Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Square-Tapered Cranks

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 413 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
16 February 2006
Last activity
21 February 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
413
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is there any mechanical advantage (better stress loading) on a square
    aligned square-tapered crankset or a diamond aligned square-tapered
    crankset? Assuming most people really do apply the bulk of the force
    on the down stroke.

    I'm quite curious about this.

    alan.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there any mechanical advantage (better stress loading) on a square
    aligned square-tapered crankset or a diamond aligned square-tapered
    crankset? Assuming most people really do apply the bulk of the force
    on the down stroke.

    No difference.
    ----------------
    Alex

  3. Alex Rodriguez said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there any mechanical advantage (better stress loading) on a square
    aligned square-tapered crankset or a diamond aligned square-tapered
    crankset? Assuming most people really do apply the bulk of the force
    on the down stroke.

    No difference.

    Unless you use one of each and then you can have a Harley crank on your chopper
    bike.

    Ron

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.