Road Cycling · Public discussion

Stress score for Giro?

Started by Robert Chung · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,261 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 May 2004
Last activity
14 May 2004
Original author
Robert Chung
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,261
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From the live commentary to today's stage:

    "The peloton isn't in a great hurry today, and is still together after 83
    km of riding. As mentioned before, this is how the Italians race in the
    Giro. It's very different to the Tour or the Vuelta, when the attacks
    start from the gun and don't stop until at least one rider "breaks the
    elastic" and the peloton stops chasing for a while. In the Giro, the speed
    tends to increase as the stage goes on, and the overall average speed is
    generally lower than the other two Grand Tours.

    Although the racing can be slow at times, this style should put less
    stress on the riders"

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, Robert Chung

    Quoted message said:

    From the live commentary to today's stage:

    "The peloton isn't in a great hurry today, and is still together after 83
    km of riding. As mentioned before, this is how the Italians race in the
    Giro. It's very different to the Tour or the Vuelta, when the attacks
    start from the gun and don't stop until at least one rider "breaks the
    elastic" and the peloton stops chasing for a while. In the Giro, the speed
    tends to increase as the stage goes on, and the overall average speed is
    generally lower than the other two Grand Tours.

    Although the racing can be slow at times, this style should put less
    stress on the riders"

    So you think lower average speed equates to less stress? You'll need
    more information about the racing besides average speed to make an
    accurate estimate about the amount of stress on a rider.

    -WG

  3. warren said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Robert Chung

    Quoted message said:

    From the live commentary to today's stage:

    "The peloton isn't in a great hurry today, and is still together after
    83 km of riding. As mentioned before, this is how the Italians race in
    the Giro. It's very different to the Tour or the Vuelta, when the
    attacks start from the gun and don't stop until at least one rider
    "breaks the elastic" and the peloton stops chasing for a while. In the
    Giro, the speed tends to increase as the stage goes on, and the
    overall average speed is generally lower than the other two Grand
    Tours.

    Although the racing can be slow at times, this style should put less
    stress on the riders"

    So you think lower average speed equates to less stress?

    Nope, not me. Jeff does.

  4. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    warren said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Robert Chung
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    So you think lower average speed equates to less stress?

    Nope, not me. Jeff does.


    ....and I didn't say lower average speed = less stress.

    It was more a comment on the fact that they do less "racing kilometres" in
    the Giro compared to the Tour/Vuelta. Analyse a typical stage and you'll see
    what I mean. Sometimes in the Tour they can be racing for the first 100km at
    50 km/h before it settles down, and it picks up at the end, the same as the
    Giro does. In the Vuelta the stages are shorter, but they're still generally
    flat out from the gun, maybe with an interlude in the middle before getting
    hard again at the end.

    The average speed in the Tour and Vuelta is typically higher than the Giro,
    which is a by-product of the style of racing. I guess my basic premise is
    that more racing kilometres = more stress on the body.

    Jeff

  5. Jeff Jones said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    warren said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Robert Chung
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    So you think lower average speed equates to less stress?

    Nope, not me. Jeff does.


    ...and I didn't say lower average speed = less stress.

    It was more a comment on the fact that they do less "racing kilometres"
    in the Giro compared to the Tour/Vuelta. Analyse a typical stage and
    you'll see what I mean. Sometimes in the Tour they can be racing for
    the first 100km at 50 km/h before it settles down, and it picks up at
    the end, the same as the Giro does. In the Vuelta the stages are
    shorter, but they're still generally flat out from the gun, maybe with
    an interlude in the middle before getting hard again at the end.

    The average speed in the Tour and Vuelta is typically higher than the
    Giro, which is a by-product of the style of racing. I guess my basic
    premise is that more racing kilometres = more stress on the body.

    Jeff

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14514543

  6. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:



    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Ab
    stract&list_uids=14514543

    Quoted message said:


    OK, but I'm not sure if that's quite the same thing (it's close).

    Maybe I'm using the wrong definition of "stress" but I'd say that a 40 km
    ride done in 50 minutes is harder on the body than a 40 km ride done in
    1hr20min, even though the time on the bike for the latter is considerably
    longer. Or taken to an extreme, doing 1 km in 1 minute will knock you around
    more than doing 1 km in 2 minutes.

