The rightwing media seems euphoric this week as the out-of-the-closet
right-wingers and those still in the closet blame yet another election loss
by the Democratic half of the RepubliCrats on the Dems "lack of religiosity".
The conclusion offered up by the out-of-the-closet rightists crowd
and the pretend lefties alike is to insist that the Dems move toward the
Mullahs of Iran and the 700 Club.
One of the pretend lefties -Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times- wrote
an election wrap in which he claimed that the Democrats support the
working class, and those poor and barely "middle-class" folks who vote for
Republicans are voting against their own interests due to the Democrats
perceived hostility toward religion and "morality".
Kristof says that this perceived hostility toward religion is true, and backs
up his argument about the working class voting against their own interests
not with any empirical evidence that the Democrats are for the working
class (there is none), but with the title of a book from another fake lefty
huckster named Thomas Frank, the author of "What's the Matter With Kansas:
How Conservatives Won the Heart of America".
I recently heard this author Thomas Frank, interviewed on a Pacifica
radio station. This supposedly "leftwing" author, speaking on a supposedly
leftwing radio station, proceeded to mention how he had been a supporter
of Ronald Reagan, and how much he despised labor unions of the 1970's
as "institutions of white racism"!
Yes, Mister Frank proceeded to excoriate the white working class
themselves as hate filled racists who got what they deserved when
the unions were annihilated.
This is the new spokesman of the "left" in America.
Oh, and it is worth mentioning that Mr. Frank -an admitted Reaganite-
who was being interviewed by several people at this "leftwing" Pacifica
station, was never challenged while spewing his vile hatred for the
white working class.
Kristof cites Bill Clinton as some sort of political sage -and Kristof is
not alone in this- yet Clinton never won 50% of the vote. Kerry scored
better than Clinton ever did. The reason Clinton was elected is solely
due to the heavy presence of Ross Perot in both elections. Nader
drew less than one percent of the vote this time, and maybe two percent
in some key states last time. Ross Perot received 19% of the vote
*nationally* in 1992, and the majority of these votes were Bush voters.
Without Ross Perot, Bill Clinton would have been discarded in the
dustbin of history along with such political heavy weights as Walter
Mondale and Michael Dukakis.
Clinton was and is owned by the CIA. The Company flew in hundreds
of tons of cocaine to Mena Arkansas while Bill was governor. Bill's
brother snorted about ten percent of this haul himself.
Clinton -or I should say "the Clintons"- supported NAFTA, which was
the final stake through the heart of the hated white working class.
Nothing else that Clinton did while President was half as important as
NAFTA, and thus his presidency was marked by nothing but sexual
escapades, ludicrous proposals to have flaming [censored] serve openly in
the military, and finally the admission that his penis was as crooked
as he was.
This brings us to the real reason why the Democrats lost this election
which was so winnable:
Susan Sarandon.
The Democratic Party is not identified in the minds of the American
people with any sort of religious hatred or hostility. Clinton was from
the south and attended church services. Jimmy Carter still exists in
the minds of the American people and he does so as a religious
Christian, in fact he does so as an actual believer in Christ and
Christianity, as opposed to the blasphemous Nazi Christ of the 700 Club.
What the Democratic Party has become identified with is the lunatic
actions, statements and ravings of Susan Sarandon and a few high
profile others who are known as "celebrities".
Sarandon seems to devote more time toward winning the freedom
of black murderers like Willie Horton than she does to acting.
Sarandon tries to win the freedom of blacks so abominable that even
Louis Farrakhan won't do anything for them other than to offer a prayer
for their soul.
One of these fiends who Sarandon wants free from death row in
California is there for brutally beating to death an entire white family
in the middle of the night after escaping from police custody. Some
of the police who arrived on the scene had to run outside and vomit
as the family had been hacked up with an axe.
