Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Specializzed Tarmac WHOA!

Started by david · · Last activity · 13 posts · 730 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 April 2004
Last activity
16 April 2004
Original author
david
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
730
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and someone road one
    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what a wierd looking
    bike. Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    david said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and someone road one
    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what a wierd looking
    bike. Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/sp
    ec_tarmacfull

    Yes. The inherent advantage is that it looks nifty, which causes
    increased sales. As we speak, this inherent advantage is working on me
    (but alas, like trying to scoop 2 gallons of ice cream out of a gallon
    pail, it is not working on my wallet). Specialized is said to be very
    excited about this advantage.

    Would like to know what "curvecious" means,
    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/
    President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  3. S o r n i said:
    david said:


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    It looks like a warped "compact geometry" frame.

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad Cities (Illinois Side)


  4. Quoted message said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and someone road one
    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what a wierd looking
    bike. Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_ta
    rmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

    What extra "joins"? It's just another bike with curved tubes instead of
    straight. Nothing new or amazing.

    --
    Ted Bennett
    Portland OR

  5. david said:



    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    Bill "Mr. Bikewell" S.

  6. "Ted Bennett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and someone road


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what a wierd looking
    bike. Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_ta

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    rmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

    What extra "joins"? It's just another bike with curved tubes instead of
    straight. Nothing new or amazing.

    Somehow the "t" went missing. So it meant to read, inherent problems with
    the joints. The joints between the carbon top and TI/aluminum bottom.

    David

  7. Ted Bennett said:


    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone seen this thing? I went into the LBS today, and someone road one
    in, I didn't get a chance to talk to him but dang, what a wierd looking
    bike. Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_ta
    rmacfull

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    David

    What extra "joins"? It's just another bike with curved tubes instead of
    straight. Nothing new or amazing.

    I think he means all the carbon to aluminium joints.

    Anyway, it's not working for me, I want a Roubaix Pro

    http://www.specialized.com/OA_MEDIA/2004/bikes/04RoubaixProFrameset_d.jpg

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  8. Tom Sherman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    S o r n i said:
    david said:


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    It looks like a warped "compact geometry" frame.

    Oooh, sweet, the compact geometry war is about to be re-animated!

    App

  9. Looks like the "cruiser" bikes of old days (1950 and back). Wanna see
    wierd with lots of joints, ex Moulton "Mini".

    http://www.jimlangley.net/ride/amvisit.htm

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back.
    And a really low gear for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner
    http://www.geocities.com/czcorner

  10. Sorry, that should have read Alex Moulton "Mini"!

    - -

    "May you have the wind at your back.
    And a really low gear for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner
    http://www.geocities.com/czcorner

  11. S o r n i said:


    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spec_tarmacfull

    Sorry, but that's butt-ugly IMO.

    Yeah, even though it borrows a couple of hints from the stylish
    cruiser genre, it mostly maintains the overall gimpy and graceless
    appearance common to most road racing bikes. (For what it's worth,
    they look even gimpier and more graceless when topped with a
    lycra-clad geek holding his butt up in the air like some sort of
    estrus-stricken animal.)

    No worries, though; there are plenty of nice-looking bikes being
    manufactured currently, like these examples:

    http://nirve.com/main/largepic.asp?id=1476
    http://konaworld.com/2k4bikes/images/low/2K4_BikeHotRod_650.jpg
    http://www.electrabike.com/04/images/sr_section/large/6_1_REVIL3_M_RED.jpg
    http://3gbikes.com/bikes/classic_choppers/show_time_left.html

    Chalo Colina

  12. gte-<< Are there any inherent advantages or disadvantages to this bike
    besides the additional joins which could fail?
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2003/tech/news/aug15news/spe
    c_tarmacfull >><BR><BR>

    Yikes, design run amok.....Like a guy at interbike once said to me when I asked
    what it was for...'it's for sellin'......

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  13. maybe it's a suspension type top tube, like the merlin newsboy.....sproing....

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.