Response to Simon Brooke:
Quoted message said:I'm
also interested to see how Rowling manages to pull off her cyclical
narrative in book seven, given the consequences of plot developments in
book six.
Book six certainly left a lot of loose ends to tie up, and I found it
unsatisfactory for that reason. Plenty of other reasons as well, some of
which have been mentioned. Not well-written, but then none of the canon
have been well-written, IMO. Good Read, though.
(I remember - long after the hype began - when I started reading the
first book, thinking "this is not much more than Jennings and Darbishire
with broomsticks"; but I was wrong even at the time, and it has developed
a great deal since then.)
A mate of mine who occasionally buys first editions of new novels bought
a first-pressing, extra-virgin copy of the first Rowling when it came
out, because he thought it looked interesting: he's never opened it, has
it in an archival bag, and intends to sell it one day to put his - still
hypothetical - kids through school; but I suspect that Rowling will not
last, and he'll have to be careful to hit the top of the market.
Quoted message said:Swallows and Amazons may look like a cheerful adventure
yarn for kids, but, like Harry Potter, it is a very carefully and
skillfully crafted narrative
I always thought that We Didn't Mean To Go To Sea was the best of that
canon, but I haven't read them for about twenty years. Time to take
another look, but I've just collected my copies of "Dance To The Music Of
Time" from my dad's house, so I've already got enough re-reading to do!
--
Mark, UK
"We never do anything well until we cease to think about the manner of
doing it."