Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Some can, some can't

Started by Mike Causer · · Last activity · 10 posts · 429 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
2 June 2004
Last activity
7 June 2004
Original author
Mike Causer
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
429
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This evening I stopped at a pub to wet my throat. Well to be honest I'd
    cycled to the pub for that express purpose. Sitting outside were two
    cyclists with their bikes. Both expressed interest in the Speed Ross,
    as they'd never seen a 'bent close-up before.

    Cyclist One sat on it: he was a touch too large, but turning the pedals
    backwards it looked as if his knees would clear the bars. But even when
    sitting still he looked as if he thought he would fall off/die/wreck the
    bike. After five minutes of sitting there and discussing how to ride it
    he still looked so unhappy I got him off.

    Cyclist Two sat on it: immediately he could balance the Ross with one
    foot on the ground, leaned back and relaxed, so I said "push and go".
    He went, turned a neat circle in the car-park and came back. "Keep
    going" I said, and he took it for a run around the village green, very
    prettily too. Born 'bent rider!

    Cyclist One was riding an Italian frame, hung with enough Campagnolo
    components that I quite believed his statement that there was 2,000
    Pounds Stg there.

    Cyclist Two was riding an Elswick (probably 1960s) rescued from a skip
    (dumpster), with Huret gears -- haven't seen those since I was a kid.

    Cyclist One was in full lycra regalia advertising the local CC and said
    he was the Chairman.

    Cyclist Two was his son (possibly stepson) aged about 15.

    OK, a teenager with decent balance, and the feeling of invulnerability
    that teens have, should just jump on and ride, but I was amazed that
    anyone with a lot of experience should be so nervous of the bike. Maybe
    my description of Audax distances without crotch-chafe might get him to
    try it again though.

    It was around that same village green that I first rode a recumbent
    (thanks to a local Street-Glider owner) , so it's nice to have possibly
    started someone else along the path of righteousness in the same place.

    Mike

  2. "Mike Causer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Cyclist Two was riding an Elswick (probably 1960s) rescued from a skip
    (dumpster), with Huret gears -- haven't seen those since I was a kid.

    You really should stay well away from those unattractive types.

    Sadly, the roads seem to be clogging up with them more and more
    lately.

    One reason to avoid them is that people judge you by who you
    associate with.

    That's why training around Treviso or Valmontone is such a pleasure.

  3. I'm always fascinated by who will or won't try to ride a recumbent. My
    current theory is that a fear of looking silly is a greater barrier (for
    most people) than the physical fear of falling off.

    I know some very cool 'extreme sports' fanatics who I can't persuade to
    tough the thing; the more laid back people never seem to give it a second
    thought. I believe the psychologists classify some people as having
    'novelty-seeking personality types' - I think that helps, too.

    Kit

    Mike Causer said:

    This evening I stopped at a pub to wet my throat. Well to be honest I'd
    cycled to the pub for that express purpose. Sitting outside were two
    cyclists with their bikes. Both expressed interest in the Speed Ross,
    as they'd never seen a 'bent close-up before.

    Cyclist One sat on it: he was a touch too large, but turning the pedals
    backwards it looked as if his knees would clear the bars. But even when
    sitting still he looked as if he thought he would fall off/die/wreck the
    bike. After five minutes of sitting there and discussing how to ride it
    he still looked so unhappy I got him off.

    Cyclist Two sat on it: immediately he could balance the Ross with one
    foot on the ground, leaned back and relaxed, so I said "push and go".
    He went, turned a neat circle in the car-park and came back. "Keep
    going" I said, and he took it for a run around the village green, very
    prettily too. Born 'bent rider!

    Cyclist One was riding an Italian frame, hung with enough Campagnolo
    components that I quite believed his statement that there was 2,000
    Pounds Stg there.

    Cyclist Two was riding an Elswick (probably 1960s) rescued from a skip
    (dumpster), with Huret gears -- haven't seen those since I was a kid.

    Cyclist One was in full lycra regalia advertising the local CC and said
    he was the Chairman.

    Cyclist Two was his son (possibly stepson) aged about 15.

    OK, a teenager with decent balance, and the feeling of invulnerability
    that teens have, should just jump on and ride, but I was amazed that
    anyone with a lot of experience should be so nervous of the bike. Maybe
    my description of Audax distances without crotch-chafe might get him to
    try it again though.

    It was around that same village green that I first rode a recumbent
    (thanks to a local Street-Glider owner) , so it's nice to have possibly
    started someone else along the path of righteousness in the same place.

