Road Cycling · Public discussion

Sunglasses w/Rx insert

Started by Fred Hall · · Last activity · 34 posts · 2,198 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 June 2004
Last activity
27 June 2004
Original author
Fred Hall
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,198
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–34 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Fred Hall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    Right now I use my regular glasses that have the magnetic clip-on
    sunglasses, but when I ride, even though they have light plastic lenses they
    are just heavy enough to constantly slip down my nose just enough that I'm
    always either pushing them up with one hand or looking over the top of them.

    My question is, by adding the Rx insert to the wraparound sunglasses, will
    it make them that much heavier and I'll experience the same "slippage"
    problem? Or are they light enough/fit tight enough to stay put? Will I be
    looking over the top of the insert? Anyone with experience using these
    inserts have any insights or alternative recommendations?

    My correction isn't that bad, so I don't have the thick lens weight problem. I
    bought a pair of cycling glasses with inserts a few years ago. While I still
    wear them, I wouldn't buy another pair. The whole insert thing is a nuisance.
    You have 4 surfaces to get dirty/foggy/reflect, they're heavier than regular
    glasses, the inserts make them stand off your face further, etc. I don't find
    they offer any advantage at all, and they reduce the stylishness of cycling
    glasses (if that's what you're after) considerably. Other than style, I don't
    think wraparound glasses have anything to offer anyway.

  2. Peter Cole said:

    I bought a pair of cycling glasses with inserts a few years ago.
    While I still wear them, I wouldn't buy another pair. The whole
    insert thing is a nuisance. You have 4 surfaces to get
    dirty/foggy/reflect, they're heavier than regular glasses, the
    inserts make them stand off your face further, etc. I don't find
    they offer any advantage at all, and they reduce the stylishness
    of cycling glasses (if that's what you're after) considerably.
    Other than style, I don't think wraparound glasses have anything
    to offer anyway.

    I have glasses with inserts, too, and they definitely are a problem
    when it's foggy. Getting four surfaces wet makes it nearly
    impossible to see. I've been thinking of getting the Oakley M Frame
    with integrated prescription lenses. They are pricey, but they
    should solve (well, reduce) the visibility problem in the fog. Tyler
    Hamilton wears a prescription pair:

    http://tinyurl.com/2t9vg

    I do like wrap-around glasses on fast and cool descents, as they
    keep more of the wind out of my eyes. With regular glasses, I tear
    up so much I lose vision and have to slow down.
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://bike.terrymorse.com/

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.
    Right now I use my regular glasses that have the magnetic clip-on
    sunglasses, but when I ride, even though they have light plastic lenses they
    are just heavy enough to constantly slip down my nose just enough that I'm
    always either pushing them up with one hand or looking over the top of them.

    An eyeglass leash would fix this.

    Quoted message said:

    My question is, by adding the Rx insert to the wraparound sunglasses, will
    it make them that much heavier and I'll experience the same "slippage"
    problem?

    Yes, they will be heavier. Most sports glasses have rubber nose pieces
    that keep them from slipping. My Bolle's, older model I forget the name,
    came with arms that wrap around your ear so that they won't slip.

    Quoted message said:

    Or are they light enough/fit tight enough to stay put? Will I be
    looking over the top of the insert? Anyone with experience using these
    inserts have any insights or alternative recommendations?

    The bolle's I have fit close enough to my face that I have to try to look
    above or below the glasses.
    ---------------
    Alex

  4. Fred Hall said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    I just went to my eyeglass-guy, and he showed me a pair of wraparound
    Bolle glasses that can be made to my prescription (and I have progressive
    lenses -- de rigeur for old farts). This seems much better than inserts.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | Deserves death! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve
    _`\(,_ | death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them?
    (_)/ (_) | Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. -- J.
    R. R. Tolkien

  5. Yikes!!! So many choices and contradictory opinions...I want to thank
    everyone who replied. I'm learning a lot about prescription wraparounds
    with and without inserts - that's for sure! I went to my optometrist today
    to feel him out after reading up on mfgr web sites and MTB reviews web site.
    He said he doesn't carry any athletic style glasses with inserts because he
    tried to a few years back and said he only got about a dozen requests a year
    for them (the joys of living in a small city - no volume) and very few were
    ever happy with what they got, so that the back and forth shipping was
    killing him...but he can put the lenses in the inserts I get if I want, and
    he gave me a copy of my prescription if I want to get them made over the
    web.

