Road Cycling · Public discussion

Stupid Americanized Stage 9 Finale report

Started by K. J. Papai · · Last activity · 27 posts · 662 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 July 2004
Last activity
15 July 2004
Original author
K. J. Papai
Posts
27
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
662
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 27
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ....
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    -Ken

  2. "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    That's not Americanized. The reports here in the Netherlands are just like
    that. Perhaps words like 'thrilling' are a bit rare, but the bit about it
    being the shortest stage has been repeated a lot.

    Jonathan.

  3. K. J. Papai said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    -Ken

    I can see your point about the feet, but what does "the shortest ride so
    far" have to do with being "Americanized"?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

  4. K. J. Papai said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    -Ken

    Before you dump on "Americans" too quickly...

    I recently spent several weeks in Ireland. Most speed limits are in MPH
    (some are in KMPH). Most highway distances are posted in KILOMETERS.
    Talk about confusing.

    It ain't just Americans who mix and match imperial and metric.

    FWIW

    Jeff

  5. "Jonathan v.d. Sluis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    That's not Americanized. The reports here in the Netherlands are just like
    that. Perhaps words like 'thrilling' are a bit rare, but the bit about it
    being the shortest stage has been repeated a lot.

    Jonathan.

    I thought O'Grady won? Isn't that his point?

  6. Some time ago Flemish Radio 1 had the breaking news that "Robert Millar will
    not participate in this year's Tour".

    And yesterday VRT television news, while bringing the Casagranda-
    Hvastija-thing, showed images of Hruska (Liberty) getting a leader jersey
    somewhere earlier this year. Well sure those names are almost the same, all
    "Eastern Bloc" guys anyway....

  7. Jeff Williams <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    K. J. Papai said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    -Ken

    Before you dump on "Americans" too quickly...

    I recently spent several weeks in Ireland. Most speed limits are in MPH
    (some are in KMPH). Most highway distances are posted in KILOMETERS.
    Talk about confusing.
    It ain't just Americans who mix and match imperial and metric.

    So far all of you WAY missed my point.
    Buncha Freds!

    -Ken

  8. Jeff Williams said:
    K. J. Papai said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)

    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "

    -Ken

    Before you dump on "Americans" too quickly...

    I recently spent several weeks in Ireland. Most speed limits are in MPH
    (some are in KMPH). Most highway distances are posted in KILOMETERS.
    Talk about confusing.

    It ain't just Americans who mix and match imperial and metric.

    FWIW

    Jeff

    I don't mind English measurements at all... it's just when they quote
    odd, overspecific distances like "65.6 feet" for no reason, you know
    they're blindly converting from metric. (65.6 feet just happens to be
    19.99 meters.) Had this originally been written in "American," they
    would have just estimated the distance at 20 yards.

    A superb translation leaves no trace 🙂

  9. K. J. Papai said:

    So far all of you WAY missed my point.
    Buncha Freds!

    -Ken

    According to http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/details/ ,
    Stage 10 is 147.272 miles long.

    Dan

  10. "Dan Connelly" <d_j_c_o.prodigy.com...

    Quoted message said:
    K. J. Papai said:

    So far all of you WAY missed my point.
    Buncha Freds!

    -Ken

    According to http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/details/ ,
    Stage 10 is 147.272 miles long.

    Did they use a slide rule?
    Also, what if someone cuts a corner and shaves 20.3 feet (6.2032 meters)?

    -Ken

  11. "Bob in CT" <ctviggen.x@@news.snet.sbcglobal.net...

    Quoted message said:
    K. J. Papai said:

    From Reuters on Stage 9, McEwen winning;
    notice the "65.6 feet" and "shortest ride so far":
    (the report mixes meters and feet as well)
    "The Australian, leader of the points classification and winner of his
    first stage in Namur a week ago, surged in the last 65.6 feet to beat
    Norwegian Thor Hushovd and Australian Stuart O'Grady, both also stage
    winners on this Tour.
    ...
    "McEwen's win was tight and thrilling as the main bunch caught two
    breakaway riders with about 50 meters left in the shortest ride so
    far. "
    -Ken

    I can see your point about the feet, but what does "the shortest ride so
    far" have to do with being "Americanized"?

    It's not a "ride" -- each day is a "stage".
    A ride denotes a Century or some other club-like thing.

    _Ken_ (1.83 meters tall at 90.4 kg!)

  12. "Ken Papai" wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    _Ken_ (1.83 meters tall at 90.4 kg!)

    You weigh 199.297885 pounds?
    http://www.onlineconversion.com/weight_all.htm

    Are you no longer racing Ken?

    J "78 kg" F

  13. "Jim Flom" <jimflom@12>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ken Papai" wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    _Ken_ (1.83 meters tall at 90.4 kg!)