If Dr. Mengele were to show up at an anti-war rally, a pro-abortion
rally etc. he would be denounced and asked to leave. Sarandon is
given center stage and no one of any stature ever denounces her
presence after seeing her tied to their cause in the media later on.
Therefore this lunatic, this woman from a country club Republican
family, has become the identity of the Democratic Party in all those
southern and Western states which Bush won by a landslide.
Sarandon achieved this kind of notoriety precisely due to her
incendiary actions which assured that every exploit which she
perpetrated would become fodder on talk radio programs, not
just Limbaugh but all of the Limbaugh wannabees buzzing
around the hinterlands from dawn to well after dusk.
If you gave a piece of paper to everyone who attended the
Democratic Party convention and asked them to name the fifty
most famous living Democrats there is a very good chance that
Sarandon's name would not appear on any list created. Do the
same at any Bush rally in any of those states where he won by
a landslide (a long list), and there is a very good chance that
Sarandon's name would be on every list and she would finish
number one overall.
Of course, the real reason why this is so important is because
Nicholas Kristof's assertion that the Democrats are for the
"little guy" is a relic of the past, probably the past going all the
way back to Roosevelt in the 1930's. And even then Roosevelt
was simply trying to hold back the authentic leftist movement in
America at that time, a movement so strong that Huey Long had
to be murdered to stop the left from capturing the White House,
and when I say "left" here I'm not referring to those loser Jews
who hate the white working class, I'm talking about someone
and a movement that was led by white people to confiscate the
wealth of the richest people and redistribute it to the poor. A
movement so far to the left that Hugo Chavez looks and sounds
like Rush Limbaugh in comparison.
When you look at it like that then the Democrats have always
seemed like Republicans by another name, and that's the way
the public looks at them too, and the majority of the American
public have decided that if Republicans are all they have to
choose from then they'll choose the Republicans who aren't
trying to get Willie Horton out of prison.
So who will be the nominee next time? Why of course it will
be the unelectable, the hated and despised rightwing [censored]
Hillary Rodham Clinton. Whenever Hillary shows her face
the landslide-states-for-Bush see the face of Susan Sarandon.
Indeed, Hillary has actually socialized with Sarandon. How
fitting that these two rightwing [censored] would be so chatty
with one another.
Hillary and Sarandon would have been at home flirting with Adolf
and advising him to go ahead with the "Night of the Long Knives"
purge.
And from Appalachia to Alabama to Boise Idaho they understand
that implicitly, and that's why they'll be voting for the crook,
Jeb Bush in 2008.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"In a very real and terrifying sense, our Government is the CIA and the
Pentagon, with Congress reduced to a debating society. Of course, you can't
spot this trend to fascism by casually looking around. You can't look for
such familiar signs as the swastika, because they won't be there. We won't
build Dachaus and Auschwitzes; the clever manipulation of the mass media is
creating a concentration camp of the mind that promises to be far more
effective in keeping the populace in line. We're not going to wake up one
morning and suddenly find ourselves in gray uniforms goose-stepping off to
work. But this isn't the test. The test is: What happens to the individual
who dissents? In Nazi Germany, he was physically destroyed; here, the
process is more subtle, but the end results can be the same.
I've learned enough about the machinations of the CIA in the past year to
know that this is no longer the dreamworld America I once believed in. The
imperatives of the population explosion, which almost inevitably will lessen
our belief in the sanctity of the individual human life, combined with the
awesome power of the CIA and the defense establishment, seem destined to
seal the fate of the America I knew as a child and bring us into a new
Orwellian world where the citizen exists for the state and where raw power
justifies any and every immoral act. I've always had a kind of knee-jerk
trust in my Government's basic integrity, whatever political blunders it may
make. But I've come to realize that in Washington, deceiving and
manipulating the public are viewed by some as the natural prerogatives of
office. Huey Long once said, 'Fascism will come to America in the name of
anti-fascism.' I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come
to America in the name of national security."
--Jim Garrison's Interview with Playboy Magazine, October 1967
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.