Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Standover height on Cannondale Jekyll

Started by Jonathan Presti · · Last activity · 10 posts · 2,055 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
4 December 2003
Last activity
6 December 2003
Original author
Jonathan Presti
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,055
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Looking for some advice on a sizing issue. I have been offered a 2003 Jekyll at a very attractive
    price, but am worried that it is slightly too big for me. I'm about 5'9" and have an inside leg of
    around 31 inches, and the frame is a medium. However, when I checked clearance in the shop there
    wasn't a huge amount - definitely less than 3 inches. My hardtail is a 16.5" custom, which, of
    course fits me perfectly, but I understand that with full suspension you have a higher BB height, so
    the relationship between the contact points is different. The relationship between saddle and bars
    was just about perfect for me on the Jekyll, so if I go for a smaller size, I would end up having to
    fit a longer stem and compromise the handling. The other point is that the Cannondale was not on its
    lowest BB setting when I tested it, so there is perhaps an extra 0.5 inches to be gained. Any advice
    would be greatly appreciated.

    Jonathan Prestidge

  2. "Jonathan prestidge" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Looking for some advice on a sizing issue. I have been offered a 2003 Jekyll at a very attractive
    price, but am worried that it is slightly too big for me. I'm about 5'9" and have an inside leg of
    around 31 inches, and the frame is a medium. However, when I checked clearance in the shop there
    wasn't a huge amount - definitely less than 3 inches. My hardtail is a 16.5" custom, which, of
    course fits me perfectly, but I understand that with full suspension you have a higher BB height,
    so the relationship between the contact points is different. The relationship between saddle and
    bars was just about perfect for me on the Jekyll, so if I go for a smaller size, I would end up
    having to fit a longer stem and compromise the handling. The other point is that the Cannondale
    was not on its lowest BB setting when I tested it, so there is perhaps an extra 0.5 inches to be
    gained. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Jonathan Prestidge

    I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame size small. It fits perfectly.
    Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website is that when you go from a men's
    medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer straight. On the small, it has a bend in it like
    the "feminine" models. Check out the website and you'll see what I mean. Looks at the geometry specs
    carefully and you will see the standover height go from about ~31" on the medium to ~28" on the
    small. This is the reason. You will have a lot more clearance on the small.

    As far as the fit, when I first went from a hardtail to a full squish I did get a little taller bike
    to account for sag, at the recommendation of the salesmen. But I eventually went back to a smaller
    frame with more standover, because when you have to put a foot down through a technical section, the
    sag factor tends to dissappear. I am much more comfortable on a smaller frame. At your size, perhaps
    the small would be a bit too small, but would recommend going with the smaller bike any time a rider
    feels they are on the fence between the two sizes. This is just my personal opinion.

    Also, I wouldn't put any thought into the 3" clearance "rule of thumb" that you hear floating
    around. Depending on the design and your preferences, it could be any number over 1".

    See if they'll let you take the medium out to the trail and tear it up for a while. See how it
    feels. One thing I will say is that the supsension and overall feel of the Jekyll is absolutely
    awesome. It's my 3rd full suspension bike, and by far the best.

    Good luck.

  3. mfgp murmured while asleep:

    Quoted message said:


    I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame size small. It fits perfectly.
    Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website is that when you go from a men's
    medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer straight. On the small, it has a bend in it
    like the "feminine" models. Check out the website and you'll see what I mean.

    my god, we can't have that now, can we? How unmanly.

    ps

  4. "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mfgp murmured while asleep:

    Quoted message said:


    I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame size small. It fits perfectly.
    Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website is that when you go from a
    men's medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer straight. On the small, it has a bend
    in it like the "feminine" models. Check out the website and you'll see what I mean.

    my god, we can't have that now, can we? How unmanly.

    ps

    Ya gotta be gay to ride that thing!
    --
    Slacker

  5. "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mfgp murmured while asleep:

    Quoted message said:


    I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame size small. It fits
    perfectly. Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website is that when you
    go from a men's medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer straight. On the small, it
    has a bend in it like the "feminine" models. Check out the website and you'll see what I mean.

    my god, we can't have that now, can we? How unmanly.

    ps

    Ya gotta be gay to ride that thing!
    --

    And don't forget the shopping basket on he front!

  6. "spademan o---[) *" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mfgp murmured while asleep:
    >
    > I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame


    size

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > small. It fits perfectly. Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website
    > is that when you go from a men's medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer
    > straight. On the small, it has a bend in it like the "feminine" models. Check out the
    > website and you'll see what I mean.

    my god, we can't have that now, can we? How unmanly.

    ps

    Ya gotta be gay to ride that thing!
    --

    And don't forget the shopping basket on he front!

    [censored]....

    Did I mention it's a great bike?

  7. mfgp murmured while asleep:

    Quoted message said:

    "spademan o---[) *" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > mfgp murmured while asleep:
    >>
    >> I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame size small. It fits
    >> perfectly. Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website is that when you
    >> go from a men's medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer straight. On the small, it
    >> has a bend in it like the "feminine" models. Check out the website and you'll see what I mean.
    >
    > my god, we can't have that now, can we? How unmanly.
    >
    > ps

    Ya gotta be gay to ride that thing!
    --

    And don't forget the shopping basket on he front!

    [censored]....

    Did I mention it's a great bike?

    Does it have pink and purple streamers?

    ;-)

    Penny

  8. "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Did I mention it's a great bike?

    Does it have pink and purple streamers?

    ;-)

    Penny


    Shopping for Christmas bike for the girl-child. Purple streamers are not just a luxury item, but
    are, in fact, mandatory equipment. Scoff not!

    Tom

  9. tcmedara murmured while asleep:

    Quoted message said:

    "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Did I mention it's a great bike?

    Does it have pink and purple streamers?

    ;-)

    Penny


    Shopping for Christmas bike for the girl-child. Purple streamers are not just a luxury item, but
    are, in fact, mandatory equipment. Scoff not!

    Tom

    I want some too. They might be overkill with Jean Grey and a daisy helmet tho...

    Penny

  10. "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    mfgp murmured while asleep:

    Quoted message said:

    "spademan o---[) *" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > "Penny S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > "]news:[email hidden]...
    >> mfgp murmured while asleep:
    >>>
    >>> I'm 5'6" with a 30" inseam, and just bought a 2004 Jekyll, frame size small. It fits
    >>> perfectly. Something they don't tell you in the literature or on the website is that when
    >>> you go from a men's medium to a men's small, the top tube is no longer straight. On the
    >>> small, it has a bend in it like the "feminine" models. Check out the website and you'll see
    >>> what I mean.
    >>
    >> my god, we can't have that now, can we? How unmanly.
    >>
    >> ps
    >
    >
    > Ya gotta be gay to ride that thing!
    > --

    And don't forget the shopping basket on he front!

    [censored]....

    Did I mention it's a great bike?

    Does it have pink and purple streamers?

    ;-)

    Penny

    No, but its got wrelly pwetty refwectors and my mommy said she's gonna get me pink tires!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.