Pendejo said:I've followed bike racing for years, but I still don't understand the concept of "chasing down the break." For example, let's say the team leader is in the peloton and a contender from another team gets away on a break. So then strategy will usually dictate that one of the supporting riders on the first team chase down the break, to protect his leader.
But how does a supporting rider who bridges the gap and gets into the breakaway help anything?
If a supporting rider chases down and catches a break, he is supposed to just sit on and do no work. Three things could happen as a result, all 3 of which are good for the team and/or team leader:
Possibility #1: the breakaway rider does all the work and gets beaten by the well-rested domestique in the final sprint, which is good for the team.
Possibility #2: the breakaway rider, fearing the result described in #1 above, decides to give it up, he stops working, and the domestique's team leader together with the peloton catches up to him, which is good for the team leader.
Possibility #3: the breakaway rider does all the work, but can't stay away, and the peleton reels him in, which is good for the team leader.
Either way, it's a win-win-win situation for the team and/or team leader.
Chasing breaks burns matches. The team leader can't afford to chase every break because he'll burn too many matches. So standard team strategy is to have a different team-mate chase each early break based on the knowledge of the 3 possible outcomes mentioned above.
Toward the end of the race, when the team-mates have burned all their matches, then it's the leader's turn to chase. But at least he has saved himself for the end of the race when it's really crunch time.
Clear as mud?
Bob