Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Sorry, can't resist it

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 9 posts · 498 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 February 2008
Last activity
14 February 2008
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
498
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.google.com/patents?id=5LZVAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=604372&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  2. Quoted message said:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=5LZVAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=604372&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1

    Pretty. Not something to look forward to re-lacing though...

    --
    Linux Registered User # 302622
    <http://counter.li.org>

  3. Quoted message said:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=5LZVAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=604372&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    The improved version:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=cwJ2AAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=641085&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  4. [email hidden said:

    "]http://www.google.com/patents?id=5LZVAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=604372&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Intriguing, but wouldn't those nice curves between the innermost cross and the hub simply disappear as soon as tension was applied to the spokes?(not that there is anything wrong with desiring a double tied 4X pattern..)
    Shouldn't, at the very least, the ties be angled towards the hub instead? That would after all provide some amount of force that would work to retain the curves.
    Or are there slots/furrows in the hub that locks the spokes to an initial radial angle? Or were the spokes simply expected to be made pre-bent out of the ultra strong material unobtanium?

  5. dabac said:


    Quoted message said:

    http://tinyurl.com/22ws8j

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Intriguing, but wouldn't those nice curves between the innermost cross
    and the hub simply disappear as soon as tension was applied to the
    spokes?(not that there is anything wrong with desiring a double tied 4X
    pattern..)
    Shouldn't, at the very least, the ties be angled towards the hub
    instead? That would after all provide some amount of force that would
    work to retain the curves.
    Or are there slots/furrows in the hub that locks the spokes to an
    initial radial angle? Or were the spokes simply expected to be made
    pre-bent out of the ultra strong material unobtanium?

    Dear D,

    I wouldn't dare to try to predict what that thing would do if it were
    to spread beyond New Zealand and fetch up on our shores.

    If you read through the text of the patent, you'll find that it
    mentions a leather tire.

    Leather tires were last heard of in 1879, when Thomas Sparrow
    explained the advantage of his leathered tires in the lower right
    corner of this page of "The English Mechanic":

    " . . . they [leather tires] prevent the slipping of bicycle wheels on
    greasy roads when wet. Ten years ago when I originated the use of
    rubber tires on bicycles [modest devil!] it was found that they could
    not be used in certain often-occurring states of the roads in London;
    perhaps about sixty-five days is the average in the year that a
    bicycle can be ridden safely on London roads with only a rubber tire,
    but with the leather tire added a bicycle may be ridden every day in
    the 365 with safety."
    http://tinyurl.com/2veztt

    Since then, London roads must have become much less greasy, possibly
    due to spelling the word "tyres".

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  6. John Tserkezis said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=5LZVAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=604372&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=0_1

    Pretty. Not something to look forward to re-lacing though...

    Dear John,

    Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder.

    As you suggest, putting that thing together might be a bit tricky.

    SpokeCalc would probably start using imaginary numbers to find spokes
    of the right length.

    But it does show a touching faith in the power of lashing spokes
    together where they cross.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  7. Quoted message said:


    But it does show a touching faith in the power of lashing spokes
    together where they cross.

    I think you'd need to do it like alloy "wire wheels" - where the
    spokes are actually forged alloy. It would look awfully nice on a bike
    with vintage lug work.

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    The improved version:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=cwJ2AAAAEBAJ&pg=PP1&dq=641085&source=gbs_sele
    cted_pages&cad=0_1

    Looks like the end result of sex to me. Or Medusa. Or sex with Medusa.

    Dan

  9. patents as foundation material to float a fraudulent financing scheme?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.