Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Specializzed Tarmac WHOA!

Started by David · · Last activity · 12 posts · 893 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 April 2004
Last activity
16 April 2004
Original author
David
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
893
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and someone road one
    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what a wierd looking
    bike. Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?
    cyclingnews.comtech.php

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    david said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and
    someone road one in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him
    but dang, what a wierd looking bike. Are there any
    inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike besides
    the additional joins which could fail?

    cyclingnews.comtech.php
    s/aug15news/sp ec_tarmacfull

    Yes. The inherent advantage is that it looks nifty, which
    causes increased sales. As we speak, this inherent advantage
    is working on me (but alas, like trying to scoop 2 gallons
    of ice cream out of a gallon pail, it is not working on my
    wallet). Specialized is said to be very excited about this
    advantage.

    Would like to know what "curvecious" means,
    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden]
    sfu.cawiredcola President, Fabrizio
    Mazzoleni Fan Club

  3. Quoted message said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and
    someone road one in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him
    but dang, what a wierd looking bike. Are there any
    inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike besides
    the additional joins which could fail? cycling-cycling-
    news.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec-
    _ta rmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

    What extra "joins"? It's just another bike with curved tubes
    instead of straight. Nothing new or amazing.

    --
    Ted Bennett Portland OR

  4. david said:



    cyclingnews.comtech.php
    s/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    Bill "Mr. Bikewell" S.

  5. S o r n i said:
    david said:


    cyclingnews.comtech.php
    ews/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    It looks like a warped "compact geometry" frame.

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad Cities (Illinois Side)

  6. "Ted Bennett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today,
    and someone road


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what
    a wierd looking bike. Are there any inherent advantages
    or disadvantages to this bike besides the additional
    joins which could fail?


    cyclingnews.comtech.php
    s/aug15news/spec_ta

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    rmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

    What extra "joins"? It's just another bike with curved
    tubes instead of straight. Nothing new or amazing.

    Somehow the "t" went missing. So it meant to read, inherent
    problems with the joints. The joints between the carbon top
    and TI/aluminum bottom.

    David

  7. Ted Bennett said:


    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today,
    and someone road one in, I didn't get a chance to talk to
    him but dang, what a wierd looking bike. Are there any
    inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike besides
    the additional joins which could fail? cyclin-cyclin-
    gnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/sp-
    ec_ta rmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

    What extra "joins"? It's just another bike with curved
    tubes instead of straight. Nothing new or amazing.

    I think he means all the carbon to aluminium joints.

    Anyway, it's not working for me, I want a Roubaix Pro

    specialized.com04RoubaixPro
    Frameset_d.jpg

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts Your
    milage may vary

  8. Tom Sherman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    S o r n i said:
    david said:


    cyclingnews.comtech.php
    /news/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    It looks like a warped "compact geometry" frame.

    Oooh, sweet, the compact geometry war is about to be
    re-animated!

    App

  9. Looks like the "cruiser" bikes of old days (1950 and back).
    Wanna see wierd with lots of joints, ex Moulton "Mini".

    jimlangley.netamvisit.htm

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear
    for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

  10. Sorry, that should have read Alex Moulton "Mini"!

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear
    for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

  11. S o r n i said:


    cyclingnews.comtech.php
    ews/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    Yeah, even though it borrows a couple of hints from the
    stylish cruiser genre, it mostly maintains the overall
    gimpy and graceless appearance common to most road
    racing bikes. (For what it's worth, they look even
    gimpier and more graceless when topped with a lycra-clad
    geek holding his butt up in the air like some sort of
    estrus-stricken animal.)

    No worries, though; there are plenty of nice-looking bikes
    being manufactured currently, like these examples:

    nirve.comlargepic.asp konaworl-konaworl-
    d.com/2k4bikes/images/low/2K4_BikeHotRod_650.jpg ww-ww-
    w.electrabike.com/04/images/sr_section/large/6_1_REVIL3_M_-
    RED.jpg 3gbikes.comshow tim
    e_left.html

    Chalo Colina

  12. gte-<< Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to
    this bike besides the additional joins which could fail? ht-
    tp://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/-
    aug15news/spe c_tarmacfull >><BR><BR>

    Yikes, design run amok.....Like a guy at interbike once said
    to me when I asked what it was for...'it's for sellin'......

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.