Road Cycling · Public discussion

Studded tires

Started by nash · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,314 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 November 2006
Last activity
2 December 2006
Original author
nash
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,314
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size

  1. Quoted message said:


    nash said:

    I was reading the link to nokian and schwalbe stud tires and it said that
    people seem to think having just the front studded is good enough. It
    also
    states why it is not. Keeping in mind they are biased but it made good
    sense too.
    I have seen a stud tires tool too if anyone is still into it but PNW does
    not really warrant it except for this freaky weather we just had.

    I have not read the links but personal experience suggests that only
    one studded tire sounds scarey. In really icy conditions you don't
    want the back tire skidding out from under you which is likely to
    happen as it did last December on the road bike. 🙁 . Also you lose
    drive power since you don't have the rear traction you need. You
    really don't want the back wheel spinning out on you as you're ridding
    along.

    John Kane, Kingston ON Canada

    You did not read the Nokian explanation then.


  2. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > I was reading the link to nokian and schwalbe stud tires and it said
    > that
    > people seem to think having just the front studded is good enough. It
    > also
    > states why it is not.

    That's something I've casually wondered about, myself.
    Could a studded front + non-studded knobby rear be a
    workable compromise while saving $$$ that would otherwise
    be spent on a studded rear tire? I guess that depends on
    how rough and how firm the surface ice is.


    My answer is no. Knobby or not, without studs that rear wheel will slip
    on ice. You'll still go down, and you won't be able to go forward even
    if
    you stay up.


    I've tried it both ways -- I used to have an extra wheel set for the
    studded tires, but now I only have an extra front. The front stud is
    clearly more important --for the same reason as it's better to have your
    "best" tire on the front. If you lose traction on the back, you will go
    down right there. If you lose traction on the front, you lose steering and
    may go anywhere. Studded tires are also slower, for obvious reasons. So,
    for some, a front studded tire might be a good compromise.

    But let's put it this way -- I already own two studded tires, and I've
    ended the experiment with one tire. Part of the problem is that riding
    with one makes you think you can ride like you have two and that can mean
    you go down MORE often.


    1.A front studded will not get you out of ruts. That is the main reason.
    And that front slippage is more dangerous as you said.
    2. I saw tires made for just getting out those ruts. Screw spacing more to
    the outside. 106 works as good as 160 in the right place and is lighter.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.