    So now I'm thinking, maybe go for the cheapie Performance pair with inserts,
    just to see if I like the concept with the thought of getting something more
    expensive later, or go whole hog and get a pair of Rudy Project with inserts
    now (that get really rave user reviews at the MTB site)...and the Oakley M's
    with integrated prescription lens (no inserts) looks pretty compelling too.
    Wish I was rich and could just try 'em all now!

    "Fred Hall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    Right now I use my regular glasses that have the magnetic clip-on
    sunglasses, but when I ride, even though they have light plastic lenses


    they

    Quoted message said:

    are just heavy enough to constantly slip down my nose just enough that I'm
    always either pushing them up with one hand or looking over the top of


    them.

    Quoted message said:


    My question is, by adding the Rx insert to the wraparound sunglasses, will
    it make them that much heavier and I'll experience the same "slippage"
    problem? Or are they light enough/fit tight enough to stay put? Will I


    be

    Quoted message said:

    looking over the top of the insert? Anyone with experience using these
    inserts have any insights or alternative recommendations?

  6. Fred Hall said:

    Yikes!!! So many choices and contradictory opinions...I want to thank
    everyone who replied. I'm learning a lot about prescription wraparounds
    with and without inserts - that's for sure! I went to my optometrist today
    to feel him out after reading up on mfgr web sites and MTB reviews web site.
    He said he doesn't carry any athletic style glasses with inserts because he
    tried to a few years back and said he only got about a dozen requests a year
    for them (the joys of living in a small city - no volume) and very few were
    ever happy with what they got, so that the back and forth shipping was
    killing him...but he can put the lenses in the inserts I get if I want, and
    he gave me a copy of my prescription if I want to get them made over the
    web.

    So now I'm thinking, maybe go for the cheapie Performance pair with inserts,
    just to see if I like the concept with the thought of getting something more
    expensive later, or go whole hog and get a pair of Rudy Project with inserts
    now (that get really rave user reviews at the MTB site)...and the Oakley M's
    with integrated prescription lens (no inserts) looks pretty compelling too.
    Wish I was rich and could just try 'em all now!

    Just a quick overview on this. You should get what you -know- will
    work/satisfy you, b/c there's nothing worse than going for a solution that
    -might- work and being unhappy about it.

    So if I may suggest, save up your money and go for the prescription wraps
    and get the best possible fit, and snug wrap and you know you'll be happy.
    This would be the high end option. (I'd try and check on some kind of
    insurance for them in this case - so you're not worrying about loss or
    breakage.)

    The lower end option would be to try the Performance pair with inserts for
    50 bucks plus the insert lense to see if it will work. You will get dirt
    and fogging, but it might not be so bad that it's unworkable. At least then
    you won't be out so much cash. If it does work, try the Rudys or other high
    ends - be sure and actually check the fit on your face.

    Some ppl suggest getting the cheapest workable pairs of sunglasses b/c
    sooner or later you'll lose them or break them. I got a great deal for $7
    bucks that just happen to fit me like a glove - but I'm able to do this b/c
    I went the route of contacts. This to me is the best option if you have 3-4
    diopter correction. You can have lots of pairs of cheap glasses and don't
    have to worry. For me it's more about how well the wraps fit and seal to my
    face, and less about the rest.

    You're probably going to want blue blocker type lenses for cloudy days,
    regular for sunny days, and clear. The Performance Bike shop type (Radial
    II $60 bucks on sale) will have these - I opted not to get these b/c they
    don't go all the way down to the cheek and I could see space below the
    lense of about 3/8 inch - I like to have my view be uncluttered and not see
    space or frame. Again, check the fit on your face - don't buy and fly.
    (Performance is good b/c they'll take back stuff no questions.)

    Apologies for the additional verbiage... ;-)
    Good luck!

    -Badger

  7. "Badger_South" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Fred Hall said:

    Yikes!!! So many choices and contradictory opinions...I want to thank
    everyone who replied. I'm learning a lot about prescription wraparounds
    with and without inserts - that's for sure! I went to my optometrist


    today

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to feel him out after reading up on mfgr web sites and MTB reviews web


    site.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He said he doesn't carry any athletic style glasses with inserts because


    he

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    tried to a few years back and said he only got about a dozen requests a


    year

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    for them (the joys of living in a small city - no volume) and very few


    were

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ever happy with what they got, so that the back and forth shipping was
    killing him...but he can put the lenses in the inserts I get if I want,


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    he gave me a copy of my prescription if I want to get them made over the
    web.

