rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

spoke lacing and profile crank question

Started by Seager · · Last activity · 13 posts · 403 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
17 October 2005
Last activity
20 October 2005
Original author
Seager
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
403
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Two questions:

    1) Which do you recommend for a trials wheel and why: A 3 cross or a 4
    cross?

    2) When was the last year profile made silver cranks with a regular
    bold head instead of an alan wrench to tighten them on? (they have a
    spider as well)

    Mark and I were trying to figure that out tonight. Thanks.

    --
    Seager

    'Team RoadShow' (http://www.teamroadshow.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Seager's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8840
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  2. Seager...

    1) I built my old trials wheel 3 cross. With 4 cross, the spokes may
    enter the rim at a weird angle, on such a small rim. But I could be
    wrong.

    2) I have no idea when they were made. 😕

    Mojoe

    --
    Mojoe

    9 mile skid on a 10 mile ride...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mojoe's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/533
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  3. Yea, the spokes are actually digging into the hub flanges on a 4-cross
    I've got. It's kind of crazy.

    --
    Seager

    'Team RoadShow' (http://www.teamroadshow.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Seager's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8840
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  4. 1) 4 cross will give you a stronger wheel

    2) I don't think profile ever used a hex head bolt

    --
    onetrack

    "People over here have a dangerous habit of adding quotes to signature
    lines."
    -Klaas Bil
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    onetrack's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6374
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  5. I say forget about the 4x spoke pattern and go with 3x because they are
    the most comon and if you make a wheel with a lets say and alex dx 32
    rim with stainless spokes you should bend any crank on the market
    before you ruin your wheel unless you land realy bad but then it
    will be a bone that breaks

    --
    byza_dog

    Why cart two wheels around when you only need one?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    byza_dog's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10323
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  6. Onetrack, I'll post a picture if you want but they are standard bolt
    heads that you use a socket wrench on. I wasn't able to get a clear
    story about their origin so I was just wondering how old they are.
    Just for the heck of it. I didn't know they existed either. They also
    seem to be 140s...

    --
    Seager

    'Team RoadShow' (http://www.teamroadshow.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Seager's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8840
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  7. Use 3 cross, it is plenty strong. 4 cross sometimes runs into a problem
    where the spokes are leaving the hub at too close to tangential.

    I'm pretty sure profile doesn't (and hasn't) made 140s.

    Is there a reason why you want the ones with the hex head?

    --
    TheObieOne3226

    'SWAT Gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/SWAT)
    'SWAT webpage' (singlewheeledattackteam.1hwy.com)
    'Arrow Racing' (http://www.arrowracing.com/)
    'Sixsixone' (http://www.sixsixone.com)

    \"obie is definately a trend setter, i got in to unicycling because of
    him, and came here because of him\" - kj-52

    \"try not to annoy the great obie, for he is better than us.\" - murde
    mental

    *disclaimer: the above message was not intended to offend anyone. if
    you are offended i can take no responsibility for my actions because i
    don't feel like it. also you are reading an internet newsgroup where
    not everyone will share your same views and beliefs, be able to take
    criticism and post/read threads at your own risk.*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TheObieOne3226's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4851
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  8. well, I have the ones with the hex head, I'm just wondering what their
    history is. I don't know that they are 140's, but when held up next to
    KH140s they sure look the same length. I know they've gotten down to
    145 in the past (and make some now)

    --
    Seager

    'Team RoadShow' (http://www.teamroadshow.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Seager's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8840
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  9. Seager said:

    well, I have the ones with the hex head, I'm just wondering what their
    history is. I don't know that they are 140's, but when held up next to
    KH140s they sure look the same length. I know they've gotten down to
    145 in the past (and make some now)

    Yeah, I just remembered that my friends profiles on his bike have the
    hex head. Dunno how old they are though. I think the shortest profile
    can make cranks is 145 for some reason having to do with their machines
    not going small enough or something.