    Jeff

  7. Jeff Jones said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:




    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Ab

    Quoted message said:

    stract&list_uids=14514543

    Quoted message said:


    OK, but I'm not sure if that's quite the same thing (it's close).

    Maybe I'm using the wrong definition of "stress" but I'd say that a 40
    km ride done in 50 minutes is harder on the body than a 40 km ride done
    in 1hr20min, even though the time on the bike for the latter is
    considerably longer.

    Well, in general I'd agree, but is a 40km ride done in 50 minutes harder
    than a 1hr20min ride where you cover 22km in the first hour and 18km in
    the last 20? I don't know, and that's why I was wondering whether the
    piano beginnings of Giro stages really compensated for the fortissimo
    endings.

    BTW, here's a related study, same authors, for only the Tour and Vuelta:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12750600

  8. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Well, in general I'd agree, but is a 40km ride done in 50 minutes harder
    than a 1hr20min ride where you cover 22km in the first hour and 18km in
    the last 20? I don't know, and that's why I was wondering whether the
    piano beginnings of Giro stages really compensated for the fortissimo
    endings.


    To me, a Giro stage goes like: piano - crescendo - fortissmo, whereas a Tour
    stage starts fortissimo (or forte) with a lot of sforzandos, has a short
    piano interlude in the middle, then crescendos to fortissimo punctuated by
    the odd sforzando at the end. I don't know whether they go faster at the end
    of a Giro stage than a Tour stage, but to me it seems to be similar. The
    main difference is the piano beginning at the Giro.

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, here's a related study, same authors, for only the Tour and Vuelta:


    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Ab
    stract&list_uids=12750600

    Quoted message said:


    Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like this? I
    guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And is using only
    three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload on the body?

    Jeff

  9. Jeff Jones said:
    Quoted message said:


    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt
    =Abstract&list_uids=12750600>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like
    this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And
    is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload
    on the body?

    I don't know of anyone else who has, mostly 'cuz the data would be hard to
    come by. These guys had access to HRM data. One of the things you'll
    notice is that the data were supplied by Spanish teams, and the Spanish
    don't send many teams to the Giro. There must be data hiding in the Mapei
    vaults somewhere that one could use to compare the Giro and the Tour. Use
    your cyclingnews.com leverage to get Squinzi to open up. One of the
    coauthors of these two studies told me they were trying to get a couple of
    riders to use SRMs on the Tour and the Vuelta, but the riders balked. I
    wondered myself about the three interval weighting scheme and my rough
    estimate was that if one used a more finely graduated (or continuous)
    scale the Vuelta was no less "stressful" than the Tour (using HR load;
    Coggan has developed a stress scale based on power but, alas, we don't
    have power data).

    I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use
    in the live commentary.

  10. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jeff Jones said:
    Quoted message said:


    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt
    =Abstract&list_uids=12750600>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    [Snippitysnap]

    Quoted message said:


    I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use
    in the live commentary.

    Ditto.

    sfor·zan·do (sfôrt-sän"d½) also for·zan·do (fôrt-sän"d½) --adv. --adj. Abbr. sf., sfz. Music. 1.
    Suddenly and strongly accented. Used chiefly as a direction. --n., pl. sfor·zan·dos or sfor·zan·di
    (-d¶). A sforzando tone or chord. [Italian, gerund of sforzare, to use force : s-, intensive pref.
    (from Latin ex-; see EX-) + forzare, to force (from Vulgar Latin *forti³re, from Latin fortis,
    strong; see FORTIS).] --sfor·zan"do adv.

  11. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use
    in the live commentary.


    Just going with the music dynamics analogy. Sforzando = attack!

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, Robert Chung

    Quoted message said:
    Jeff Jones said:
    Quoted message said:


    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt
    =Abstract&list_uids=12750600>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like
    this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And
    is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload
    on the body?

    I don't know of anyone else who has, mostly 'cuz the data would be hard to
    come by. These guys had access to HRM data. One of the things you'll
    notice is that the data were supplied by Spanish teams, and the Spanish
    don't send many teams to the Giro. There must be data hiding in the Mapei
    vaults somewhere that one could use to compare the Giro and the Tour. Use
    your cyclingnews.com leverage to get Squinzi to open up.