    Mike

  4. Fabrizio Mazzoleni said:

    "Mike Causer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Cyclist Two was riding an Elswick (probably 1960s) rescued from a skip
    (dumpster), with Huret gears -- haven't seen those since I was a kid.

    You really should stay well away from those unattractive types.

    Sadly, the roads seem to be clogging up with them more and more
    lately.

    One reason to avoid them is that people judge you by who you
    associate with....

    Fabby,

    That is why Zoot Katz [1] drops you every time you cross paths with him
    - no self-respecting practical cyclist wants to be seen with your type. 😉

    [1] Seen near the center of this photograph;
    <http://mypage.direct.ca/i/imnot/pix/dino1_april.jpg>.

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

  5. "Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    That is why Zoot Katz [1] drops you every time you cross paths with him
    - no self-respecting practical cyclist wants to be seen with your type. 😉

    Ah yes, that brings us to ol Zoot. Now there's a real special case.
    He's one of those types that always have 'issues'. He into stuff
    like that critical mass thing.

    Now you won't see people being disrespectful of the bike on the
    streets of Lombardy or Veneto.

  6. Fabrizio Mazzoleni said:

    That's why training around Treviso or Valmontone is such a pleasure.

    It WAS you. The one in the Ninja Turtle MTB shirt and the helmet with
    the turtle head sticking out. Cool fenders, too. Do the mud flaps
    actually work?

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)
    Just someone on two wheels...

  7. kit said:

    I'm always fascinated by who will or won't try to ride a recumbent. My
    current theory is that a fear of looking silly is a greater barrier (for
    most people) than the physical fear of falling off.

    There were several recumbents at the Mt. Airy bike shop I did not feel
    comfortable the first time. Interestingly, while my wife and I both
    prefered the Visions way back when, she had more trouble with the Tour
    Easy and I had - for whatever reason - more trouble with the wheel
    flop of the BikeE. Came back the next month and all were at least OK.
    (I still hated the BikeE, though.)

    Still, whatever its faults, the diamond frame bike is amazingly
    forgiving when it comes to balance issues. My sister had a thyroid
    problem that led to about a year of balance problems, but she could
    ride a bike easily. I don't know that being comfortable on a diamond
    frame means that a person has - necessarily - enough sense of
    balancing (vs. balance) that starting a recumbent for the first time
    requires.

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)
    Just someone on two wheels...

  8. The first time I rode a recumbent [1990] I confidently sat down and
    pushed off after boastfully telling its owner what a very experienced
    bike-rider I was. Moments later, to my great embarassment, I wobbled to
    a halt after squirrelling all over the road like a mad fool. The bike's
    owner then told me in a calm, reassuring voice that I needed to lean
    back, relax, and trust the bike to track a straight line. I took a deep
    breath and followed his advice. He was right: his bike tracked a perfect
    line once I let go my distrust of novelty, and my apprehension of
    failure. I subsequently bought a frameset from him, and have ridden my
    own Tour Easy many thousands of miles; his name is Gardner Martin, and
    I'm grateful to this day for his good advice.

    http://members.cox.net/lioninoil/myte.htm

  9. Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Still, whatever its faults, the diamond frame bike is amazingly
    forgiving when it comes to balance issues. My sister had a thyroid
    problem that led to about a year of balance problems, but she could
    ride a bike easily. I don't know that being comfortable on a diamond
    frame means that a person has - necessarily - enough sense of
    balancing (vs. balance) that starting a recumbent for the first time
    requires.

    I am guessing your sister knew how to ride a bike before she developed
    the problems. Had she not known how to ride either type of bike
    before hand, I could not predict if she would be able to more easily
    learn to ride a conventional, a recumbent like an EZ-1, or neither.

    (Re Lion's comments) Some of the _worst_ first-time 'benters I have
    ever seen are '"very experienced cyclists". Their wiring is wrong.
    Someone with less bike wiring seems to get wired right for a recumbent
    more quickly.

    All that said, the higher the CG, the lower the wobble frequency, so
    on some level, the easier it is to balance. When "safety bicycles"
    first came out, the big wheel crowd thought they were too low and
    unstable, Thus, the giraffe safety.

    John Riley

  10. On 4 Jun 2004 04:40:11 -0700, [email hidden] (john riley)

    Quoted message said:

    I am guessing your sister knew how to ride a bike before she developed
    the problems. Had she not known how to ride either type of bike
    before hand, I could not predict if she would be able to more easily
    learn to ride a conventional, a recumbent like an EZ-1, or neither.

    Well, she didn't ride much before. She started riding more because it
    was easier in many ways than simple walking.

    She recovered and AFAIK the bike is now rusting away, forgotten.

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)
    Just someone on two wheels...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.