Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Sydney cyclist plan

Started by Jack Russell · · Last activity · 5 posts · 381 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
12 August 2006
Last activity
14 August 2006
Original author
Jack Russell
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
381
Views / 30 days
1

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sydney City wants submissions

    http://cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council/OnExhibition/DraftCycleStrategy.asp

    --
    Remove norubbish to reply

  2. "Jack Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Sydney City wants submissions

    http://cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council/OnExhibition/DraftCycleStrategy.asp

    --
    Remove norubbish to reply

    This is all well and good but just when we're got something like this, Iemma
    will probably overule the council once again and take it away ala William
    Street Bikelanes.

    DJ

  3. Jack Russell said:

    Sydney City wants submissions

    http://cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council/OnExhibition/DraftCycleStrategy.asp

    I like the way that they confuse Sydney Council with Sydney,
    but anyway interesting.

    dewatf.

  4. "dewatf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jack Russell said:

    Sydney City wants submissions

    http://cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council/OnExhibition/DraftCycleStrategy.asp

    They have left out The Crescent and Bridge Rd. These are the only direct
    routes from Victoria Rd to the Uni and from Stanmore to the City resp and
    should be cycle routes IMHO, but they say these are in the nice if we could
    but we wont try too hard category. Well they could start by lowering the
    speed limit from 60 on The Crescent (ridiculous), putting in some bike lanes
    where they can (already some, although substandard), use Bike Logos in the
    KSL where you cant, etc. Its jammed with traffic most of the time in peak
    hours so speeds are low and bikes can get past easily - probably much
    quuicker by bike than car. Same goes for Bridge rd, which likewise has some
    bike lanes already, just needs a bit of thinking to make it reasonable for
    your seasoned commuter. Anyway, if making a submission, give them a serve
    over omitting these two roads.

    Also they talk of the foreshore route around Glebe Pt and Blackwattle Bay as
    a recreation route, but it will be a good commuter route too, so they should
    recognise this and design it accordingly.

    fb

  5. In aus.bicycle on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:52:31 GMT

    Fractal said:

    quuicker by bike than car. Same goes for Bridge rd, which likewise has some
    bike lanes already, just needs a bit of thinking to make it reasonable for
    your seasoned commuter. Anyway, if making a submission, give them a serve
    over omitting these two roads.

    I was a bit annoyed that they didn't do those too as their routes add
    unrequired time and distance to my current commute.

    Quoted message said:


    Also they talk of the foreshore route around Glebe Pt and Blackwattle Bay as
    a recreation route, but it will be a good commuter route too, so they should
    recognise this and design it accordingly.

    I think they want to funnel commuters over the Anzac Bridge, leaving
    the scening waterside route for dogwalkers and other real people...

    Zebee

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.