UK and Europe · Public discussion

Spindrift: The Truth

Started by Nuxx Bar · · Last activity · 28 posts · 894 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
17 January 2008
Last activity
21 January 2008
Original author
Nuxx Bar
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
894
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In his consistent advocation of the persecution of motorists, it is
    ironic that Spindrift does far more damage to the cycling movement
    than he does to the motoring lobby. Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. It is even alleged that he doesn't know how to. His
    anti-car obsession is entirely negative and completely irrational. He
    doesn't care about cyclists and he doesn't care about people dying on
    the roads: he just uses those causes as excuses for his nasty,
    spiteful, [censored]-ridden crusade. If you're a cyclist, Spindrift is
    using you for his own purposes, and you don't need to put up with it.

    The way that he conducts himself on forums and newsgroups beggars
    belief. Even many cyclists are utterly fed up with him. His lies,
    liberal use of ad hominem, refusal to answer awkward questions, and
    vitriolic invective are all carefully designed to cover up the gaping
    holes in his arguments. He has a reputation like no other. There are
    currently several pending lawsuits against him, and it is even
    suspected that he is on the run from the police for mailbombing the
    ABD, dangerously vandalising vehicles, and attacking motorists for no
    reason. Despite the risk involved, he still cannot stop himself from
    posting his poison, and abuses Internet cafe facilities in order to do
    this. He is a dangerous individual and should not be approached.

    A leaked email from Spindrift confirms what most of us already knew:
    he knows that the Safe Speed position is correct, and that the
    policies advocated by Paul Smith would save lives unlike speed
    cameras, but he pretends to think otherwise, since such policies do
    not fit in with his anti-car emotions. Thus, he considers the
    persecution of motorists to be more important than the saving of
    lives. We've now had it from the horse's mouth. It is clear from
    this that he is a monster, and cyclists and motorists alike should
    unite against his hateful spoutings and get him off the Internet, and
    out of society, for good. Due to his mental state it is unclear
    whether he would be imprisoned or committed, but either way, he will
    be detained, and offered the help that he so desperately needs.
    Personally I think that being committed would be best; prison would
    facilitate continuation of his multiple drug habits, and it is vital
    for him and everyone else that these addictions are terminated as soon
    as possible. It may even be the case that they were responsible (at
    least in part) for the start of his callous, hurtful campaign.

    Every two-and-a-half hours in this country, a road user needlessly
    dies. Some of these road users are motorists, some are pedestrians,
    and some are cyclists. Some are children. Spindrift doesn't care
    about any of these deaths, in fact he actively and knowingly
    encourages policies which directly result in them. In many ways he
    might as well be killing these poor, innocent people himself. He
    would have done less damage if he'd murdered five people instead of
    ever posting on the Internet. Incredible but true.

    Spindrift kills cyclists. He isn't one himself. Those of you who
    still support him should instead contribute to the effort to find him
    before he does any more damage, or you or your loved ones could be
    next. It's high time. We need sensible, life-saving road safety
    policies, and to get them, we need Spindrift and his lies to be
    silenced for good.

    Cheers and fives, please, as agreed

    Administrator

  2. "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    "Personally I think that being committed would be best"

    Can't doubt my committment, old boy!

    "In many ways he
    might as well be killing these poor, innocent people himself."

    Poor innocent belgian colour-blind orphans?

    Oh, the shame!

    "He
    would have done less damage if he'd murdered five people instead of
    ever posting on the Internet. Incredible but true. "

    Best suggestion yet, we'll never get a proper democracy in this
    country till we shoot a few people (Alf Garnett).

    Let go nuxxy, chill the flip out dude. Buy a bike. It makes you happy,
    no, really.

    After all, happiness is what you want, surely?


  3. Quoted message said:


    Cheers and fives, please, as agreed

    Administrator

    None of the NG this is posted to have "Administrators"

  4. In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    you accept them?

    --
    MrBitsy

  5. Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:

    "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    Quoted message said:

    News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    you accept them?

    --
    MrBitsy

    Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question please?

  6. marc said:
    Quoted message said:

    Cheers and fives, please, as agreed

    Administrator

    None of the NG this is posted to have "Administrators"

    No [censored] sherlock! 😉

  7. Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    you accept them?

    More likely that you bored him, again.

  8. spindrift said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Who's that in the photo then? Could be anybody!

  9. "broadssailor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    spindrift said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Who's that in the photo then? Could be anybody!