    Squinzi? How about one of the coaches? I made a comment to one that I
    thought the Tour was harder than the Giro but he said the Giro was
    physically harder than the Tour, in large part because the clmbs tend
    to be harder, mostly because they tend to be steeper.

    Even though it's mostly Italian teams in the Giro they race very hard
    (overall) because they care so much about it. The Italians don't care
    nearly as much about racing well in the Tour and most other countries
    don't care as much about the Giro as they do the Tour.

    -WG

  13. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Jeff Jones said:
    Quoted message said:


    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt
    =Abstract&list_uids=12750600>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Interesting as well. Has anyone compared the Giro and the Tour like
    this? I guess the previous study did, although it was only n = 1. And
    is using only three ventilatory thresholds a good measure of workload
    on the body?

    I don't know of anyone else who has, mostly 'cuz the data would be hard to
    come by. These guys had access to HRM data. One of the things you'll
    notice is that the data were supplied by Spanish teams, and the Spanish
    don't send many teams to the Giro. There must be data hiding in the Mapei
    vaults somewhere that one could use to compare the Giro and the Tour. Use
    your cyclingnews.com leverage to get Squinzi to open up. One of the
    coauthors of these two studies told me they were trying to get a couple of
    riders to use SRMs on the Tour and the Vuelta, but the riders balked. I
    wondered myself about the three interval weighting scheme and my rough
    estimate was that if one used a more finely graduated (or continuous)
    scale the Vuelta was no less "stressful" than the Tour (using HR load;
    Coggan has developed a stress scale based on power but, alas, we don't
    have power data).

    I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its use
    in the live commentary.

    I'm disagree somewhat, because terms like "fortissimo," "piano,"
    "crescendo," etc. refer to volume, not speed. (A sforzando is like an
    exclamation point on a single note or chord.)

    There are perfectly acceptable Italian terms in music which DO refer
    to speed and which could be applied in commentary - 'adagio' or
    'lento' for slow, 'andante' for a casual but not draggy speed,
    'vivace' or 'presto' for fast, and 'accelerando,' 'stretto' or my
    favorite, 'stringendo,' for the final mad sprint to the line.

    -Sonarrat.

  14. "Sonarrat" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its


    use

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in the live commentary.

    I'm disagree somewhat, because terms like "fortissimo," "piano,"
    "crescendo," etc. refer to volume, not speed. (A sforzando is like an
    exclamation point on a single note or chord.)


    I know they refer to volume and not speed, but I didn't think up the "piano"
    analogy in the first place. Robert and I merely extended it - probably
    beyond its capacity. Of course it would make more sense to use a speed
    analogy, but that's the beauty of the subtle differences in language.

    Jeff (thinks Crescenzo d'Amore is a pretty cool name for an Italian, but
    that's another thread)

  15. Jeff Jones said:

    To me, a Giro stage goes like: piano - crescendo - fortissmo, whereas a Tour
    stage starts fortissimo (or forte) with a lot of sforzandos, has a short
    piano interlude in the middle, then crescendos to fortissimo punctuated by
    the odd sforzando at the end. I don't know whether they go faster at the end
    of a Giro stage than a Tour stage, but to me it seems to be similar. The
    main difference is the piano beginning at the Giro.

    I hadn't realized that this was the meaning of the word "score" that you
    were using in the subject line...

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jeff Jones' jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com said:

    "Sonarrat" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I didn't know the word "sforzando." I like it, and anxiously await its


    use

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in the live commentary.

    I'm disagree somewhat, because terms like "fortissimo," "piano,"
    "crescendo," etc. refer to volume, not speed. (A sforzando is like an
    exclamation point on a single note or chord.)


    I know they refer to volume and not speed, but I didn't think up the "piano"
    analogy in the first place. Robert and I merely extended it - probably
    beyond its capacity. Of course it would make more sense to use a speed
    analogy, but that's the beauty of the subtle differences in language.

    Jeff (thinks Crescenzo d'Amore is a pretty cool name for an Italian, but
    that's another thread)

    I think it's probably a "stage" name, but I agree and he's on my
    LessYourImage fantasy team...

    -Sonarrat.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.