UK and Europe · Public discussion

Some updates

Started by Just zis Guy, you know? · · Last activity · 63 posts · 1,227 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
24 March 2006
Last activity
28 March 2006
Original author
Just zis Guy, you know?
Posts
63
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,227
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 61–63 of 63
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just zis Guy said:

    to http://www.nohelmetlaw.org.uk

    I am happy to have any contributions people feel like sending in.

    Guy, I'd like to see some advice on how to fit a helmet.

    If one has read the evidence and still decides that one's child should
    wear a helmet, it would be reasonable to tell the parent what
    constitutes a good fit. Having seen one of my children face plant over
    the bars and write off one helmet, it was only fit that prevented
    serious injury.

    I frequently adjust poorly fitting helmets that would otherwise offer
    almost no protection

    regards,
    d.
    --
    remove outer garment for reply

  2. daren said:

    If one has read the evidence and still decides that one's child should
    wear a helmet, it would be reasonable to tell the parent what
    constitutes a good fit. Having seen one of my children face plant over
    the bars and write off one helmet, it was only fit that prevented
    serious injury.

    Point Of Order: ITYM "probably fit that possibly prevented a /more/
    serious injury"

    Quoted message said:

    I frequently adjust poorly fitting helmets that would otherwise offer
    almost no protection

    There's poorly fitting helmets and poorly fitted straps. There's not
    very much one can do about the former because helmets are rigid and so
    are skulls. If you just put soft padding to bulk up the inner fit or
    fiddle with a rear cradle not designed to take a crash load then it
    won't be load spreading properly if it all goes TWOTP.

    (and it wouldn't hurt to say that in a "how to make sure they're not
    /completely/ pointless" page.)

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Peter Clinch said:
    daren said:

    If one has read the evidence and still decides that one's child
    should wear a helmet, it would be reasonable to tell the parent what
    constitutes a good fit. Having seen one of my children face plant
    over the bars and write off one helmet, it was only fit that
    prevented serious injury.

    Point Of Order: ITYM "probably fit that possibly prevented a /more/
    serious injury"


    I think he may well have been thinking of strap related injuries rather than
    tarmac related ones. But ICBW, and often am.
    --
    Ambrose

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.