A Muzi said:Just A User said:I know this has probably been covered her before, but here it is again.
This morning while out on a moderate intensity ride I heard a familiar
/ping/ noise that I recognized as a spoke breaking. This is the third
spoke I have broken in 2 years. Not what I would call a lot, but more
than I would like. The wheels are inexpensive Alex R500, that came on
my 2005 Fuji Ace. The bike isn't great, but good enough for me for
now. So the question is are /aftermarket/ spokes higher quality?
Worthwhile to rebuild the wheels with better spokes or just replace
the one that broke? Should I learn to replace them myself? Or just
drop the wheel off at the LBS and have them do it? I enjoy tinkering
with bikes.
Although there may be a difference in spoke material from what you have
(unknown) to premium stainless butted spokes, a larger difference is
likely to be achieved by getting uniform and proper tension on that wheel.
indeed. but at this stage, respoking is probably the best bet. 3 strikes.
Quoted message said:
From here, none of us can evaluate that nor rectify it. Is there a good
LBS near you who can advise specifically? Low or uneven spoke tension
leads to spoke failure as the loads are borne by a small number of
spokes rather than being spread through them as a group.
If you're interested in this area generally, 'The Bicycle Wheel' is the
definitive work.
you know, it's really not. it outlines how to calculate spoke length,
lace a wheel, how undertake "stress relief", how to repair and how to
tension - and in all those respects, it's just dandy. but when it comes
to engineering theory, it sucks - spoke tension "as high as the rim can
bear" for example.
if the former attributes are all that's required, there are a number of
alternative sources, most of which are online and free. the
downloadable mavic pdf's and sheldon's web site for example. but if the
reader has an interest in theory and doesn't already have a good grasp
of sound principles, he's likely to be led seriously astray by this book
in its current form. it contains a number of fundamental theory flaws
and needs extensive revision accordingly.