    --
    TheObieOne3226

    'SWAT Gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/SWAT)
    'SWAT webpage' (singlewheeledattackteam.1hwy.com)
    'Arrow Racing' (http://www.arrowracing.com/)
    'Sixsixone' (http://www.sixsixone.com)

    \"obie is definately a trend setter, i got in to unicycling because of
    him, and came here because of him\" - kj-52

    \"try not to annoy the great obie, for he is better than us.\" - murde
    mental

    *disclaimer: the above message was not intended to offend anyone. if
    you are offended i can take no responsibility for my actions because i
    don't feel like it. also you are reading an internet newsgroup where
    not everyone will share your same views and beliefs, be able to take
    criticism and post/read threads at your own risk.*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TheObieOne3226's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4851
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  10. I'd like to see a pic. there are quite a few profile look alikes
    floating around that use hex bolts (which would explain it being a
    140mm crank). Also, it's not like the allen bolt has to be used. A
    previous owner could have swaped it out for a hex bolt.

    Quoted message said:

    I say forget about the 4x spoke pattern and go with 3x because they are
    the most comon and if you make a wheel with a lets say and alex dx 32
    rim with stainless spokes you should bend any crank on the market
    before you ruin your wheel unless you land realy bad but then it will
    be a bone that breaks

    I would just like to note, that going 4 cross wont be any harder to
    build, or cost any more than 3 cross, but you will end up with a
    stronger wheel. And what if you do "land realy bad" wouldn't you rather
    know that you are using the strongest lacing patern?

    The fewer the crosses, the stiffer. the more crosses, the stronger.
    radial being the stiffest and weakest, and 4 cross being the strongest
    but having the most flex.

    19" wheels are really stout, which is why 3 cross will hold up under
    abusive riding. but if you would like your wheel to be truer, longer,
    I'd go 4.

    --
    onetrack

    "People over here have a dangerous habit of adding quotes to signature
    lines."
    -Klaas Bil
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    onetrack's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6374
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  11. I haven't seen evidence that wheels with fewer crossings are stiffer. I
    don't see why they would be so, either; certainly radially spoked
    wheels would feel quite loose on a unicycle, due to wind-up.

    I also don't think four-cross is inherently stronger than three-cross;
    if four-cross causes weird spoke angles at the hub or rim, it will put
    stresses on the spokes which will be more likely to lead to spoke
    failure.

    --
    tholub
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tholub's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/804
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  12. The story behind the bolts is that the Hex head bolts that you see on
    lots of BMX bikes are the standard profile bolts. Buy a profile
    crank/bottombracket set and it should ship with those regular hex
    bolts. The allen bolts we use are known as the profile "[censored]' bolts"
    and can be bought at extra cost. For some reason the profile unicycle
    hub has always shipped with the [censored] bolts standard.

    4 cross isn't neccessarily stronger on a 19" wheel because opf the odd
    angles and stresses the spokes are exposed to. Also, a 19" wheel
    doesn't really need that extra strength, since it's so small. On top of
    all of this, it depends what kind of strength you're wondering about.
    For axial flex during pedaling, the more crosses, generally the
    stronger, however for lateral flex during hops, there's not nearly as
    much difference between 3 cross and four, since the spacing of the
    spokes isn't really changing.

    Both my trials and muni wheels are 3 cross and I've never had problems
    with flex or tacoing. I think that the quality of the wheel build plays
    a far bigger part in the wheel strength than the soke pattern.

    --
    gerblefranklin

    http://gallery.unicyclist.com/Trials-Muni

    Nick's main man.

    "I love freedom dearly, ideally, in theory, but in reality we're not
    there yet--Not nearly."--Cold Duck Complex
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gerblefranklin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4295
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/44015

  13. tholub said:
    Ian Smith said:


    However, the stiffness of the 'rigid' parts of the wheel (hub,
    spokes, rim) pale into insignificance compared to the behaviour of the
    tyre. While the wheel may be stiffer, what you 'feel' radially will
    be the behaviour of the tyre.

    I think it is, though only slightly - a good three three-cross will
    probably be better than a merely average four-cross.

    Regarding radial stiffness, you note yourself on your page that "it
    should be apparent that the answer is that different spoking makes very
    little difference to the stiffness." The difference between
    three-cross and four-cross in your example is .0028mm maximal
    deflection; that is four orders of magnitude less than the tire
    deflection of a MUni or trials tire, well below any level of human
    perception.

    Yes, that's what I said above, too.

    Quoted message said:

    The strength of a wheel is largely a function of the spoke tension.

    Yes, that's what I said above, too (although indirectly, referring to
    "good three-cross", and "merely average four-cross"😉.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.