Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

tapered bottom bracket

Started by cliff · · Last activity · 2 posts · 773 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 November 2003
Last activity
18 November 2003
Original author
cliff
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
773
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have an old 110 mm bolt circle Ritchey Crankset that has been mounted on a Campy record spindle (116 mm?) I know that the Ritchey crank is meant for a jis taper and the campy is an ISO taper. The crank does not bottom out on the spindle-it actually seems like an OK fit. My questions are 1) does anyone know what the recommended spindle length for this crank is?, and 2) what is the exact difference between a jis taper and an ISO taper? TIA

  2. cliff said:

    I have an old 110 mm bolt circle Ritchey Crankset that has been mounted on a Campy record spindle
    (116 mm?) I know that the Ritchey crank is meant for a jis taper and the campy is an ISO taper.
    The crank does not bottom out on the spindle-it actually seems like an OK fit. My questions are 1)
    does anyone know what the recommended spindle length for this crank is?, and 2) what is the exact
    difference between a jis taper and an ISO taper? TIA

    Sugino ( and their Ritchey label cranks) have been through more than a few design iterations so no,
    just being a "ritchey" crank isn't descriptive enough.

    The two spindles are different sections of the same taper, starting at 12.5mm for all the many
    brands of classic spindles (Including Shimano) until the recent Shimano-promulgated 13mm start which
    has made this so frustrating.

    There was at one time a different taper angle ( 2 deg. for cast aluminum cranks) but that is so rare
    now and so visibly different as to cause no trouble.

    Regarding spindle length, which has become shorter generally over time, here's a good comparison:
    yellowjersey.orgCRSPNDLS.JPG

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.