    Yebbut the entire of your usenet stream is a fake, put there by MI5, so it
    makes no difference.

  10. Clive George said:

    "broadssailor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    spindrift said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:

    Who's that in the photo then? Could be anybody!

    Yebbut the entire of your usenet stream is a fake, put there by MI5, so it
    makes no difference.

    LOL!

  11. Nuxx Bar wrote:

    8<...

    Some pillock leave the door to the kindergarten open again...?

    Tim

    --
    Sent from Birmingham, UK... all about me at www.nervouscyclist.org
    'Now some people say that you shouldn't tempt fate, and for them I
    cannot disagree - but I never learned nothing by playing it safe - I
    say fate should not tempt me.' - Mary Chapin Carpenter

  12. In article <b5db02c1-a593-4a6d-a105-e6d77d30abd1
    @n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Not that he cares of course: he
    never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:

    "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    Quoted message said:

    News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    you accept them?

    --
    MrBitsy

    Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question please?

    The thread concerning looking under vehicles, in shop windows and across
    fields. I gave examples where the techniques could be useful but you
    didn't answer one of them.

    --
    MrBitsy

  13. Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <b5db02c1-a593-4a6d-a105-e6d77d30abd1
    @n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > "Not that he cares of course: he
    > never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    > was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    you accept them?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    --
    MrBitsy

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question please?

    The thread concerning looking under vehicles, in shop windows and across
    fields. I gave examples where the techniques could be useful but you
    didn't answer one of them.

    --
    MrBitsy- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    Sorry, yes, you're right, looking in fields and shops can be
    useful.....

    (backs away from thread)

  14. In article <dde709df-884d-45f2-a175-9f4c8de03f86
    @k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <b5db02c1-a593-4a6d-a105-e6d77d30abd1
    @n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    On 17 Jan, 12:48, Raymond Keattch <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    > @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    > > "Not that he cares of course: he
    > > never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:

    > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:

    > > "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    Quoted message said:

    > > News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    > > was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    Quoted message said:

    > I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    > thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    > you accept them?

    Quoted message said:

    > --
    > MrBitsy

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question please?

    The thread concerning looking under vehicles, in shop windows and across
    fields. I gave examples where the techniques could be useful but you
    didn't answer one of them.

    --
    MrBitsy- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    Sorry, yes, you're right, looking in fields and shops can be
    useful.....

    (backs away from thread)

    Great, as soon as you find your wrong, you back away from the thread.
    Pity you didn't learn anything.

    --
    MrBitsy

  15. Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <dde709df-884d-45f2-a175-9f4c8de03f86
    @k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <b5db02c1-a593-4a6d-a105-e6d77d30abd1
    @n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > On 17 Jan, 12:48, Raymond Keattch <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > > In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    > > @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > > "Not that he cares of course: he
    > > > never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > > "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > > News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    > > > was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    > > thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    > > you accept them?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > --
    > > MrBitsy

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question please?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The thread concerning looking under vehicles, in shop windows and across
    fields. I gave examples where the techniques could be useful but you
    didn't answer one of them.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    --
    MrBitsy- Hide quoted text -

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    - Show quoted text -

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, yes, you're right, looking in fields and shops can be
    useful.....

    Quoted message said:

    (backs away from thread)

    Great, as soon as you find your wrong, you back away from the thread.
    Pity you didn't learn anything.

    --
    MrBitsy- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    You're.

    I have no idea what you are talking about, you keep making cryptic
    references to looking in shops, what in the name of left handed Greek
    buggery are you waffling on about you slack-jawed goggle-eyed mouth
    breathing twunt who cries when the nice family wins in Family
    Fortunes?

    Probably.

  16. "spindrift" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <dde709df-884d-45f2-a175-9f4c8de03f86
    @k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    On 17 Jan, 23:30, Raymond Keattch <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > In article <b5db02c1-a593-4a6d-a105-e6d77d30abd1
    > @n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    > > On 17 Jan, 12:48, Raymond Keattch <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > > > In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    > > > @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    > > > > "Not that he cares of course: he
    > > > > never cycles. "

    Quoted message said:

    > > > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    Quoted message said:

    > > > > "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    Quoted message said:

    > > > > News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but
    > > > > luckily it
    > > > > was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day,
    > > > > yum!

    Quoted message said:

    > > > I gave you several examples of good observational technique in
    > > > another
    > > > thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence
    > > > means
    > > > you accept them?

