From: "TBF" <[email hidden]>
Newsgroups: alt.mountain-bike
Subject: JD's Trek Posts
Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:18:44 GMT
From the Google archives:
"Kathleen, when we rode at Bartlett, I was wishing I had my Y bike
that had
been in warranty replacement since mid-December and I did state that."
And this gem:
"Even though mine broke (and has since been
replaced under warranty), I still think that the Y ride is a
damn good one for the money and I intend to ride it until it
breaks again."
Even better, a poster wrote he was going from a Trek 820 to a Trek URT
Y-Bike and JD replied:
"You'll love the difference Mikel. Going from my lead sled Trek 850 to
my
Y11, I surely did."
In response to an ad for a URT Y-11 on EBay:
"Yeah?, so what's the spec?
JD interested in a Y11"
Since when is admitting a bike broke or is in warranty replacement
defined as a "glowing recommendation"? I'm not sure how stupid you
are, but when I read someone keeps breaking a certain bike, I'd
definitly not go out and buy one. Then again, you are obviously not
capable of rational thought.
By the way, where are the message headers so we can all tell what date
those were posted? I'd wager they were posted long before you ever
showed your mug in am-b. Technology has lept forward leaps and bounds
since 1999 and the FS offerings are much better than they were back
then. Anyone who isn't a neophyte yuppy acting stylish on a "mountain
bike" such as yourself would know that.
Now go break your crappy jamis again. You will.
JD