Tailwind announced yesterday that Schilling would be going
to court in London today, seeking injunctive relief. Does
anyone know if they went to court and if so, what the
result was?
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Solicitors Result In Court?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 15 June 2004
- Last activity
- 19 June 2004
- Original author
- B. Lafferty
- Posts
- 10
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 430
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
No results yet, here is the court brief from LA
LEGAL NOTICE RE: LANCE ARMSTRONG - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Lance Armstrong has reacted with concern and dismay at the
false allegations made by David Walsh, Chief Sports Writer
of the Sunday Times. The allegations appear in a forthcoming
book entitled 'LA Confidential', co-written with Pierre
Ballester and to be published in France. Extracts from the
book have appeared in L'Express and some of the book's
allegations were repeated in yesterday's Sunday Times.Lance Armstrong utterly denies ever having taken any
performance enhancing drugs.Accordingly, Lance Armstrong has instructed his lawyers to
immediately institute libel proceedings1) In the High Court in London against the Sunday Times and
David Walsh seeking an injunction and substantial damages2) In Paris, against David Walsh, Pierre Ballester, the
publishers of 'LA Confidential' and the publishers of
L'Express.Proceedings will be filed in the High Court tomorrow.
Issued by Schillings, Royalty House, 72-74 Dean Street,
London, W1D 3TL Ref: KS/GB/JR/A113/1 Tel. 020 7453 2500 Fax:
020 7453 2600------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
----"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Tailwind announced yesterday that Schilling would be going
to court in London today, seeking injunctive relief. Does
anyone know if they went to court and if so, what the
result was? -
Brian P said:
No results yet, here is the court brief from LA
LEGAL NOTICE RE: LANCE ARMSTRONG - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Of course, this is damage control to head off the stress of
the Tour press conferences. Regardless of whether the libel
suit is successful or unsuccessful Lance can deflect any
questions regarding doping or allegations made in the book
by refusing to comment as a result of ongoing legal
processes. -
Quoted message said:
No results yet, here is the court brief from LA
Well, one can only hope that when Lance is finished with
Walsh, Davey will be reduced to living in a cardboard box
behind the nearest McDonalds. Of course, those already
living in boxes behind the McDonalds will not appreciate him
bringing down the values in the neighborhood.------
Dave Casey - Realtor www.LasVegasHomesDirect.com
[email hidden] -
"GABIKE" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Regardless of whether the libel suit is successful or
unsuccessful Lance can deflect any questions regarding
doping or
allegationsQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
made in the book by refusing to comment as a result of
ongoing legal processes.How much more commenting does he need to do? Its the same
old [censored] that
hasQuoted message said:
been regurgitated for years with no proof.
Please cite to where Emma O'Reilly has made these
allegations before. -
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"GABIKE" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040616072215.03961.00000040@mb-
m19.aol.com...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Regardless of whether the libel suit is successful or
unsuccessful Lance can deflect any questions regarding
doping or
allegationsQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
made in the book by refusing to comment as a result of
ongoing legal processes.How much more commenting does he need to do? Its the
same old [censored] that
hasQuoted message said:
been regurgitated for years with no proof.
Please cite to where Emma O'Reilly has made these
allegations before.It does make you wonder.
It may be the first time her allegations have been
published, but prior to speaking with Walsh had she kept her
mouth shut? What was it about Walsh that provoked the
opening of the floodgates? -
"Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:NW-
[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"GABIKE" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040616072215.03961.00000040@mb-
m19.aol.com...Quoted message said:
>Regardless of whether the libel suit is successful or
>unsuccessful Lance can deflect any questions
>regarding doping or
allegationsQuoted message said:
>made in the book by refusing to comment as a result
>of ongoing legal processes.How much more commenting does he need to do? Its the
same old [censored]
thatQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
has
Quoted message said:
been regurgitated for years with no proof.
Please cite to where Emma O'Reilly has made these
allegations before.It does make you wonder.
It may be the first time her allegations have been
published, but prior to speaking with Walsh had she kept
her mouth shut? What was it about Walsh that provoked the
opening of the floodgates?Good question. What's the motive to speak now? Could
Armstrong's diatribe against [censored] Pound have anything to do
with it? Did they feel the hypocrisy level had reached
critical mass? I really don't know when Emma chose to speak,
but apparently Walsh has been working on the book for three
years. She is also reported to have kept a contemporaneous
diary which will make interesting reading a any trial held
down the road. -
Dave Casey said:
Quoted message said:
No results yet, here is the court brief from LA
Well, one can only hope that when Lance is finished with
Walsh, Davey will be reduced to living in a cardboard box
behind the nearest McDonalds. Of course, those already
living in boxes behind the McDonalds will not appreciate
him bringing down the values in the neighborhood.------
Dave Casey - Realtor www.LasVegasHomesDirect.com
[email hidden]Thank you for your professional opinion regarding cardboard
property values. -
In article <[email hidden]>,
Stewart Fleming said:
Dave Casey said:
Quoted message said:
No results yet, here is the court brief from LA
Well, one can only hope that when Lance is finished with
Walsh, Davey will be reduced to living in a cardboard
box behind the nearest McDonalds. Of course, those
already living in boxes behind the McDonalds will not
appreciate him bringing down the values in the
neighborhood.------
Dave Casey - Realtor www.LasVegasHomesDirect.com
[email hidden]Thank you for your professional opinion regarding
cardboard property values.Hey, go with what you know, right?
--
tanx, Howard"Copper will never be gold" Shellac
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
-
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Thank you for your professional opinion regarding
cardboard property values.
Hey, go with what you know, right?Hey, living in a city where I get to see stupidity in
action on a daily basis I just might have an opinion on
this stuff. Especially when you can walk through any casino
in the city and see people who would rather stuff the last
dollar of their paycheck into a nickle slot than pay the
rent. Of course, I can't complain too much. Their stupidity
is what allows me the privilege of not having to pay a
state income tax. So drop a couple of quarters the next
time you're in Vegas.------
Dave Casey - Realtor www.LasVegasHomesDirect.com
[email hidden]
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.