Yes I read it. But they didn't describe what is meant by "testing positive" and for what substance.
And what level. Obviously there were no UCI rules infractions or the riders would have been exposed
like Llorente. Supposedly, the type and level of substances permitted is enough for therapeutic or
medical reasons but not enough for performance enhancement. The article didn't once mention that
those riders testing "positive" were conforming with UCI regulations and if the they had a problem
with the "positives", they should look at the regs and not the riders who were following them.
And then that bit of chauvanism at the end about how only 2 of the teams with positives were French
showed that the teams in France were more concerned about bad press then foreign teams. Not
mentioning that France has stricter controls than other countries so maybe that's why although 27%
of the TdF teams were French (6/22), only 15% of the "positive" teams were
(2/13). Just ask Igor who can't race in France, but can in other places.
Anyway, I think the CPLD has 3 months in which to decide if they want to take action against those
"positives" like they did with Igor.
A+
"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message news:
[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:trg said:Is this an unusually high finish compared to the members of other teams of the festina era who
rode in the 2003 tour? If so, let's do a statistical analysis and I'l write an article for Le
Monde "proving" that the most popular and best loved cyclists in France are doping compared to
their counterparts. Virenque even wrote in his book "Ma Verité" (rough translation- "It's Not
About the Syringe"😉, that he'd dope again if he was sure not to get caught.
Hey, trg, did you read the article in Le Monde from perhaps last Friday or Saturday that said that
there were actually 30 positives during the TdF rather than just one?