Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Spoke tension question

Started by Gary Robinson · · Last activity · 46 posts · 2,175 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 January 2006
Last activity
10 January 2006
Original author
Gary Robinson
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,175
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello,

    I've been using a set of wheels with CXP22 rims and Shimano hubs.

    When checking the bike over I noticed that a number of spokes on the rear
    wheel were very loose. I started tweaking them up, but the wheel went out of
    true. Not being experienced with wheels, I took it down to the LBS,
    explained the problem and asked them to true and tension it.

    Checking the wheel, I've found that while it's nice and true, there's a lot
    of variability in spoke tension on the non-drive side and some of the spokes
    have a lot less tension in them than others.

    My favourite ride is a 10 mile climb, followed by a 10 mile descent. The
    road surface for the first couple of miles of the descent is pretty bad.
    Lots of potholes and cracks, resulting in a rough and bumpy ride. I'm not a
    lightweight either, so I'm sure the wheels aren't having an easy time.

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Thanks
    Gary

  2. Gary Robinson said:

    Checking the wheel, I've found that while it's nice and true, there's a lot
    of variability in spoke tension on the non-drive side and some of the spokes
    have a lot less tension in them than others.

    This is a sign of either a bent rim, or a poor build, or both. Actually,
    if they just re-trued a bent rim, that would be a bad build by definition.

    It's easy to get the wheel true, while the spoke tension is highly
    inconsistent. Say a given spoke is too loose, but the adjacent spokes on
    the other side are also too loose. Then the wheel might be true, but out
    of round. On the other hand, if a given spoke is too loose, but the
    same-side spokes next to it are too tight, then the wheel might look both
    true and round.

    But in these cases the wheel will not stay true.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | Accept risk. Accept responsibility. Put a lawyer out of
    _`\(,_ | business.
    (_)/ (_) |

  3. Quoted message said:

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    First of all, it's important to know that the left and right side
    spokes of rear wheels for derailer bikes, and on several other types of
    rear wheel, use different tensions. There's more tension on the drive
    side spokes, which isn't a good thing but is inherit to any wheel where
    the spoke-end centerline is going to end up anywhere but exactly
    between the two flanges. It's unclear whether you know this or not.

    The rest of the conversation actually gets pretty complex, especially
    when you get into whether the shop did a good/honest job or not. I can
    tell you now that whether they did or not, they did a common one for
    the situation.

    Tension balance among all spokes on each side of a wheel is
    important/beneficial for a few reasons. Large disparities in tension
    make wheels susceptible to become damaged prematurely at best and fail
    at worst. Most wheels out there on dealer-level bikes are built good
    enough that these aren't issues, but aren't as well tension balanced as
    they could be by a long shot (and the argument exists and is pretty
    good that 8/9/10 speed wheels are all damage prone and unsafe for
    basically the same reaons that a shoddily tension-balanced wheel is).
    Truly precise tension balance, beyond the "pretty reasonable" norm,
    gets you an additional level of long-term durability that occurs for
    different physical reasons than the ones that make wheels with slack
    spokes die early. Some wheels aren't capable of this for reasons having
    to do with the construction method and precision of the rim.

    In general, the way that a conventional spoked bike wheel supports
    weight is by the built-in tension loads on each spoke taking turns
    temporarily absorbing the compressive loads the wheel encounters as you
    mount the bike, ride along, hit stuff, etc. At any one time on a 32 or
    36 spoke 26" or 700 wheel, the load on the wheel is shared by about 4
    spokes. That number changes for wheels of different sizes and spoke
    counts. Anytime that a wheel is loaded so much that any of the spokes
    lose all their tension (go slack), it's possible for the wheel to
    become damaged, or fail in some (usually but not always extreme) cases.
    Clearly, this indicates that it's not good to have spokes that are
    slack or near-slack before you even get on the bike. If the tension
    imbalance in your wheel is extreme enough, which sounds possible, the
    wheel could fail or become damaged as a result. It most likely was
    already damaged from being ridden in the conditions you describe with
    loose spokes, and those spokes probably became loose because the wheel
    was always undertensioned or poorly tension balanced.

