Hywel Jenkins said:Tell me, what is the attraction of riding a 'bent?
When I first read about recumbents I was drawn by the lure of greater
speed (due to the superior aerodynamics of many recumbents compared to
many uprights) and by the supposed extra comfort for those with back
problems (having, at the time, recently injured my back playing judo).
By the time I was able to afford a recumbent of my very own (nearly 7
years later), I decided comfort was the priority. The Street Machine is
no slouch (it compares favourably with upright touring bikes for speed),
but it's certainly no racing machine. It is, however, very comfortable.
Quoted message said:but why do people choose recumbents over your
standard upright tourer/commuter bike?
I think speed and comfort have to be the main reasons.
Quoted message said:Are they difficult to get used
to when you first ride them?
YMMV. I've never found a recumbent that I couldn't ride within a few
seconds. Mind you, I've also never tried the Flevobike that bends in
the middle...
Quoted message said:Is there more efficient delivery of power
from the engine through the drivetrain to the wheels?
There shouldn't be a great deal of difference, although realistically
there may be some loss of efficiency from having a much longer chain,
which may need to be routed around pulley wheels or through tubes. The
extra length of chain also adds a fair bit of weight, which isn't a good
thing.
Quoted message said:More comfy?
Very much so. I have ridden an upright road bike that was nearly as
comfy as my Street Machine (must have been a near perfect fit for me),
but even so it wasn't nearly as pleasant to ride simply because it was
so much harder to see where I was going.
(BTW, the reason I was riding that road bike was so that its owner could
have a go on my Street Machine. He was instantly hooked and now rides a
Speed Machine.)
Quoted message said:what is it about them that makes their
riders love them so much?
For me, it's not speed. I could go just as fast on a decent upright
bike. I'd love to get a second, faster recumbent though.
It's not manoeuvrability. That's a definite negative point.
Comfort is important. A well chosen recumbent is *so* much more
comfortable than a wedgie (although it's important to choose a recumbent
that fits you well, just as it is for an upright bike).
Visibility is a big plus for me. Sitting in my comfy chair, I'm
perfectly positioned to look where I'm going without getting a crick in
my neck. That also makes it easier to make eye contact with motorists
(as does the fact that I'm sat at about the same height as them).
Then there's safety. Of course there are no useful studies to show
whether recumbents are safer than uprights, but I feel much safer in my
comfy chair with my relatively low CoG than I do perched on an upright
bike with a higher CoG that could so easily pivot around the handlebar
in the event of a crash.
--
Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
<URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine