd waited until you had results to
post where a DFL rider really was DFL.

1. You're saying someone who posts to rbr should've exhibited patience and
self-restraint?

2. How long do you think Cyclingnews will qualify each reference to Team
DFL as they do here?
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/dec04/dec14news

"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

dumbass,

your joke would've been better if you'd waited until you had results to
post where a DFL rider really was DFL.

1. You're saying someone who posts to rbr should've exhibited patience and
self-restraint?

2. How long do you think Cyclingnews will qualify each reference to Team
DFL as they do here?
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/dec04/dec14news

At least it wasn't on the bottom of the page.

In article <mSBvd.26014$233.6411@okepread05>, Carl Sundquist

Quoted message said:

"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

dumbass,

your joke would've been better if you'd waited until you had results to
post where a DFL rider really was DFL.

1. You're saying someone who posts to rbr should've exhibited patience and
self-restraint?

2. How long do you think Cyclingnews will qualify each reference to Team
DFL as they do here?
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/dec04/dec14news

At least it wasn't on the bottom of the page.

There has been a Team DFL in Northern California for a number of years
now. One day several years ago I was at the office of our District Rep
when she got a phone call from a confused rider. The rider was a member
of Team DFL but his USCF license had come back as unattached. The rider
didn't understand why he was listed as Unattached. As the rider said "
I listed Team DFL as my team on my license application. I even included
the full team name by spelling out what DFL stands for". Needless to
say the DR and I both found that to be pretty funny.

Casey Kerrigan said:

In article <mSBvd.26014$233.6411@okepread05>, Carl Sundquist

Quoted message said:

"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

> dumbass,
>
> your joke would've been better if you'd waited until you had results to
> post where a DFL rider really was DFL.

1. You're saying someone who posts to rbr should've exhibited patience and
self-restraint?

2. How long do you think Cyclingnews will qualify each reference to Team
DFL as they do here?
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2004/dec04/dec14news

At least it wasn't on the bottom of the page.

There has been a Team DFL in Northern California for a number of years
now. One day several years ago I was at the office of our District Rep
when she got a phone call from a confused rider. The rider was a member
of Team DFL but his USCF license had come back as unattached. The rider
didn't understand why he was listed as Unattached. As the rider said "
I listed Team DFL as my team on my license application. I even included
the full team name by spelling out what DFL stands for". Needless to
say the DR and I both found that to be pretty funny.

Here in blighty we're (I'm) not gettting the irony of the DFL
acrynom...

Regards!
Stephen

Steve McGinty said:

Here in blighty we're (I'm) not gettting the irony of the DFL
acrynom...

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/9e64556e1fc75af5?dmode=source

--
Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

Ewoud Dronkert said:

Steve McGinty said:

Here in blighty we're (I'm) not gettting the irony of the DFL
acrynom...

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/9e64556e1fc75af5?dmode=source

I'll let them know...

Regards!
Stephen