    The type of damage that occurs most often is that the rim becomes
    deformed. Once this has occurred, and it usually already has by the
    time someone gets into the type of situation you're describing (big
    rider, big bumps, bike that actually gets ridden, noticeable spoke
    tension issues after a shop has already laid hands on it), it's
    impossible to make the wheel both true and tension balanced at the same
    time. If you understand the basics of how wheel truing works -tighten a
    spoke and the rim moves in that spoke's direction-, you can probably
    understand why. The only way a wheel can be both as perfectly true and
    perfectly tension balanced as bike wheels get is if the rim is
    perfectly straight and round before it has any spoke tension acting on
    it. (And no wheel can be absolutely perfect in this regard, because
    rims are all stiffer at the seam and so they respond to tension
    differently there, making either tension disparities or radial truth
    disparities inevitable).

    It's also common for loose spokes to allow the nipple to move when
    ridden, making the spokes looser and perpetuating both the
    nipple-loosening and the rim-damaging problem.

    That the left spokes have tension differences that are easy to feel by
    hand isn't good, but how bad it is depends on how large the differences
    are and whether any spokes are completely slack, or close to it. 8/9/10
    speed wheels usually have very loose left spokes, which sucks and makes
    these wheels inherently less durable (because even though the wheel has
    the very-tight right spokes to support it, the left ones still are
    forced to operate at very low or, in practice with many typical
    mass-produced wheels, basically no tension. This is especially true of
    wheels with light rims. That mass-produced wheels are usually built way
    under-tension and with poor tension balance anyway makes the problem a
    lot worse).

    It's easier to feel differences in tension between lower-tension spokes
    by hand than it is with higher-tensioned ones. Among the less-tensioned
    spokes, smaller variances in tension also result in easier to feel
    differences than they do on spokes in a higher tension range. So based
    on your description, it is possible that things are basically okay, and
    that the left-side spokes are all in the reasonable-but-not-stellar
    range, and that you managed to avoid significantly damaging the wheel
    when you were riding it with loose spokes before. However, it's not
    likely at all. What's probably going on is that the rim is now messed
    up and whoever trued the wheel compensated for that by letting spoke
    tensions be uneven, probably in the right side spokes as well, and also
    probably didn't do anything to correct a too-low-to-begin-with tension
    level, which most wheels that are having problems but aren't being
    abused are suffering from. And they also probably didn't make the
    tension balance on the wheel as good as it could be while still true,
    either, which is hard to do on a messed up rim. And it's also likely
    the wheel is laterally pretty true but far from as-good-as-it-gets
    radially. This is all fairly standard practice for shops, and whether
    it's particularly wrong or they should have told you or should have
    pointed you to a new wheel or whatever is a complicated discussion, and
    depends on how bad your wheel really is, which I can't tell from here.
    Most shop mechanics deal with a *lot* of wheels having some form of
    these problems. Mass-produced wheels that get ridden, especially by
    heavier riders, are basically guaranteed to have them, unless they get
    loved up before being ridden by someone who knows what they're doing
    and is willing to spend more time on them than an average bike shop can
    afford to spend on a wheel true at market rate.

    However, if this is to the point where any spokes on the wheel are
    completely slack, or obviously close to it, and the shop handed it to
    you that way with no warning and told you to ride it, that's
    irresponsible and wrong of them. Loose spokes do cause wheel failure in
    practice, just not very often. Where to draw the line in practice of
    how loose or imbalanced is too much is something that's basically
    glossed over day-to-day in most shops.

    And the reason I bother writing all this is because I'm also no
    lightweight rider, and this [censored] needs to be more understood so that
    heavy people can ride bikes.

  4. "Nate Knutson" wrote:
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    First of all, it's important to know that the left and right side
    spokes of rear wheels for derailer bikes, and on several other types of
    rear wheel, use different tensions. There's more tension on the drive
    side spokes, which isn't a good thing but is inherit to any wheel where
    the spoke-end centerline is going to end up anywhere but exactly
    between the two flanges. It's unclear whether you know this or not.

    I'm not sure if I understood all of the wisdom (I'm pretty sure I didn't)
    and I'm not sure if you understand my English but I have to ask a question:

    what about Sram hubs (and probably some others too) which have flanges
    located symmetrically from the hub center (rim is exactly in the middle
    between the flanges)? They should allow to build wheels with equally
    tensioned spokes at both sides. However the distance between flanges is
    reduced. Are wheels build on these hubs stronger than "classic" ones?

