Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Something is Wrong...

Started by Wayne666 · · Last activity · 29 posts · 3,496 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
26 March 2008
Last activity
27 March 2008
Original author
Wayne666
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,496
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–29 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. helmutRoole2 said:

    Where did Booned start is professional career? I mean, where in earnest?

    I was going to snitch from here but perhaps the link is better.

    en.wikipedia.orgTom Boonen

    Unless you knew he started at USPS in 2002 and you were just asking a rhetorical question... 🙄

  2. NJK said:

    Something else is wrong or very confusing. N.Axelsson won again for serramenti. This is a rider who was in the last group of a giro mountain stage aaaround 2000. failed a test for EPO, then rides fairly average for a few yrs and now wins. Other older riders on the team are going well. 🙄

    Well the other way to look at it is that he's been clean for the past few years and therefore mediocre against the dopers, but is now "re-emerging" as the peloton starts to clean up and comes back to earth.

    God this is getting confusing.

  3. Crankyfeet said:

    Perhaps he can only focus his juiced-up peak on a 1- 1.5 month cycle.. and he was so miffed at the criticism he got for his efforts in the 2006 TdF that last year he decided to focus on that race (didn't do too bad in it as I recall). And now he's again focussed on that race for 2008. It probably is too difficult for these guys to play around with chemicals the whole season. But I'm just speculating of course.


    Lefevre is like Riis. He took his team off the sauce because he saw the way the wind was blowing. The riders are now left to their own devices, and they have to do it secret and, perhaps, even in moderation. No longer can a team afford to have a huge scandal.

  4. whiteboytrash said:

    Niklas Axelsson’s career looked dead in the water when he tested positive for EPO at the 2001 world cycling championships. He admitted his guilt and was later banned for four years by the Swedish cycling federation.

    The 35-year-old then mounted a comeback in 2004, but was stricken with testicular cancer in 2007 only to reappear yet again with Serramenti PVC Diquigiovanni-Androni Giocattoli this season.

    Persistence paid off Wednesday when he won the 175.6km second stage of the Settimana Internazionale Coppi e Bartali in Italy.m second stage of the Settimana Internazionale Coppi e Bartali in Italy.

    ____

    Wow didn't know this...... I guess he didn't it the wrong way around.... aren't you supposed to get testicular cancer first then take EPO for the rest of your career and win ?

    As lim said he rode a strong Tirreno. Today he dominated the second stage of Coppi e Bartali. First he attacked out of a group of 25 and 11 riders could follow him (Evans, Garzelli and others). Than he attacked again out of the group of 12 and no-one was able to follow.

  5. cyclingheroes said:

    As lim said he rode a strong Tirreno. Today he dominated the second stage of Coppi e Bartali. First he attacked out of a group of 25 and 11 riders could follow him (Evans, Garzelli and others). Than he attacked again out of the group of 12 and no-one was able to follow.

    I think he's got his T/E ratio artificially managed at 3.9 as I'm speculating his natural production is zero atm. It would be interesting if UCI opened up their books on drug test results or the passport. That would explain why he is so strong.

    I wouldn't be unhappy if someone slapped this hypothesis down with some contradictory fact though.

  6. Crankyfeet said:

    I think he's got his T/E ratio artificially managed at 3.9 as I'm speculating his natural production is zero atm. It would be interesting if UCI opened up their books on drug test results or the passport. That would explain why he is so strong.

    I wouldn't be unhappy if someone slapped this hypothesis down with some contradictory fact though.

    You don't need to take testosterone if only one ball is hacked off. The one remaining produces more than enough natural testosterone.

  7. Bro Deal said:

    You don't need to take testosterone if only one ball is hacked off. The one remaining produces more than enough natural testosterone.


    Let's ask Ashley...or Matt...:p

  8. Bro Deal said:

    You don't need to take testosterone if only one ball is hacked off. The one remaining produces more than enough natural testosterone.

    Thanks for that. I didn't realise he still had one left.

  9. Crankyfeet said:

    Thanks for that. I didn't realise he still had one left.


    not yet Tour de Eunuch

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.