Road Cycling · Public discussion

standover clearance fit - important in itself?

Started by Mike Kruger · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,531 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 September 2004
Last activity
9 September 2004
Original author
Mike Kruger
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,531
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. How important is stand-over height on a road bike, in and of iteself?

    I'm a tall guy, 6'3" (190 cm), and I've been riding old road bikes that have
    25" (63.5 cm) frames. I usually end up raising the seat to about where the
    warning line is.

    A taller friend cleaning out his basement gave me an old bike with a 27"
    (68.5 cm) frame. I can get the seat set to the right height; I'm interested
    to try out a bit more reach to the handlebars. I have about half an inch
    standover clearance (when I stand flat footted on the floor, there is about
    half an inch between the top tube and my crotch, maybe less).

    I know standover height is used as a general guide to bike fit, and by this
    standard the bike is too big, but is it important in itself on a road bike
    (where you are less likely to take a spill forward on the top tube than you
    are on a mountain bike ridden on singletrack)? If the bike otherwise fits,
    which I can tell after I clean it up and ride it, should I be concerned?

  2. Mike Kruger said:

    How important is stand-over height on a road bike, in and of iteself?

    I'm a tall guy, 6'3" (190 cm), and I've been riding old road bikes that have
    25" (63.5 cm) frames. I usually end up raising the seat to about where the
    warning line is.

    A taller friend cleaning out his basement gave me an old bike with a 27"
    (68.5 cm) frame. I can get the seat set to the right height; I'm interested
    to try out a bit more reach to the handlebars. I have about half an inch
    standover clearance (when I stand flat footted on the floor, there is about
    half an inch between the top tube and my crotch, maybe less).

    I know standover height is used as a general guide to bike fit, and by this
    standard the bike is too big, but is it important in itself on a road bike
    (where you are less likely to take a spill forward on the top tube than you
    are on a mountain bike ridden on singletrack)? If the bike otherwise fits,
    which I can tell after I clean it up and ride it, should I be concerned?


    I can't speak technically. My own experience with my 61 cm Peugeot
    has been great. It's very well suited for my height, even though it's
    technically too big for me. When I purchased it I was too young and
    stupid to realize I wasn't going to grow more than six feet. However,
    the thing fits great. I've had several accidents and not once did I
    come close to hitting the top tube with my [insert slang here]. On one
    hand I consider myself lucky. On the other hand, I think it may not be
    such a concern as injuries your could get from, say, a seatpost breaking
    off or long-term stress on your back from scrunching up.

  3. Mike Kruger said:

    How important is stand-over height on a road bike, in and of iteself?

    I'm a tall guy, 6'3" (190 cm), and I've been riding old road bikes that have
    25" (63.5 cm) frames. I usually end up raising the seat to about where the
    warning line is.

    A taller friend cleaning out his basement gave me an old bike with a 27"
    (68.5 cm) frame. I can get the seat set to the right height; I'm interested
    to try out a bit more reach to the handlebars. I have about half an inch
    standover clearance (when I stand flat footted on the floor, there is about
    half an inch between the top tube and my crotch, maybe less).

    I know standover height is used as a general guide to bike fit, and by this
    standard the bike is too big, but is it important in itself on a road bike
    (where you are less likely to take a spill forward on the top tube than you
    are on a mountain bike ridden on singletrack)? If the bike otherwise fits,
    which I can tell after I clean it up and ride it, should I be concerned?

    My favorite road bike leaves me with less than an inch of clearance.
    If I put larger tires on, things can get pretty tight. In seven years
    I've never had any impacts. I can't remember any time when the frame
    size has been a problem.

    I've ridden bikes that were too big for periods of time- no standover,
    had to tilt to avoid resting on the top tube. Still no problems.

    If everything else about the bike fits, I'd try it for a period of
    time. At least the price is right.

    Then again, as a kid I had a frame that was to big for me for a couple
    of years, so maybe I learned ways to deal that seem natural to me but
    won't come easy to others.

  4. Mike Kruger said:

    How important is stand-over height on a road bike, in and of iteself?

    I'm a woman, so it is a somewhat less obvious issue. But I happily rode
    a bike with no standover clearance for a while. The issue to me was
    that the reach to the bars would be too long for me with a bike that big.

    Pam

  5. Mike Kruger said:

    How important is stand-over height on a road bike, in and of iteself?

    It depends. :-)

    I'm tall (6'3"😉 with relatively short legs and a relatively long torso, so
    I'm a good candidate for an "oversized" bike.

    When I ordered our Viewpoint tandem, I considered getting one with a larger
    frame, but decided on a frame with a more comfortable standover height
    because (a) we're going to ride it mostly on suburb streets, and I don't
    roll through stop signs and red lights, so there's going to be quite a bit
    of stopping and starting; and (b) it's a tandem and I want to be absolutely
    sure that I'm comfortable keeping the bike upright when we stop.

    But if we were planning to ride it mostly on longer tours, then I might
    have gone with the larger frame.

    Quoted message said:

    A taller friend cleaning out his basement gave me an old bike with a 27"
    (68.5 cm) frame. I can get the seat set to the right height; I'm interested
    to try out a bit more reach to the handlebars. I have about half an inch
    standover clearance (when I stand flat footted on the floor, there is about
    half an inch between the top tube and my crotch, maybe less).

    How often do you stop flat footed? I usually flex my ankle and support my
    weight on the ball of my foot.

    If you're comfortable with the contact between you and the bike when you
    come to a stop (both a controlled stop and a quicker "panic" stop), and the
    bike fits you overall, then go for it.
    --
    Darin McGrew, [email hidden], http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
    Web Design Group, [email hidden], http://www.HTMLHelp.com/

    key ring /'kE 'ri[ng]/ n. device enabling simultaneous loss of multiple keys

  6. Mike Kruger said:

    How important is stand-over height on a road bike, in and of iteself?

    Quoted message said:

    I'm a tall guy, 6'3" (190 cm), and I've been riding old road bikes that have
    25" (63.5 cm) frames. I usually end up raising the seat to about where the
    warning line is.

    Quoted message said:

    A taller friend cleaning out his basement gave me an old bike with a 27"
    (68.5 cm) frame. I can get the seat set to the right height; I'm interested
    to try out a bit more reach to the handlebars. I have about half an inch
    standover clearance (when I stand flat footted on the floor, there is about
    half an inch between the top tube and my crotch, maybe less).

    That should be fine. Were these measurements made while wearing your
    normal cycling shoes?

    The real question is how the top tube length works for you. Are you too
    stretched out, or forced to use a short stem? Got the saddle fore/aft
    position set per KOPS +/- your personal preference? Does the bike
    handle well?

    It sounds to me like your legs are proportionally longer than your upper
    body. If you like the bars high, and don't feel stetched out, this frame
    may work out. This is somewhat the philosophy Rivendell uses.

    Art Harris

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.