    --
    marcin
    www.enduro.95mb.com - it is in Polish however you can find here some
    pictures from an overhaul of Z1 FR SL and AVA RL (click on the "rower"😉

  5. Marcin J. said:

    what about Sram hubs (and probably some others too) which have flanges
    located symmetrically from the hub center (rim is exactly in the middle
    between the flanges)? They should allow to build wheels with equally
    tensioned spokes at both sides. However the distance between flanges is
    reduced. Are wheels build on these hubs stronger than "classic" ones?

    Yes, this makes for a stronger wheel.

  6. Gary Robinson said:

    Hello,

    I've been using a set of wheels with CXP22 rims and Shimano hubs.

    When checking the bike over I noticed that a number of spokes on the rear
    wheel were very loose. I started tweaking them up, but the wheel went out of
    true. Not being experienced with wheels, I took it down to the LBS,
    explained the problem and asked them to true and tension it.

    Checking the wheel, I've found that while it's nice and true, there's a lot
    of variability in spoke tension on the non-drive side and some of the spokes
    have a lot less tension in them than others.

    My favourite ride is a 10 mile climb, followed by a 10 mile descent. The
    road surface for the first couple of miles of the descent is pretty bad.
    Lots of potholes and cracks, resulting in a rough and bumpy ride. I'm not a
    lightweight either, so I'm sure the wheels aren't having an easy time.

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Thanks
    Gary

    Couple of things. If the rim is not round, the tension will jot be even
    on the left OR right side. If it's not round due to riding, impacts,
    etc, then a wheel can either have even tension and not be round or true
    or it can be round and true but with a used rim, the tension will vary.

    I would say on an older rim, getting the tension as close as possible
    is the key to a long term use w/o problem, not having it look good on a
    truing stand.

  7. Marcin J. said:

    "Nate Knutson" wrote:
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    First of all, it's important to know that the left and right side
    spokes of rear wheels for derailer bikes, and on several other types of
    rear wheel, use different tensions. There's more tension on the drive
    side spokes, which isn't a good thing but is inherit to any wheel where
    the spoke-end centerline is going to end up anywhere but exactly
    between the two flanges. It's unclear whether you know this or not.

    I'm not sure if I understood all of the wisdom (I'm pretty sure I didn't)
    and I'm not sure if you understand my English but I have to ask a question:

    what about Sram hubs (and probably some others too) which have flanges
    located symmetrically from the hub center (rim is exactly in the middle
    between the flanges)? They should allow to build wheels with equally
    tensioned spokes at both sides. However the distance between flanges is
    reduced. Are wheels build on these hubs stronger than "classic" ones?

    Wheels are all about triangles with the 'base' being the distance
    between the flanges. If that 'base' is too small, the wheel won't be
    reliable. Sram hubs make for good wheels as do all other hubs out there
    if the components chosen are appropriate for the rider and their needs
    and the build is a good one.

  8. In article <%o0vf.18050$Uf7.752@trnddc01>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello,
    I've been using a set of wheels with CXP22 rims and Shimano hubs.
    When checking the bike over I noticed that a number of spokes on the rear
    wheel were very loose. I started tweaking them up, but the wheel went out of
    true. Not being experienced with wheels, I took it down to the LBS,
    explained the problem and asked them to true and tension it.
    Checking the wheel, I've found that while it's nice and true, there's a lot
    of variability in spoke tension on the non-drive side and some of the spokes
    have a lot less tension in them than others.

    different spoke tension on spokes on the same side of a rear wheel is not good.
    Ideally you want the spokes to be evenly tensioned. There are two reasons
    that can cause this. The first is if the rim is damaged. When you have a
    damaged rim that is not flat, then you have to run different tension to get
    the rim true. You can try to fix the rim by loosening all the spokes and then
    trying to straighten the bent sections. This is difficult to get right and
    often not worth the effort. The other reason the tension is off is that the
    person who fixed your wheel didn't do a good job. They just turned the nipples
    to get the rim straight and did not bother trying to even out the tension
    across spokes.

    Quoted message said:

    My favourite ride is a 10 mile climb, followed by a 10 mile descent. The
    road surface for the first couple of miles of the descent is pretty bad.
    Lots of potholes and cracks, resulting in a rough and bumpy ride. I'm not a
    lightweight either, so I'm sure the wheels aren't having an easy time.