    So now I'm thinking, maybe go for the cheapie Performance pair with


    inserts,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    just to see if I like the concept with the thought of getting something


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    expensive later, or go whole hog and get a pair of Rudy Project with


    inserts

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    now (that get really rave user reviews at the MTB site)...and the Oakley


    M's

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    with integrated prescription lens (no inserts) looks pretty compelling


    too.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Wish I was rich and could just try 'em all now!

    Just a quick overview on this. You should get what you -know- will
    work/satisfy you, b/c there's nothing worse than going for a solution that
    -might- work and being unhappy about it.

    So if I may suggest, save up your money and go for the prescription wraps
    and get the best possible fit, and snug wrap and you know you'll be happy.
    This would be the high end option. (I'd try and check on some kind of
    insurance for them in this case - so you're not worrying about loss or
    breakage.)

    The lower end option would be to try the Performance pair with inserts for
    50 bucks plus the insert lense to see if it will work. You will get dirt
    and fogging, but it might not be so bad that it's unworkable. At least


    then

    Quoted message said:

    you won't be out so much cash. If it does work, try the Rudys or other


    high

    Quoted message said:

    ends - be sure and actually check the fit on your face.

    Some ppl suggest getting the cheapest workable pairs of sunglasses b/c
    sooner or later you'll lose them or break them. I got a great deal for $7
    bucks that just happen to fit me like a glove - but I'm able to do this


    b/c

    Quoted message said:

    I went the route of contacts. This to me is the best option if you have


    3-4

    Quoted message said:

    diopter correction. You can have lots of pairs of cheap glasses and don't
    have to worry. For me it's more about how well the wraps fit and seal to


    my

    Quoted message said:

    face, and less about the rest.

    You're probably going to want blue blocker type lenses for cloudy days,
    regular for sunny days, and clear. The Performance Bike shop type (Radial
    II $60 bucks on sale) will have these - I opted not to get these b/c they
    don't go all the way down to the cheek and I could see space below the
    lense of about 3/8 inch - I like to have my view be uncluttered and not


    see

    Quoted message said:

    space or frame. Again, check the fit on your face - don't buy and fly.
    (Performance is good b/c they'll take back stuff no questions.)

    Apologies for the additional verbiage... ;-)
    Good luck!

    -Badger

    No apology necessary...I'm new to this so inputs from those more experienced
    is always welcome.

    This bike bug can bite you...the beginning of last season (I'm in upstate
    NY, so the "season" is about late April to mid-October unless you're into
    cold and rain) I was riding a cheapo Walmart hybrid and got hooked on riding
    and knew that heavy thing was no good...last August the LBS was having a
    sale and I picked up a Gary Fisher hybrid at a good price (end of season
    sale) and thought I was in heaven. At the time I was mainly riding bike
    trails that were packed stonedust and fairly flat (along the old Erie
    Canal), but when I took the Fisher on the road I had to pedal like hell to
    get up to 25 mph on a downgrade, so long distance rides took a long
    time...well a month ago I went to the LBS and got a decent deal on a Trek
    1500...now I'm off the tree-lined trails and actually have to worry about
    the sun and wind in my eyes...the Trek really flies (at least to me it seems
    like it)! Thus the search for decent wraparounds.

  8. Fred Hall said:

    No apology necessary...I'm new to this so inputs from those more experienced
    is always welcome.

    This bike bug can bite you...the beginning of last season (I'm in upstate
    NY, so the "season" is about late April to mid-October unless you're into
    cold and rain) I was riding a cheapo Walmart hybrid and got hooked on riding
    and knew that heavy thing was no good...last August the LBS was having a
    sale and I picked up a Gary Fisher hybrid at a good price (end of season
    sale) and thought I was in heaven. At the time I was mainly riding bike
    trails that were packed stonedust and fairly flat (along the old Erie
    Canal), but when I took the Fisher on the road I had to pedal like hell to
    get up to 25 mph on a downgrade, so long distance rides took a long
    time...well a month ago I went to the LBS and got a decent deal on a Trek
    1500...now I'm off the tree-lined trails and actually have to worry about
    the sun and wind in my eyes...the Trek really flies (at least to me it seems
    like it)! Thus the search for decent wraparounds.

