Road Cycling · Public discussion

Taking bets on Landis v. USADA

Started by DirtRoadie · · Last activity · 7 posts · 515 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
24 May 2007
Last activity
25 May 2007
Original author
DirtRoadie
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
515
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. SandM said:

    What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?

    I think that the panel will go 2-1

    I agree on the 2-1. Campbell rulles for Landis. I haven't yet decided
    whether one of the others will join him.

    DR

  2. What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?

    I think that the panel will go 2-1

  3. SandM said:

    What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?

    I think that the panel will go 2-1

    Candyass! Which way?

    Guilty, 2-1.

    Bob Schwartz

  4. SandM said:

    "Bob Schwartz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    SandM wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think that the panel will go 2-1

    Quoted message said:

    Candyass! Which way?

    Quoted message said:

    Guilty, 2-1.

    In favor of Floyd. They did not prove that he doped and he showed that the
    test results were shaky at best. Landis loses in the court of public
    opinion. He makes poor decisions and has a buffoon of a manager, oops, had.

    2-1 guilty, then bumped to Switzerland for the appeal, where, if the
    defense has any common sense, they'll tweak the presentation to
    eliminate the shoot-thyself-in-the-foot debacles. Then it's a new
    game, the Tour is over, there's a new champion, and Floyd can be
    exonerated, pardoned or banned for the remainder and everyone goes
    home a winner.

    R

  5. "Bob Schwartz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    SandM said:

    What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?

    I think that the panel will go 2-1

    Candyass! Which way?

    Guilty, 2-1.

    Bob Schwartz

    In favor of Floyd. They did not prove that he doped and he showed that the
    test results were shaky at best. Landis loses in the court of public
    opinion. He makes poor decisions and has a buffoon of a manager, oops, had.

  6. SandM said:

    What are the chances that Floyd prevails in this round ?

    I think that the panel will go 2-1

    My guess is Landis wins 2-1

    McLaren is USADA's guy so he votes Guilty
    Campbell is Landis' pick, former athlete, known pro-athlete
    arbitrator, votes Not Guilty
    Brunet, the neutral arbitrator, seemed most interested in the
    defense's arguments on bad lab work, asking questions. I think he
    leans Not Guilty.

  7. RicodJour said:

    2-1 guilty, then bumped to Switzerland for the appeal, where, if the
    defense has any common sense, they'll tweak the presentation to
    eliminate the shoot-thyself-in-the-foot debacles.

    So clean and uncorrupted Switzerland will be introduced to the soap opera.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.