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Eventually the spokes will lower tension will go slack and cause your wheel
    to go out of true again.
    ---------------
    Alex

  9. Marcin J. said:

    what about Sram hubs (and probably some others too) which have flanges
    located symmetrically from the hub center (rim is exactly in the middle
    between the flanges)? They should allow to build wheels with equally
    tensioned spokes at both sides. However the distance between flanges is
    reduced. Are wheels build on these hubs stronger than "classic" ones?

    I built some American Classic hubs into Velocity OC, both 700c and
    650c. The spoke tension is almost the same on each side of the hub.
    One might conclude that a dishless wheel is stronger but I don't think
    so. The distance between the flanges on these hubs is narrower than
    most other hubs and that doesn't make stronger. In my thinking, if
    you permit the distances between flanges approach zero, the lateral
    support of the rim becomes zero.

  10. Nate Knutson said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Quoted message said:

    First of all, it's important to know that the left and right side
    spokes of rear wheels for derailer bikes, and on several other types
    of rear wheel, use different tensions. There's more tension on the
    drive side spokes, which isn't a good thing but is inherit to any
    wheel where the spoke-end centerline is going to end up anywhere but
    exactly between the two flanges. It's unclear whether you know this
    or not.

    I think the term would better be "right side" spokes, some hubs today
    having the drive (crossed spokes) on the left and radial on the right.
    The asymmetry arising from the gear cluster being on the right side
    and displacing the hub to the left. Besides, "drive side" sounds
    pretentious and has a ring of insider jargon that thrives in
    bicycling.

    Quoted message said:

    The rest of the conversation actually gets pretty complex,
    especially when you get into whether the shop did a good/honest job
    or not. I can tell you now that whether they did or not, they did a
    common one for the situation.

    If spokes within one side of a rear wheel cannot be brought into
    uniform tension it means the rim has kinks in it that will prevent it
    from being a reliably true wheel. That is to say, it was either a
    faulty rim from the start (which is unlikely) or it experienced a
    damaging event (crash). Such rims can be rehabilitated, if the bends
    are not too abrupt, by bending the rim while the wheel is partially
    tensioned. It cannot be done reasonably without spoke tension.

    Jobst Brandt

  11. Marcin J? said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    First of all, it's important to know that the left and right side
    spokes of rear wheels for derailer bikes, and on several other
    types of rear wheel, use different tensions. There's more tension
    on the drive side spokes, which isn't a good thing but is inherit
    to any wheel where the spoke-end centerline is going to end up
    anywhere but exactly between the two flanges. It's unclear whether
    you know this or not.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure if I understood all of the wisdom (I'm pretty sure I
    didn't) and I'm not sure if you understand my English but I have to
    ask a question:

    Quoted message said:

    What about SRAM hubs (and probably some others too) which have
    flanges located symmetrically from the hub center (rim is exactly in
    the middle between the flanges)? They should allow to build wheels
    with equally tensioned spokes at both sides. However the distance
    between flanges is reduced. Are wheels build on these hubs stronger
    than "classic" ones?

    That depends on ho closely the flanges are spaced. I'm sure that the
    reason for flange spacing is obvious because otherwise bicycle wheels
    would not need two flanges, the lateral strength of the wheel coming
    from the lateral slope of the spokes, the larger the wheel, the
    greater the flange spacing needs to be.

    Even with unequal tension in spokes on left and right, the more widely
    spaced asymmetrical rear wheel is stronger than the narrow spaced
    symmetrical one for lateral stability but if spoke tension of the
    left side is too low, these spokes may become loose under radial
    loading and allow spoke nippled to unscrew.

    With machine built wheels these days, sufficiently tensioned reliable
    wheels are harder to find because machines, up to now anyway, cannot
    master spoke twist that occurs as spoke become tighter, therefore,
    they are set to cease tensioning at a lower than adequate level. For
    this reason thread lock lubricants have been introduced to arrest spoke
    nipple rotation after a wheel is built. This is a band-aid, so to
    speak, that covers a wheel deficiency without correcting it.

    Jobst Brandt

  12. Gary Robinson said:


    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Yup. The shop probably just did the minimum to make it true... and that
    is not good. On a wheel with lots of spokes it isn't difficult to make
    a wheel run true even if the tension is uneven... especially if the
    tension is lower than optimum.