    That's almost exactly my story, except I went right from the Wal-goose to
    the Trek. Glad to hear you've graduated to a new set of "problems" <g>.

    Hope that the sun and wind in your eyes are the most problems you have to
    face! Good riding.

    -B

  9. Be careful with prescription inserts. I recently began to ride a motorcycle
    and purchased sunglasses with an insert. I have a thick prescription and
    when Lenscrafters finished them and I placed the insert into the goggle, it
    blurred. When I took the insert out it was fine. I ended up returning them
    and ordering a goggle without an insert from sportrx.com I could see out of
    this one.

    Apparently, there is some distortion when a thick prescription has to be
    bent to fit into a pair of non-prescription sunglasses.

    I ended up just using regular sunglasses with a full face shield helment.

  10. "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Fred Hall said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    I just went to my eyeglass-guy, and he showed me a pair of wraparound
    Bolle glasses that can be made to my prescription (and I have progressive
    lenses -- de rigeur for old farts). This seems much better than inserts.

    Hi, what model and how much?

    Thank you,
    Jeff

  11. Fred Hall said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone with experience using these inserts have any insights or
    alternative recommendations?

    Take a look at Sved Optics (www.svedoptics.com). They make custom
    prescription inserts for most major brands. I had them make an insert for
    the Oakley M frame. The total cost was less than Oakley's prescription
    product, plus I can switch outer lenses and use the same insert.

    The best prescription lenses are contacts. They won't contribute to
    blurry vision from vibration when riding fast on bumpy roads.

    --
    Bill Bushnell

  12. Jeff Starr said:

    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Fred Hall said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    I just went to my eyeglass-guy, and he showed me a pair of wraparound
    Bolle glasses that can be made to my prescription (and I have progressive
    lenses -- de rigeur for old farts). This seems much better than inserts.

    Hi, what model and how much?

    Not sure. I go for my exam on 7/9, and get glasses maybe a week or so
    thereafter. I will let you know.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember
    _`\(,_ | that your initial objective was to drain the swamp. -- LBJ
    (_)/ (_) |

  13. "Fred Hall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be used
    for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante or
    Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a prescription
    insert to go with them.

    Right now I use my regular glasses that have the magnetic clip-on
    sunglasses, but when I ride, even though they have light plastic lenses they
    are just heavy enough to constantly slip down my nose just enough that I'm
    always either pushing them up with one hand or looking over the top of them.

    My question is, by adding the Rx insert to the wraparound sunglasses, will
    it make them that much heavier and I'll experience the same "slippage"
    problem? Or are they light enough/fit tight enough to stay put? Will I be
    looking over the top of the insert? Anyone with experience using these
    inserts have any insights or alternative recommendations?

    I tried the insert for the Smith Moab glasses, but due to my lousy
    eyes, they were far too thick to fit properly. I ended up with
    contacts, and haven't looked back (har). I too had a bad experience
    with contacts, when I was in high school. But, with the modern
    disposable lenses and a proper fit, I can't complain. In fact, with
    the toric lens my vision has never been better.

    You should try contacts again, and complain if they aren't
    confortable. Most optomologists will let you use sample pairs until
    you get the right fit. If yours won't, find one who does -they get 'em
    for free.

    Eric

  14. Hi. Don't know if this was covered here or not but Rudy Project makes a
    number of sunglasses w/inserts. They also have interchangeable lenses as
    well.

    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jeff Starr said:

    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:01:00 +0000, Fred Hall wrote:

    > I'm looking to get a decent pair of semi-wraparound sunglasses to be


    used

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > for road riding...along the style of something like Bolle Vigilante


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Parole. However, my eyes are bad enough where I'll need a


    prescription

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > insert to go with them.

    I just went to my eyeglass-guy, and he showed me a pair of wraparound
    Bolle glasses that can be made to my prescription (and I have


    progressive

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    lenses -- de rigeur for old farts). This seems much better than


    inserts.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Hi, what model and how much?

    Not sure. I go for my exam on 7/9, and get glasses maybe a week or so
    thereafter. I will let you know.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to


    remember

    Quoted message said:

    _`\(,_ | that your initial objective was to drain the swamp. -- LBJ
    (_)/ (_) |

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.