    Quoted message said:

    > > > --
    > > > MrBitsy

    Quoted message said:

    > > Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question
    > > please?

    Quoted message said:

    > The thread concerning looking under vehicles, in shop windows and
    > across
    > fields. I gave examples where the techniques could be useful but you
    > didn't answer one of them.

    Quoted message said:

    > --
    > MrBitsy- Hide quoted text -

    Quoted message said:

    > - Show quoted text -

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry, yes, you're right, looking in fields and shops can be
    useful.....

    Quoted message said:

    (backs away from thread)

    Great, as soon as you find your wrong, you back away from the thread.
    Pity you didn't learn anything.

    --
    MrBitsy- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    You're.

    I have no idea what you are talking about, you keep making cryptic
    references to looking in shops, what in the name of left handed Greek
    buggery are you waffling on about you slack-jawed goggle-eyed mouth
    breathing twunt who cries when the nice family wins in Family
    Fortunes?

    I suggest you buy a copy of Roadcraft. All then will become clear.

  17. Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <b5db02c1-a593-4a6d-a105-e6d77d30abd1
    @n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Raymond Keattch said:

    In article <5c0415b2-d045-41e4-8e5a-3fca8cfa2410
    @q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [email hidden] says...

    > "Not that he cares of course: he
    > never cycles. "

    >http://www.flickr.com/photos/12900040@N05/1343048642/

    > "are currently several pending lawsuits against him,"

    > News to me. Some Triads took out a contract against me but luckily it
    > was a catering contract so I get Dim Sum delivered twice a day, yum!

    I gave you several examples of good observational technique in another
    thread, that you never bothered to answer. I take it the silence means
    you accept them?

    --
    MrBitsy

    Sorry I missed your post old darling, what was your question please?

    The thread concerning looking under vehicles, in shop windows and across
    fields. I gave examples where the techniques could be useful but you
    didn't answer one of them.

    Erm, Ray, I rather think that was the other idiot...

    --

    Ian D

  18. This thread's full of surprises, I never knew injunctions could be
    served without the recipient knowing, and I'm intrigued by the
    mysterious email referred to in the OP that claims an email from me
    validates Small Pith's "research". Smith was a liar, a charlatan and
    a fraud who cowardly avoided awkward questions and ran away when
    challenged. He would then dispatch his trained monkeys to carry out
    creepy internet stalking campaigns that allege mental illness and drug
    addiction. Hello nuxxy!!! Way to go with mature debate spunky!!

    Maybe I'm confused with the poster who looks in fields and shops,
    whatever that's about.

    Maybe I'm confused with the person who looks in fields and shops?

  19. "spindrift" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Smith ... cowardly avoided awkward questions and ran away when


    challenged.<<

    Oh the irony of it.

    Calum

  20. calum' cpmATe-mile.co.uk said:

    "spindrift" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Smith ... cowardly avoided awkward questions and ran away when

    challenged.<<

    Oh the irony of it.

    Calum

    Calum, you seem to feel that my blaming the driver for smashing into
    Jason and killing him was premature. Leaving aside the fact that the
    driver has now been reported for prosecution, here's your chance to
    demonstrate the rightness which is clearly so important to you.

    We know that drivers take admit taking absurd around cyclists:

    As the report 'Sharing Road Space: drivers and cyclists as equal road
    users' published by the Scottish Executive in 2001 notes:

    'As was the case with advanced stop lines, some drivers felt that
    "pinch points" also provided an opportunity to "race" with cyclists.
    Although other drivers claimed that they showed courtesy and
    consideration towards cyclists in that they allowed the cyclists to
    precede them through the "pinch points", cyclists stated that drivers
    would frequently speed through in front of them from either direction,
    with a possible risk of collision or accident.'

    http://www.thebikezone.org.uk/thebikezone/campaigning/pinchpoints.html

    We also know that killer drivers generally receive a fine or a brief
    ban- cases cited ibid.

    We also know from reports and from first-hand knowledge of Jason that
    he was a cautious, experienced and professional cyclist unlikely to do
    anything risky.

    Now, I made the point that drivers routinely behave in an idiotic way
    and kill and cripple with almost total impunity, the fine often being
    less than the cost of the bike.

    Given the above I'd have thought linking idiotic driver behaviour to
    jason's death was appropriate, especially given that two seperate
    reports blamed the vehicle driver's behaviour for the crash.

    If you disagree then feel free to place a wager the driver isn't
    charged with anything- the stake going to the memorial fund, if you
    like.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.