    Do these have Shimano 2200 hubs and generic 14g spokes? If so, then I
    have the same wheels. Since machine-built wheels come undertensioned in
    the rear (as Jobst mentioned), I increased the tension soon after I got
    mine. I don't have a tensiometer, so I just guessed on tension. I also
    didn't worry about getting the tension perfectly even, which would have
    taken a lot more work. They went for 5,000 miles, perfectly true
    without being touched... but then I started popping spokes. So far 1 on
    the front, and 2 on each side on the rear in the last 2,000 miles. I
    don't know if the cause was a poor build or bad spokes, or both... but
    if I could do it over again, I'd loosen all the spokes until they were
    slack, then use Jobst's procedure for building a wheel. Sheldon Brown
    also has a basic procedure for building a wheel on his website. The
    only tool you need is a spoke wrench... and some lube.

    If any more spokes break, I'm going to buy a whole new set of DB spokes
    and start over. I'm quite happy with the rims... they seem to be
    durable (no spoke hole cracking!) and have a thick braking surface.
    Hubs are fine too... cheap, but they work.

  13. Quoted message said:

    Even with unequal tension in spokes on left and right, the more widely
    spaced asymmetrical rear wheel is stronger than the narrow spaced
    symmetrical one for lateral stability but if spoke tension of the
    left side is too low, these spokes may become loose under radial
    loading and allow spoke nippled to unscrew.

    I don't believe that this is entirely true. An exception is a wheel
    with paired spokes; a pure radial load changes the tension in both
    spokes proportionally, so both reach zero at the same applied force.
    Asymmetric loosening of spokes in a paired spoke rim is due to lateral
    loading. For a normal rim, things are more complicated.

    Joe Riel

  14. Joe Riel said:
    Quoted message said:

    Even with unequal tension in spokes on left and right, the more widely
    spaced asymmetrical rear wheel is stronger than the narrow spaced
    symmetrical one for lateral stability but if spoke tension of the
    left side is too low, these spokes may become loose under radial
    loading and allow spoke nippled to unscrew.

    I don't believe that this is entirely true. An exception is a wheel
    with paired spokes; a pure radial load changes the tension in both
    spokes proportionally, so both reach zero at the same applied force.
    Asymmetric loosening of spokes in a paired spoke rim is due to lateral
    loading. For a normal rim, things are more complicated.

    I'm not following your logic. If say, the left side spokes are half the
    tension of the right side in order to center the rim, then a radial
    load that completely detensions the left side will only reduce the
    right side tension by a little over half. Doesn't really matter if the
    spokes are paired or not.

  15. Joe Riel said:
    Quoted message said:

    Even with unequal tension in spokes on left and right, the more widely
    spaced asymmetrical rear wheel is stronger than the narrow spaced
    symmetrical one for lateral stability but if spoke tension of the
    left side is too low, these spokes may become loose under radial
    loading and allow spoke nippled to unscrew.

    I don't believe that this is entirely true. An exception is a wheel
    with paired spokes; a pure radial load changes the tension in both
    spokes proportionally, so both reach zero at the same applied force.
    Asymmetric loosening of spokes in a paired spoke rim is due to lateral
    loading. For a normal rim, things are more complicated.

    I guess my other post disappeared, so I'll try again...

    If you displace the rim radially, the spokes on both sides will see
    nearly the same tension change... in other words a radial load will
    completely detension the left side spokes long before the right,
    because the left side has much lower initial tension. Doesn't matter if
    it is paired-spoke or not.

    That's why it makes sense (to me) to use light DB spokes (1.6mm or
    less) on the left side, since it takes a greater displacement for them
    to lose tension.

  16. Nate Knutson said:
    Joe Riel said:
    Quoted message said:

    Even with unequal tension in spokes on left and right, the more widely
    spaced asymmetrical rear wheel is stronger than the narrow spaced
    symmetrical one for lateral stability but if spoke tension of the
    left side is too low, these spokes may become loose under radial
    loading and allow spoke nippled to unscrew.

    I don't believe that this is entirely true. An exception is a wheel
    with paired spokes; a pure radial load changes the tension in both
    spokes proportionally, so both reach zero at the same applied force.

    I don't understand how this could possibly be true as you put it. This
    doesn't apply to conventional wheels and I fail to see how it would be
    different for paired-spoke ones.

