Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Spesh Hardrock Womens

Started by Coyoteboy · · Last activity · 7 posts · 405 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
26 January 2005
Last activity
31 January 2005
Original author
Coyoteboy
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
405
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anyone actually own one of these? The GF is looking for one and last
    time rode my old XC which was too big for her. By far. I'm 6'1 and she
    is 5'4. Looking at the spesh hardrock frame i spotted they do a womens
    specific bike. Gimmick? Its pretty hard to test ride bikes where i am -
    most shops stock either £2K bikes or £50 bikes, and wont let you take
    them for testers anywhere other than in the shop showroom lol.

    J

  2. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    Anyone actually own one of these? The GF is looking for one and last
    time rode my old XC which was too big for her. By far. I'm 6'1 and she
    is 5'4. Looking at the spesh hardrock frame i spotted they do a womens
    specific bike. Gimmick? Its pretty hard to test ride bikes where i am -
    most shops stock either £2K bikes or £50 bikes, and wont let you take
    them for testers anywhere other than in the shop showroom lol.
    -----------------------------

    See if you can put a cash deposit down on the checkout counter for the test
    ride in the parking lot. I'm sure they won't disagree on that one.

    The main differences are the following:
    Smaller frame
    Different saddle
    Shorter stem
    Wonky paint job
    Possibly shorter cranks (165mm maybe)

    She sounds like just the right size for the majority of the women's bikes.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  3. Coyoteboy said:

    Anyone actually own one of these? The GF is looking for one and last
    time rode my old XC which was too big for her. By far. I'm 6'1 and she
    is 5'4. Looking at the spesh hardrock frame i spotted they do a womens
    specific bike. Gimmick? Its pretty hard to test ride bikes where i am
    - most shops stock either £2K bikes or £50 bikes, and wont let you
    take them for testers anywhere other than in the shop showroom lol.

    J

    Read my commenst on WSD here. It's great if it's the right fit, BUT they
    are designed for a very specific set of proportions. Only. There are many
    women out there who do not need WSD to get a good fit. In addition, the
    component sets are limited if you stick to WSD. Sure it's great if it works,
    there are some women who have found the right bike that is WSD, but there
    are plenty of us out there who think it's a marketing ploy.
    http://www.specialtyoutdoors.com/penny/biking/ridetips.asp

    the squid said:

    The main differences are the following:
    Smaller frame
    Different saddle
    Shorter stem
    Wonky paint job
    Possibly shorter cranks (165mm maybe)

    Phil's on the right track but there is a lot more to a WSD bike than a
    smaller frame. They are designed specifically for short toso, long legged
    women. Which is great if that's your body proportions... but that's only
    some women, not all.

    I suggest looking at overall good fitting bikes, and not just WSD bikes.

    Penny

  4. "small change" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Coyoteboy said:

    Anyone actually own one of these? The GF is looking for one and last
    time rode my old XC which was too big for her. By far. I'm 6'1 and she
    is 5'4. Looking at the spesh hardrock frame i spotted they do a womens
    specific bike. Gimmick? Its pretty hard to test ride bikes where i am
    - most shops stock either £2K bikes or £50 bikes, and wont let you
    take them for testers anywhere other than in the shop showroom lol.

    J

    Read my commenst on WSD here. It's great if it's the right fit, BUT they
    are designed for a very specific set of proportions. Only. There are many
    women out there who do not need WSD to get a good fit. In addition, the
    component sets are limited if you stick to WSD. Sure it's great if it
    works,
    there are some women who have found the right bike that is WSD, but there
    are plenty of us out there who think it's a marketing ploy.
    http://www.specialtyoutdoors.com/penny/biking/ridetips.asp

    the squid said:

    The main differences are the following:
    Smaller frame
    Different saddle
    Shorter stem
    Wonky paint job
    Possibly shorter cranks (165mm maybe)

    Phil's on the right track but there is a lot more to a WSD bike than a
    smaller frame. They are designed specifically for short toso, long legged
    women. Which is great if that's your body proportions... but that's only
    some women, not all.

    I suggest looking at overall good fitting bikes, and not just WSD bikes.

    FWIW, my roommate's girlfriend is riding a 19" regular Rockhopper, and it
    seems to fit her just fine. She's also a lot of leg and medium torso and
    5'10". She's happy with it.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  5. Thanks for the comments (and the link, Penny) much appreciated. I'll be
    taking her out and about to try some out - she doesnt really fit the
    WSD philosophy of long legs short body - shes more or less evenly
    proportioned so i think it must be a case of trying all and seeing what
    fits.

    Thanks again,
    James

  6. Coyoteboy said:

    Thanks for the comments (and the link, Penny) much appreciated. I'll
    be taking her out and about to try some out - she doesnt really fit
    the WSD philosophy of long legs short body - shes more or less evenly
    proportioned so i think it must be a case of trying all and seeing
    what fits.

    Thanks again,
    James

    I ride a standard 15" Kona FS, I'm 5-3, balanced proportions.

    Penny

  7. ok, ta.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.