    You weigh 199.297885 pounds?

    No. You need a new calulator then.
    (90 kgs = 198 lbs is an easy remidner for you)
    Redo your arithmetic.

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.onlineconversion.com/weight_all.htm

    Are you no longer racing Ken?

    Not this year.

    Quoted message said:


    J "78 kg" F

    Skinny!

  14. On 07/14/2004 12:25 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "K. J. Papai"

    Quoted message said:

    "Jim Flom" <jimflom@12>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ken Papai" wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    _Ken_ (1.83 meters tall at 90.4 kg!)

    You weigh 199.297885 pounds?

    No. You need a new calulator then.
    (90 kgs = 198 lbs is an easy remidner for you)
    Redo your arithmetic.

    Redo yours.

    90 kgs is APPROXIMATELY 198 lbs.
    1 kg is APPROXIMATELY 2.2 lbs.

    1 ounce = 28.3495231 grams

    1 kilogram = 35.27396198 ounces = 2.2046226 lbs.

    90.4 kgs * 2.2046226 lbs/kg = 199.2978852 lbs.
    90.0 kgs * 2.2046226 lbs/kg = 198.4150340 lbs.

    198.0 lbs = 89.8112902 kgs.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.onlineconversion.com/weight_all.htm

    Are you no longer racing Ken?

    Not this year.

    Quoted message said:


    J "78 kg" F

    Skinny!

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash

  15. "Steven L. Sheffield" <stevensm...

    Quoted message said:

    On 07/14/2004 12:25 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "K. J. Papai"

    Quoted message said:

    "Jim Flom" <jimflom@12>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ken Papai" wrote...
    >
    > _Ken_ (1.83 meters tall at 90.4 kg!)

    You weigh 199.297885 pounds?

    No. You need a new calulator then.
    (90 kgs = 198 lbs is an easy remidner for you)
    Redo your arithmetic.

    Redo yours.

    90 kgs is APPROXIMATELY 198 lbs.
    1 kg is APPROXIMATELY 2.2 lbs.

    1 ounce = 28.3495231 grams

    1 kilogram = 35.27396198 ounces = 2.2046226 lbs.

    90.4 kgs * 2.2046226 lbs/kg = 199.2978852 lbs.
    90.0 kgs * 2.2046226 lbs/kg = 198.4150340 lbs.

    198.0 lbs = 89.8112902 kgs.

    Thanks S.S. -- does that make me heavier or lighter then?
    I always used 454 grams = 1 pound.

    -Ken/

  16. On 07/14/2004 08:18 PM, in article FPlJc.83281$IQ4.58501@attbi_s02, "Ken

    Papai said:


    "Steven L. Sheffield" <stevensm...

    Quoted message said:

    On 07/14/2004 12:25 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "K. J. Papai"

    Quoted message said:

    "Jim Flom" <jimflom@12>...
    > "Ken Papai" wrote...
    >>
    >> _Ken_ (1.83 meters tall at 90.4 kg!)
    >
    > You weigh 199.297885 pounds?

    No. You need a new calulator then.
    (90 kgs = 198 lbs is an easy remidner for you)
    Redo your arithmetic.

    Redo yours.

    90 kgs is APPROXIMATELY 198 lbs.
    1 kg is APPROXIMATELY 2.2 lbs.

    1 ounce = 28.3495231 grams

    1 kilogram = 35.27396198 ounces = 2.2046226 lbs.

    90.4 kgs * 2.2046226 lbs/kg = 199.2978852 lbs.
    90.0 kgs * 2.2046226 lbs/kg = 198.4150340 lbs.

    198.0 lbs = 89.8112902 kgs.

    Thanks S.S. -- does that make me heavier or lighter then?
    I always used 454 grams = 1 pound.

    1 lb = 453.5923696 grams.

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash

  17. Steven L. Sheffield said:

    On 07/14/2004 08:18 PM, in article FPlJc.83281$IQ4.58501@attbi_s02, "Ken

    Papai said:
    Quoted message said:

    1 ounce = 28.3495231 grams

    28.349523125

    Dan

  18. Steven L. Sheffield said:

    On 07/14/2004 08:18 PM, in article FPlJc.83281$IQ4.58501@attbi_s02, "Ken

    Papai said:
    Quoted message said:

    1 ounce = 28.3495231 grams

    28.349523125

    Dan

  19. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Thanks S.S. -- does that make me heavier or lighter then?
    I always used 454 grams = 1 pound.

    1 lb = 453.5923696 grams.

    2.2 lbs/kg

  20. 454 cubic inches = 10 mpg

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks S.S. -- does that make me heavier or lighter then?
    I always used 454 grams = 1 pound.

    -Ken/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.