    Fortunately, you don't have to do any math to demonstrate this. Start
    with a spoked wheel with zero tension in the spokes, but all just
    snugged up (we're going to ignore the effect of "bedding in"😉. Now,
    rather than tightening the wheel we're going to put it in tension by
    expanding the rim (don't worry that this isn't practical, this is a
    thought experiment). Assume that the change in length of the spokes
    during this process is negligible compared to the geometry of the
    wheel. Because the spokes don't change length, the starting angles
    are identical to the final angles after the rim is expanded. That is,
    the rim doesn't move laterally as it is expanded.

    Expanding the rim is a pure radial load. If we reverse it, that is,
    apply a pure radial compressive load, the tensions in the spoke will
    decrease and, because they started with identical (zero) tension
    will each reach zero tension concurrently. Note this is independent
    of the spoke angle.

    Now, it isn't true that the spokes don't change length. I'll have
    to think about this a bit more, but I don't believe it affects the
    argument. That is, even though the rim may shift laterally as the
    spokes compress/elongate, reversing the procedure (as in the thought
    experiment) just causes them to move oppositely, so both sides
    reach zero tension at the same time (some hand-waving involved 8-).

    Joe Riel

  17. Jobst Brandt said:


    I think the term would better be "right side" spokes, some hubs today
    having the drive (crossed spokes) on the left and radial on the right.
    The asymmetry arising from the gear cluster being on the right side
    and displacing the hub to the left. Besides, "drive side" sounds
    pretentious and has a ring of insider jargon that thrives in
    bicycling....

    However, people like Sheldon Brown confuse the issue by building
    left-hand-drive bicycles: <http://sheldonbrown.org/gunnar/index.htm>.
    😉

    --
    Tom Sherman - Fox River Valley

  18. Joe Riel said:
    Quoted message said:

    Even with unequal tension in spokes on left and right, the more widely
    spaced asymmetrical rear wheel is stronger than the narrow spaced
    symmetrical one for lateral stability but if spoke tension of the
    left side is too low, these spokes may become loose under radial
    loading and allow spoke nippled to unscrew.

    I don't believe that this is entirely true. An exception is a wheel
    with paired spokes; a pure radial load changes the tension in both
    spokes proportionally, so both reach zero at the same applied force.
    Asymmetric loosening of spokes in a paired spoke rim is due to lateral
    loading. For a normal rim, things are more complicated.

    Joe Riel

    you are correct about pure radial loads. but being as we don't see pure
    radial loads in the real world, and spoke angle affects tension delta on
    lateral loading, left side spokes on highly dished wheels do "appear" to
    slacken first because they do loosen.

  19. Gary Robinson said:

    Hello,

    I've been using a set of wheels with CXP22 rims and Shimano hubs.

    When checking the bike over I noticed that a number of spokes on the rear
    wheel were very loose. I started tweaking them up, but the wheel went out of
    true. Not being experienced with wheels, I took it down to the LBS,
    explained the problem and asked them to true and tension it.

    Checking the wheel, I've found that while it's nice and true, there's a lot
    of variability in spoke tension on the non-drive side and some of the spokes
    have a lot less tension in them than others.

    My favourite ride is a 10 mile climb, followed by a 10 mile descent. The
    road surface for the first couple of miles of the descent is pretty bad.
    Lots of potholes and cracks, resulting in a rough and bumpy ride. I'm not a
    lightweight either, so I'm sure the wheels aren't having an easy time.

    Do I need to worry about the variability in spoke tension?

    Thanks
    Gary


    if the rims are still true, and the spokes have been bedded in
    sufficiently, the spoke tension should remain relatively even [on the
    same side, not side to side] in use. find a decent wheel builder
    [unfortunately not so easy] or learn how to do this job yourself.
    there's plenty of online sources of info on this subject. check out
    sheldon's web site in particular.

  20. Quoted message said:


    I think the term would better be "right side" spokes, some hubs today
    having the drive (crossed spokes) on the left and radial on the right.
    The asymmetry arising from the gear cluster being on the right side
    and displacing the hub to the left. Besides, "drive side" sounds
    pretentious and has a ring of insider jargon that thrives in
    bicycling.

    "Drive side" means the side of the bike with the drivetrain. There are
    commercially available bikes with left side drivetrains. Right becomes
    left when you turn the front of the bike towards you, or when you flip
    it upside down. But even on an upside-down and backwards bike with
    left side drive, "drive side" is still the drive side.

    Chalo Colina

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.