Something for modest triatheletes....

"Shabby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.wholesomewear.com/

It highlights the face, rather than the body..

--
Shabby

"Our WaterWear is the first (line) to be introduced because the need for
modesty in swimwear is greatest .. "

Are these people offended by other lines of swimwear?

"Shabby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.wholesomewear.com/

It highlights the face, rather than the body..

--
Shabby

jeez, check out the 'slimming swimwear' range
surely thats gunna puff out like a parachute once you're in the water

Quick, cover the table legs, lest more sensitive morals are offended!

cfsmtb said:

Quick, cover the table legs, lest more sensitive morals are offended!

--
cfsmtb

Hey, I only just picked up some morals last week (closing down sale),
what are these "sensitive" ones of which you speak?

Tam

"Shabby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.wholesomewear.com/

It highlights the face, rather than the body..

Sad, very sad.

I've never understood why exposure of legs, bums, genitals, arms, ankles, or
any other parts of the body is considered immodest/indecent/offensive. I
mean, we've all got (much) the same bits, despite them having different
shapes.

Tony F

And for the not so modest.

Possibly NSFW!

http://www.vizeau.com/d11.htm

"PiledHigher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

And for the not so modest.

Possibly NSFW!

http://www.vizeau.com/d11.htm

That's potentially nasty. I mean, they show them on models, but not on the
obese 53 year old sunlover fresh out of the caravan saying "Don't be silly
Susan, this is fashionable now. Pass me my hat and sandals."

tony f said:

Sad, very sad.

I've never understood why exposure of legs, bums, genitals, arms, ankles, or
any other parts of the body is considered immodest/indecent/offensive. I
mean, we've all got (much) the same bits, despite them having different
shapes.

Tony F

Despite the fact I cover up (due to pale skin) I find this wowser attitude really tragic. Either we're gotta conform to a unnatural ideal or we're pig ugly by societies norms. Time for an a.b nuddie ride? Or maybe not... 😄

PiledHigher said:

And for the not so modest.

Possibly NSFW!

http://www.vizeau.com/d11.htm

Ooooo, that was pleasing to the eye.

Not NSFW either
http://wickedweasel.com/

PiledHigher said:

And for the not so modest.

Possibly NSFW!

http://www.vizeau.com/d11.htm

Do they have a "dress-right" version.

DaveB

"Shabby" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.wholesomewear.com/

It highlights the face, rather than the body..

I think Nana is going to be [censored] when she finds out the kids have knicked
off to the beach to go swimming in her dresses.

DaveB said:

Do they have a "dress-right" version.

DaveB

Now, I've been rather intently studying that image, and from a Ladies Perspective, there's some very wrong with that young chap's perineum. Maybe a doctor would agree? :eek:

Shabby said:

wholesomewear.comwholesomewear.comOpen ↗

It highlights the face, rather than the body..

Is this a front for Hillsong??? 🙄

off to look at that wicckedweasel now 😉

flyingdutch said:

Is this a front for Hillsong??? 🙄

off to look at that wicckedweasel now 😉

It was linked on: [font=Arial]www.duggarfamily.com[/font]

flyingdutch said:

Is this a front for Hillsong??? 🙄

off to look at that wicckedweasel now 😉

It was linked on: [font=Arial]www.duggarfamily.com[/font]

some good advice for a wholesome family man like yourself......

DaveB said:

PiledHigher said:

And for the not so modest.

Possibly NSFW!

http://www.vizeau.com/d11.htm

Do they have a "dress-right" version.

DaveB

Yeah, you put them on inside out if you "dress to the left"...
;-)

Nasty...

--
BrettS

"cfsmtb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

tony f said:

Sad, very sad.

I've never understood why exposure of legs, bums, genitals, arms,
ankles, or
any other parts of the body is considered immodest/indecent/offensive.
I
mean, we've all got (much) the same bits, despite them having
different
shapes.

Tony F

Despite the fact I cover up (due to pale skin) I find this wowser
attitude really tragic. Either we're gotta conform to a unnatural ideal
or we're pig ugly by societies norms. Time for an a.b nuddie ride? Or
maybe not... 😄

hehe - I've been asked not to do a nudie ride again. Ever.... ;^)

Tony F

ANd then there is this (with matching helmet!)

flickr.com63757969Open ↗

Shabby said:

http://www.wholesomewear.com/

It highlights the face, rather than the body..

Ahhh that heading nearly caught me out. We all know there's no such
thing as a modest triathlete. Good joke but April Fools day is long
gone, try again next year.

Marty