The message <[email hidden]>
from Roger <[email hidden]> contains these words:
Quoted message said:BMC does of course stand for British Mountaineering Council so there is
nothing odd per se in Scots being members but do the respective
memberships largely reflect country of origin with the Scots joining the
MCofS and the ex pat English the BMC in which case the legendary and
quite possibly generally unjustified reputation of Scots being tight
might play some part. :-)
Devolution for the MCofS came a good deal earlier than it did in the
political field - I think that the MCofS was established as a separate
body in the early '70's (some one correct me, please !) from the
Association of Scottish Climbing Clubs. The BMC Wales Committee has a
good deal of independance and seems to be a bilingual set-up - perhaps
that style might have satisfied the previous generation here - perhaps
not, but not now.
It was ungraceful and ungrateful of me not to mention that the BMC
generously funds near on half of the MCofS' Access and Conservation
work. Not merely is this very welcome, but without it we'd lose our SNH
funding.
The membership figures are skewed, unavoidably, by several big "UK"
clubs, like the three Service ones, as well as the OU Mountaineering
Society, affiliating to the BMC.
Lindsay suggests that I show how "profitable" MCofS membership is for
the Member - although I find my 10% discount at Tiso and several other
outlets quite welcome, that is NOT, in my respectful opinion, what it is
about. We (all of us, members and passengers too, even if they are
unable to admit it) do need some set up to negotiate on Access, to
respond to consultations on Core Paths, Wind Farms, National Park Plans
and a plethora of other things, including the Strathfarrer winter
access.
[And anyone who thinks that the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 solved
for ever all problems in that field, lives in cloud cuckoo land! I
spent much of Wednesday discussing a paper on Access during the Stalking
season for the National Access Forum, and yesterday and today revising
the draft by e-mail. If we didn't do it, a few lairds now, and many more
next year, would effectively "close the hills" from 1 Aug to 20 Oct!]
Richard