Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Spam and Newsgroups Question

Started by Tom Nakashima · · Last activity · 12 posts · 784 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
22 April 2004
Last activity
24 April 2004
Original author
Tom Nakashima
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
784
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?
    -tom

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?

    Absolutely, every Usenet article is scanned by harvesters for addresses.
    It's just like putting your email address on a public web page.

    --Paul

  3. Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail"
    than ones who don't use the newsgroups?

    I'd guess that the ones who use their valid e-mail addresses do -- and so
    probably do those who fudge 'em with common things like "nospam" or
    whatever.

    Then again, I know quite a few people who get TONS of spam daily, and do
    /not/ read newsgroups at all (AFAIK).

    Bill "no help whatsoever" S.

  4. Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who do

    If you use your real address you will.

    I like using www.spamgourmet.com. They will forward a specified # of emails
    to you, keeping your real email hidden.

    www.mailinator.com is very handy for sites that require email for sign-up.
    You can create [email hidden] then go check it, it lasts
    for just a few hours.

    With the tools that are available now, you can keep certain addresses very
    private now.

  5. sittingduck said:
    Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail"
    than ones who do

    If you use your real address you will.

    I like using www.spamgourmet.com. They will forward a specified # of
    emails to you, keeping your real email hidden.

    www.mailinator.com is very handy for sites that require email for
    sign-up. You can create [email hidden] then go
    check it, it lasts for just a few hours.

    With the tools that are available now, you can keep certain addresses
    very private now.

    Even if you dont' keep it that private, spam even through hotmail is pretty
    good. They seem to have gotten the spam filters pretty well and have
    filtered out (correctly) nearly all my spam. I receive about one or two
    spams per week.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  6. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?

    Only if they put their email addresses in postings.

    --
    PeteCresswell

  7. On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:24:42 -0700, "Tom Nakashima"

    may have said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?

    Yes, generally.

    More information here:

    http://tinyurl.com/25xxz

    original URL:

    http:[email hidden]&lr=&hl=en

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  8. Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?

    Of course. When I changed ISPs recently I set up 7 accounts, the only one
    that is receiving spam is my Usenet account which is this one. I don't
    like obsfucating my address so I'll just use temp ones if the spam gets to
    be too much.

    Greg

  9. Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?

    Counterintuitively, the address I use [unmunged] for posting to
    these newsfroups gets less spam than other addresses. It does,
    however, get a lot more viruses, worms, and other malicious code.
    --
    Rick Onanian

  10. On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:37:47 -0400, Rick Onanian <[email hidden]>

    may have said:
    Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?

    Counterintuitively, the address I use [unmunged] for posting to
    these newsfroups gets less spam than other addresses. It does,
    however, get a lot more viruses, worms, and other malicious code.

    I believe that you commented once that the spammers may be removing
    the "spam" from the string on the mistaken assumption that it's a
    munging inclusion. The Swen worm, on the other hand, harvests and
    pounds blindly at any address it finds in Usenet headers.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  11. Tom Nakashima said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail" than ones
    who don't use the newsgroups?
    -tom


    Lots - hence the Yahoo! address which is pretty well spamtrapped,
    although it does work, honest. As for the pseudonym - that's just to
    protect myself from future employers etc.

  12. Quoted message said:

    Anyone know if people who use the newsgroups get more "spam mail"
    than ones who don't use the newsgroups?

    There seems to be plenty of evidence showing that to be the case, which
    is why I munge my e-mail address [to foil automated spambots], which has
    the added bonus of eliminating e-mail from those n00bs who are too
    clueless to figure it out.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.